OT 4 More Things Atheists Should Stop Saying

A belief that makes you happy is not evidence that belief is true. It might make me happy to believe I have $10,000,000 in my bank account. My happiness has no bearing on whether or not I do. That's a blatant Wishful Thinking fallacy. 

Religion makes perfect sense to me. I was raised religious. I've also read about/studied religion more than the vast majority of believers. It's not that I have no evidence there is no God, it's that nobody does (or if someone does they've never presented it). Every time believers offer what they consider evidence, it turns out to be not evidence but cognitive biases and logical fallacies. Also, I haven't called anyone (believers or not) stupid or wrong; I've called believers irrational, and I've also said that all humans are irrational. The only evidence possible that something doesn't exist is a lack of evidence that it does, and this is precisely what we see with God. 

Religion, at least in its most serious, enthusiastic forms, seem to appeal far more to conservatives than liberals. There are many psychological reason for this, but it's why the vast majority of people who are highly religious (especially in the US) are also highly conservative. Yes, there are plenty of liberals who are religious, but they are also less inclined to let their religion's various tenants influence their voting. I bet you'd be hard-pressed to name any issue that liberals vote on for which they primarily cite their religion as the reason they vote that way, but that's certainly not true for conservatives. 

Cars don't encourage drivers to run over people. Religions encourage people to commit all kinds of immoral acts. Would you like me to quote you Exodus 21 again? 

Eva Yojimbo said
Ha ha ha . . . That makes absolutely no sense.
Before telescopes, there was no evidence that other planets existed, or that the Earth wasn't the center of the Universe.
Before somebody went around, there was no evidence the Earth was round.

Does that lack of evidence prove there are no other planets, the Earth is the center of the Universe, and the Earth is flat?

######

The rest of your post just seems to be blaming religion for what stupid people do with religion. The religion didn't influence stupid people to be or act stupid. They just misinterpreted their religion, and used it as an excuse to do bad.

I will and have joined you and people like you in condemning people for misinterpreting religion, and using it to do bad things. But it's the people, not the religion. Otherwise I would be a bad person also.

It absolutely makes sense if you understood how evidence works. If X does not exist, you would expect to see no evidence for it 100% of the time, while if X does exists you'd expect to see no evidence for it <100% of the time (in the vast majority of cases). You're also confusing evidence with proof; they are not the same thing. Other than the other planets existing, your examples also aren't analogous to what I'm saying. I already said earlier that, yes, before telescopes we had no evidence for other planets so it would've been irrational to believe they existed. It would've been rational to believe they were likely if only because we know planets can exist (we live on one) and it would seem unlikely that there'd be all these balls of light in the sky at night but no other planets around them. 

You really need to distinguish between "proof" and "evidence," and also between a "lack of belief" and a "belief." Better to think of this whole thing in term of probabilities. 

As for religion and bad behavior, you seem to be ignoring that there are explicit passages in religious books that condone, endorse, if not command immoral things. Of course religious people are free to ignore those things, and frequently do, but this doesn't change the fact that many also use such passages to convince themselves that such acts/beliefs are actually righteous. Without religion they wouldn't be able to do this. 

If X does not exist, you would expect to see no evidence for it 100% of the time, while if X does exists you'd expect to see no evidence for it <100% of the time (in the vast majority of cases).

——————

You’re talking about the physical world and applying it to a spiritual world that you can’t prove is nonexistent.

You make no sense.

And you're assuming the spiritual world exists and is separate from the physical world. Where is the evidence for either?

You can’t use the physical world to prove the existence or non-existence of a spiritual world.

You can’t.

No one else needs to prove anything to you unless they ask you to believe something that you don’t believe now.

I’m not making claims or asking anyone to believe anything.

I am saying that it makes no sense to use physical rules to test the idea of a spiritual world.

It proves nothing.

"I am saying that it makes no sense to use physical rules to test the idea of a spiritual world."

That's a bit fallacious, it comes with the presuposition that a "spiritual world" is even real to begin with. That's like saying "it makes no sense to use physical rules to test the idea of a magical leprechaun realm". The realm hasn't even been demonstrated to exist to begin with saying it can't be tested through "physical means" is rather moot.