|
|
Post by msdemos on May 7, 2021 4:18:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on May 7, 2021 4:46:17 GMT
Gene Siskel slightly more.
|
|
|
|
Post by millar70 on May 7, 2021 4:50:06 GMT
Ebert slightly more, though I valued both of their opinions.
They were a lot of fun to watch back in the day.
|
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on May 7, 2021 6:13:51 GMT
I was about 60-40 with Rog.
I learned that Ebert seemed to have a natural bias in favour of an underdog - a mediocre production on a $1.7 million budget for example often seemed to have an easier time from Rog than any $70 mil budgeted of a similar quality. His bias seemed to reward effort in that manner, & I grew to appreciate that about his own reviews & my approach to films a bit myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on May 7, 2021 6:39:13 GMT
Usually more with Ebert.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 7, 2021 7:01:54 GMT
About equal. I don't remember agreeing with either of them more than the other.
If I disagreed with them--it was both at the same time.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on May 7, 2021 9:06:12 GMT
Gene Siskel Slightly More
|
|
|
|
Post by James on May 7, 2021 12:08:52 GMT
I guess Ebert slightly more.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 7, 2021 13:00:58 GMT
Ebert.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mulder and Scully on May 7, 2021 14:26:51 GMT
Neither.
I never go by what "film critics" have to say.
Movies are some of the most subjective things out there. "Films critics" are useless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on May 7, 2021 17:49:34 GMT
I tended to agree with Roger Ebert more.
|
|
Jason143
Junior Member
@glaceon
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 610
|
Post by Jason143 on May 7, 2021 17:52:42 GMT
Roger Ebert was quite balanced and not snobby. He gave the early comic movies a fair analysis.
|
|
