|
Post by janntosh on Feb 26, 2021 21:15:32 GMT
technically not a movie though it did get a theatrical release in some countries in an edited form, but what the hell based on the Stephen King book and directed by Tobe Hooper who was coming off Texas Chainsaw Massacre and premiered in two parts over the course of a week. The film and book it is based on has an interesting concept. A vampire terrorizes not a Victorian era city but an at the time modern day small American town. The miniseries takes advantage of that concept and does it quite well. Hooper creates a tense and eerie atmosphere and there were a couple of moments that had me jump which pretty much never happens to me. David Soul makes for a fine all American lead and somehow the miniseries managed to secure the talents of acting legend James Mason who relishes playing the vampire's keeper. The vampire itself, clearly inspired by Count Orlok from the original Nosferatu, definitely makes an impression in its rather limited screentime It's not all great though. The script has a few issues including characters that are introduced and just disappear and plot holes (like when the vampire enters the kids house in the end without invitation). The film was made for TV and you are reminded of that with cheesy freeze frames that cut to commercial breaks. James Mason's characters end is quite anti climactic and the series ending makes you think they were hoping to use this as a pilot for a weekly series (and apparently that was the intention). Bonnie Bedelia (of later Die Hard fame) is bland as the love interest and the Lance Kerwin as the kid Mark is honestly flat out bad. But still this is a very enjoyable and creepy miniseries and I can see why it has a following after 40 years. I will probably check the book out.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Feb 26, 2021 21:37:48 GMT
I was really hoping to love this after all the good things I’d heard about it (and after reading the book, which I didn’t love but thought could be made into a great movie), but it just looks so overlit and TV movie-esque. I love Mason, of course, and the brilliant idea to turn Mr. Barlow into Count Orlok—but I keep thinking someone could have made an amazing movie out of this material, and possibly because of the TV budget this just isn’t it.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Feb 26, 2021 21:57:04 GMT
For the time it was ground-breaking. The use of contact lenses with the vampires was not new but the type of eyes they had really made them look creepy as hell.
The scene where Barlow appears in the kitchen--that's a great scene--and as already mentioned James Mason contributes much on the performance side. Geoffrey Lewis is also creepy in that rocking chair.
I thought David Soul was alright-where the body is starting to move and he calls for "Bill! Bill!" that was a good moment too. I'd rather watch the short version that the longer one though.
"You'll enjoy Mr Barlow, and he'll enjoy you."
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Feb 26, 2021 22:09:05 GMT
I loved it. The vampire were creepy. It’s a 70s made for tv flick...so it’s not going to hold up perfectly.
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Feb 26, 2021 22:09:16 GMT
I haven't read the book, but the miniseries sort of felt like a precursor to Twin Peaks to me.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Feb 26, 2021 22:11:40 GMT
I only saw it once and didn't find it that scary. James Mason is the best part. Kurt Barlow is creepy but he's not onscreen much.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Feb 26, 2021 22:16:45 GMT
I haven't read the book, but the miniseries sort of felt like a precursor to Twin Peaks to me. The book is excellent.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Feb 27, 2021 0:35:28 GMT
Fantastic.
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Feb 27, 2021 0:48:29 GMT
I have seen some version of this, but can't remember how long it was.
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Feb 27, 2021 0:49:21 GMT
I loved it. My major issue is you've got a 19 year old playing the kid who...I don't remember, did they say how old he was in the book, 12 or something? I always envisioned this tiny four eyed kid...like the one from Bloody Birthday, something like that.
My mom doesn't like Stephen King, but I've been tempted to show her this one because she loves to watch those older movies where you can point out all the people you've seen in everything else and she would know ALL of them here. 'It's Max Greevy off Law and Order! It's Leon's boyfriend off Roseanne! Ugh, David Soul, never could stand him', lol.
Now, is it me...Salem's Lot...and Phantasm...I ordered them both at the same time to see for Halloween, watched them back to back, and one just kind of feels like the other. And if I'm remembering right, the 2nd Phantasm movie was inspired in parts by Salem's Lot, the book though, not the miniseries.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Spencer on Feb 27, 2021 4:19:31 GMT
Admittedly it does have the look and feel of a made-for-TV movie, but it's still an effectively creepy, atmospheric horror piece with lots of good scares.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2021 4:47:56 GMT
I often refer to it as Earth Tones: The Film. I hope you like the color yellowish beige.
But it was decent. Not the worst Stephen King adaptation. The kid floating outside the window and the vampire jump scare make it worth the price of free admission alone.
|
|
|
Post by Morgana on Feb 27, 2021 8:37:14 GMT
I loved the book and the series. I found it incredibly creepy and it scared me to death in a couple of scenes.
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Feb 27, 2021 8:45:09 GMT
I read the book six years ago and was deeply impressed. It's easily one of King's best novels.
That said, I didn't much care for this miniseries. I liked the look of the vampire, but it lacked the book's dynamism and rich characterisations. It also looked very much like the TV movie it actually was. Overall, a disappointing adaptation IMO.
|
|