|
Post by ck100 on May 16, 2021 17:29:44 GMT
Any fans of this underrated Sylvester Stallone movie? When people think of Sylvester Stallone, they'll immediately think of the Rocky and Rambo movies. If not those, then other movies like Demolition Man, Cliffhanger, Copland, Tango & Cash, Cobra, etc. But one movie that is never mentioned among Stallone's most memorable movies, that should be mentioned, is Nighthawks. The movie may not be a masterpiece or a great film, but it's an effective low-key police action/drama and a refreshing change of pace from Stallone's more "Hollywood" movies. You have actors doing good work in this movie either just coming off of famous films, like Billy Dee Williams and Persis Khambatta from Empire Strikes Back and Star Trek: The Motion Picture, or you have actors doing good work in this movie before the verge of a big success in their career, like Stallone with First Blood and Rutger Hauer with Blade Runner. Add to this movie some effective sequences like the subway chase and the overhead tram car hostage situation. Leonard Maltin Movie Guide Review: Nighthawks (1981) - 3 out of 4 stars"Exciting story of two N.Y.C. street cops reassigned to special unit that's tracking a ruthless international terrorist (Hauer). On target from the first scene to the fade-out, with plenty of hair-raising moments along the way."
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on May 16, 2021 20:13:38 GMT
I'd take it over that Rambo dreck any day and three times on Sunday. Very entertaining film
|
|
|
Post by millar70 on May 16, 2021 20:36:35 GMT
Stallone did a couple of good films in that time frame before Rocky and Rambo basically became serial movie characters.
Victory is another one that should be checked out by those that haven't seen it.
|
|
Downey
Junior Member
@hunter
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 497
|
Post by Downey on May 16, 2021 20:44:17 GMT
I'd take it over that Rambo dreck any day and three times on Sunday. Very entertaining film Have Stallone ditch the pimp beard then you might have a point.
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on May 16, 2021 21:59:40 GMT
6/10
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 17, 2021 1:54:08 GMT
Turn off the sound the story is about a cop who has to cross-dress to get the job done. He does it at the start-then he goes to his clothing designer girlfriend to borrow some more clothes and then at the end he does it again to catch the bad guy.
|
|
|
Post by theravenking on May 17, 2021 11:40:11 GMT
6/10
I found the twist at the end pretty hilarious. Rutger Hauer is an effective bad guy, but overall the movie drags a bit and is a bit too low-key to really excite. I'm not surprised that it flopped on release.
|
|
Hurdy Gurdy Man
Junior Member
@hurdygurdyman
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 975
Member is Online
|
Post by Hurdy Gurdy Man on May 17, 2021 14:09:08 GMT
Directed by Bruce Malmuth, who later made Hard to Kill. DoP is James Contner who lenses New York in a blue-white palette, similar to how he had lensed Cruising a year before.
I liked it when I saw it once a decade ago. Since then I have seen the Bad Movie Beatdown review of it and now I am not sure how much of it I like and why.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on May 29, 2021 3:39:51 GMT
A troubled production, for sure, but does that matter today? It's tense and involving, tremendously exciting in places, and thoroughly entertaining. Great movie.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Jun 4, 2021 8:47:59 GMT
A troubled production, for sure, but does that matter today? It's tense and involving, tremendously exciting in places, and thoroughly entertaining. Great movie. Yeah, I remember reading a bit of how it was Rutger Hauer's first american movie, and he early on, got onto the wrong side of Sly during the making. So much, that Hauer supposedly got fed up, and threatened to "hurt" Stallone, very badly, if he did not back down, with his "prima donna" act. Not sure how much of it is true, or not. But I guess Hauer, coming straight from Europe, and then into a big budget Hollywood Stallone movie, well, maybe a bit too big of an cultural clash of egos, took place during the making, but then again, I felt maybe it got benefitted into their intense characters on screen. Anyway, I also remember hearing some of this, during a rather enjoyable and informative Joe Spinnell documentary, some years ago, and that this film was to be the last one, that Spinnell and his former close friend Stallone did together. Well, having just browsed through some of the trivia sections of IMDb, I guess it is not that unthinkable, that there were some differences, during filming: Rutger Hauer lost his mother and his best friend during the production of this movie. He returned to his native Netherlands for both of their respective funerals, but returned to the production each time within a few days. Despite all of the personal drama and all the difficulties on the set, Hauer stated in his autobiography that he was happy he stayed aboard, as this movie caused him to be noticed in Hollywood, and started an impressive international career. Amongst the scenes which were deleted from the original cut of the movie are most of the scenes between Sylvester Stallone and Lindsay Wagner, Rutger Hauer and Persis Khambatta, more scenes explaining the plot better, and many other scenes because Universal Pictures wanted a fast-paced action movie. They also deleted most of the graphic and gory scenes due to the concern that the movie would get "X" rating. And indeed, even though it was already deleted for violence by the studio, this movie still got an "X" rating when it was submitted to the M.P.A.A. and it again had to be heavily edited for an "R" rating. Stallone also had a hand in the re-editing of this movie. He was jealous of Hauer whose performance dominated the movie, so during filming, he wrote and added more scenes for his character, and later he also deleted some of Hauer's scenes from the movie.Although stories about their on-set fights are still talked about amongst fans of this movie and both actors, Rutger Hauer has said in recent interviews that he actually didn't take his arguments with Sylvester Stallone personally and that the biggest problem during filming was that it was a very difficult movie to make.(A shame, it seems like Sly did take it more personal, if any of these trivia sections are true, and comes of as yeah, quite a prima-donna, a shame if it hurted how the film could have been a better made one, because of personal difficulties with his fellow actor) All in all, I always wanted to like it much more, than I did. Learning just know, of how much that were either cut out or edited, I think both of the DVDs I own, also have edited away certain scenes or musical score, as well. I wonder if an Director's cut, would do it any justice, as the performances are stellar, but the story and pace, somehow drags on, as others has already mentioned.
|
|