|
Post by ck100 on Dec 21, 2020 6:31:40 GMT
Any of you ever seen the infamous Brian De Palma film "The Bonfire of the Vanities" starring Tom Hanks and Bruce Willis? Has time been kind to this infamous film and let people discover its virtues (if any) or is it still as bad as people say it is? This film is more known for its behind-the-scenes production than the film itself. Studio interference, script changes, miscast leads, a director ill-suited to the material, etc. The sky is the limit for problems on this film. The one saving grace of this film for many is the opening 5-minute unbroken, long-take camera shot. Leonard Maltin Movie Guide Review: The Bonfire of the Vanities (1990) - BOMB out of 4 stars
"Appallingly heavy-handed "comedy" about a cocky Wall Street wheeler-dealer whose well-insulated life begins to crumble when his wife learns he's fooling around, and he and his paramour are involved in a hit-and-run accident. With all the power--and nuance--of Tom Wolfe's novel removed, and all the characters turned into caricatures (racist and otherwise), what's left is a pointless charade, and a pitiful waste of money and talent. F. Murray Abraham appears unbilled as the Bronx D.A."
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Dec 21, 2020 15:59:25 GMT
Two major problems with it as far as I'm concerned:
1. It just couldn't come close to what the book was. The book was sharply written satire and extremely intelligent. The film took on much more of a cartoonish atmosphere and contained nothing subtle or understated, if that makes any sense.
2. Tom Hanks. Willis was badly miscast as well of course but Hanks was just completely wrong for Sherman McCoy. The role should have gone to someone like Dan Aykroyd, who played a similar character in Trading Places.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Dec 21, 2020 20:38:21 GMT
There's a book that came out that is exclusively on the making of the movie and transferring the book to screen that I hear is really good.
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Dec 22, 2020 5:54:39 GMT
2/10 Dull and lifeless.
|
|