|
Post by wmcclain on Apr 7, 2021 20:34:48 GMT
The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes (1970), written, produced and directed by Billy Wilder. This was a find I'd never seen before: a classic "unknown" Holmes story. It's probably not of interest to devotees of the more recent action-hero detective, but if you like the older style it is well presented here. It's low-key but the setting and characters are just as we have come to know them. It opens with a slightly bawdy preface: when a retiring Russian ballerina coolly propositions the brainy detective, wanting him to father her child in exchange for a Stradivarius, Holmes begs off by intimating that he and Watson have been romantically involved for years. (I know that sounds like Wilder is trying to do a gay Holmes & Watson, but it's just a gag). Watson, who has been happily cavorting with the other ballerinas, is outraged and scandalized. But it does start him thinking about Holmes and women: why is he so cranky on the topic? He likes being mysterious and won't answer a direct question. But we come to find that just as Holmes will never get over Irene Adler, so his anguish over their latest client will send him back to the needle. After the opening it is more like a traditional Doyle story with many funny bits. They go to Loch Ness and Queen Victoria makes an appearance. Robert Stephens and Colin Blakely are Holmes and Watson, both very natural in their roles. Christopher Lee is brother Mycroft. The pretty client is Geneviève Page, last seen in Belle de Jour (1967) and El Cid (1961). When I first saw this I thought she looked like Francesca Annis. The Miklos Rozsa score gives it a classic movie feel. The DVD extras include some scenes that were removed from the original cut. We have subtitles but no audio for the flashback sequence, "The Dreadful Business of the Naked Honeymooners". I posted some notes on the Doyle stories in my review of The Hound of the Baskervilles (1939)
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 7, 2021 21:09:06 GMT
It’s probably my favorite Holmes movie, at least as filmmaking. Beautifully made, and if Robert Stephens isn’t a traditional Holmes (he, Wilder, and Diamond intentionally made the character Wildeish), he’s a great one, making the man feel like a real, far from perfect person.
While the ballerina scene is a joke (Watson with the male ballet dancers is hilarious), Wilder never quite answers the question of Holmes’ sexuality, does he? “Yes—you’re being presumptuous.”
The only major flaw for me is that Blakeley’s Watson is a little too stupid. Nigel Bruce works for me because he fits the series and because he’s just so charming, warm, and likable. But Blakeley’s playing Watson in a realistic look at the canon, a movie in which Sherlock Holmes makes fun of the deerstalker cap and Inverness cape. (Oddly enough, The Private Life does for Sherlock Holmes what Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ Watchmen does for superheroes—deconstructs and celebrates idealized characters at the same time.)
|
|
|
Post by OldAussie on Apr 7, 2021 21:13:07 GMT
A long time favourite. Holmes' stories are generally those involving intellectual stimulation but this is different. The downbeat ending is genuinely emotionally draining . And what a fantastic score - again - from Miklos Rozsa.
|
|
|
Post by marshamae on Apr 8, 2021 0:46:53 GMT
I love this more as a curiosity. It always seems a bit creaky to me. But I adore Robert Stephens, a brilliant actor , and we have so few performances of his on film. He is a very good Holmes, masterful and quick.
I am less taken with his Watson, who has neither the tut tut charm of Nigel Bruce nor the great 8ntelligence tied to a stable life that make the friendship make sense.
The other charms of this film for me are Clive REVILL , a fine actor with too few good film parts and Tamara toumanova as the ballerina. Never miss a chance to see one of The Ballet Russe baby ballerinas
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Apr 8, 2021 1:27:38 GMT
"The Dreadful Business of the Naked Honeymooners" can be found on YouTube (with the "naked" parts blurred out).
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 8, 2021 4:18:50 GMT
Robert Stephens’ portrayal is one of the best incarnations of Sherlock Holmes I’ve seen. Colin Blakely is not bad as Watson either. Although I kind of appreciate the laidback vibe, it may be too leisurely paced for its own good.
|
|