Just watched "In Time" starring Timberlake and Seyfried.
May 12, 2021 15:16:21 GMT
via mobile
Nalkarj likes this
Post by movieliker on May 12, 2021 15:16:21 GMT
I thought the acting was good. Timberlake and Seyfried are attractive. I found the movie entertaining. But the plot holes are continuous.
I get the general story -- a dystopian future where the rich control the currency of time. The rich live forever. And the poor fight to extend a short life. But . . .
- How can the "Timekeepers" take a 1,000 years from anybody, only leaving 2 hours to live, without a trial, representation, or any evidence?
- How come there are cameras everywhere that record Will (Justine Timberlake) seeing the guy that just gave him 100 years of time, floating in a drainage canal? But they don't record that same guy sitting on the edge of a bidge alone, running out of time and falling into that canal --- with Will nowhere around?
I was able to suspend disbelief and enjoy the movie for what it is --- a dystopian fantasy. Scrutinizing the logic will just ruin the experience. But some plot holes are hard to ignore.
I found the movie entertaining. I think you can too, if you don't think too hard about the details.
8/10
Did you see it?
What did you think?
