|
Post by twothousandonemark on May 25, 2021 3:58:20 GMT
It's fine, though it doesn't feel very MCU. That's a lot of characters at once though most of us have no idea about.
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on May 25, 2021 3:58:59 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2021 10:35:29 GMT
It was ok. Maybe the next 'trailer' will do it for me. The triangular spaceship is so uninspired and looks very cheap Yeah, this and Shang Chi’s trailer just left me feeling kinda Meh. Hopefully the Spiderman trailer will get me hyped. Black Widow movie trailer/s is the best so far
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 25, 2021 17:01:07 GMT
Yeah I don't blame people for not being into it. It's so far removed from the rest of the MCU, they felt they had to add that last scene referencing the Avengers. I'm highly intrigued but I'm also keeping my expectations in check. I just hope it's not a disaster. The Eternals and the Inhumans are two of the most interesting properties MArvel has, it would be a shame if they both ended up being total failures. (Still holding out hope for an Inhumans reboot, though. The non-Disney+ tv shows have all been removed from the canon, right?) As much as I love Eternals, I suspect they will go the way of the Inhumans. You can tell by the sorts of suppositions and questions coming from MCU fans that they don't know what to make of this property. Why didn't the Eternals help out with catastrophe X or participate in event Y? The answer is simple, but it's also very complicated. It all boils down to the Eternals not being traditional superheroes. Kirby was using the comic book medium to explore enormous ideas in speculative fiction with Eternals. Some of these ideas are provocative and polarising. I can already see some fans not taking to the idea that "gods" lived among us or were instrumental in our development. The relationships between humanity, the deviants, the Eternals, and the celestials are complex. Accurately portraying them is beyond the scope of the MCU. What we're likely to get in place of the rich lineages portrayed in the comic books is some overly simplified fairytale. Even if this movie is spectacular, it's likely to curry favor only with purists and diehards. General audiences that are now conditioned by the MCU smack-down paradigm are likely to leave theaters feeling disappointed or indifferent. In a way, that is fine by me as I selfishly never wanted a property like Eternals to become a household name.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 25, 2021 17:25:47 GMT
Yeah I don't blame people for not being into it. It's so far removed from the rest of the MCU, they felt they had to add that last scene referencing the Avengers. I'm highly intrigued but I'm also keeping my expectations in check. I just hope it's not a disaster. The Eternals and the Inhumans are two of the most interesting properties MArvel has, it would be a shame if they both ended up being total failures. (Still holding out hope for an Inhumans reboot, though. The non-Disney+ tv shows have all been removed from the canon, right?) As much as I love Eternals, I suspect they will go the way of the Inhumans. You can tell by the sorts of suppositions and questions coming from MCU fans that they don't know what to make of this property. Why didn't the Eternals help out with catastrophe X or participate in event Y? The answer is simple, but it's also very complicated. It all boils down to the Eternals not being traditional superheroes. Kirby was using the comic book medium to explore enormous ideas in speculative fiction with Eternals. Some of these ideas are provocative and polarising. I can already see some fans not taking to the idea that "gods" lived among us or were instrumental in our development. The relationships between humanity, the deviants, the Eternals, and the celestials are complex. Accurately portraying them is beyond the scope of the MCU. What we're likely to get in place of the rich lineages portrayed in the comic books is some overly simplified fairytale. Even if this movie is spectacular, it's likely to curry favor only with purists and diehards. General audiences that are now conditioned by the MCU smack-down paradigm are likely to leave theaters feeling disappointed or indifferent. In a way, that is fine by me as I selfishly never wanted a property like Eternals to become a household name. It's not MCU material, to be honest. It should've been a Disney+ show at best. It isn't your typical superhero story and casual fans (even hardcore movie only fans) are most likely going to be underwhelmed. I've always thought it was the kind of project that could either be great or terrible, I don't think it's the kind of material that can be just 'ok.' They already have to explain why the Eternals didn't involve themselves before now, and now, if they really take a deep dive into the lore and make it about the Deviants and Celestial judgment, they'll have to explain why the other major heroes aren't involved. As with Captain Marvel, the MCU is introducing a powerful element too late in the game. It doesn't fit and it doesn't feel like it belongs with what we've seen so far. It's going to be a tough sell.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2021 17:42:30 GMT
Seeing the trailer again this morning has me a bit more excited for this. It’s actually pretty great to see something so different in the MCU. No one can say this is a “cookie cutter” comic movie. The problem may be that it’s too conservative of a trailer and needed more “important” moments to sell the property to unsure fans.
I think what I really need to see is what the Celestials look like on screen. That’s the exciting part of this mythology to me. And the spoilers, if true, suggest this movie has some really fantastic Celestial scenes in it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2021 18:02:57 GMT
Meh. Where's the Jack Kirby influence, again? Can’t lie. I also really wanted some of this on screen...
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 25, 2021 18:47:15 GMT
As much as I love Eternals, I suspect they will go the way of the Inhumans. You can tell by the sorts of suppositions and questions coming from MCU fans that they don't know what to make of this property. Why didn't the Eternals help out with catastrophe X or participate in event Y? The answer is simple, but it's also very complicated. It all boils down to the Eternals not being traditional superheroes. Kirby was using the comic book medium to explore enormous ideas in speculative fiction with Eternals. Some of these ideas are provocative and polarising. I can already see some fans not taking to the idea that "gods" lived among us or were instrumental in our development. The relationships between humanity, the deviants, the Eternals, and the celestials are complex. Accurately portraying them is beyond the scope of the MCU. What we're likely to get in place of the rich lineages portrayed in the comic books is some overly simplified fairytale. Even if this movie is spectacular, it's likely to curry favor only with purists and diehards. General audiences that are now conditioned by the MCU smack-down paradigm are likely to leave theaters feeling disappointed or indifferent. In a way, that is fine by me as I selfishly never wanted a property like Eternals to become a household name. It's not MCU material, to be honest. It should've been a Disney+ show at best. It isn't your typical superhero story and casual fans (even hardcore movie only fans) are most likely going to be underwhelmed. I've always thought it was the kind of project that could either be great or terrible, I don't think it's the kind of material that can be just 'ok.' They already have to explain why the Eternals didn't involve themselves before now, and now, if they really take a deep dive into the lore and make it about the Deviants and Celestial judgment, they'll have to explain why the other major heroes aren't involved. As with Captain Marvel, the MCU is introducing a powerful element too late in the game. It doesn't fit and it doesn't feel like it belongs with what we've seen so far. It's going to be a tough sell. I couldn't agree with you more. Much like the Celestial experiments with humanity, I don't think Marvel Studios' experiment with Eternals will work out the way they planned. I do hope they preserve the connections between the Eternals and Thanos. Thanos' arc becomes so much more satisfying when you know he is a second-generation Eternal born with the Deviant gene. If not for a bad roll of the genetic dice, he would have been an Eternal and perhaps the greatest among them. His depravity stems from his treatment as "less-than" by perfect beings who surrounded him, including his brother Eros. It would make sense if the Eternals choose to surface now because they feel culpability in the blip. Thanos' involvement would make them indirectly responsible for the universe's fate. I don't mind this story not involving other superheroes because this story's events is clearly outside of the scope of the jobber superhero who's trapped himself in a tin can or uses a garbage can lid to protect himself. Eternals is about the unknowable machinations of gods. But let's look at the issues of non-involvement for a second. The trailer states that the Eternals have never intervened in the affairs of man. As long-lived and ageless beings, they've contented themselves to guide humanity from the comfortable distance of anonymity and objectivity. This makes perfect sense given their mandate from their masters, the Celestials. The Celestials created the Eternals from proto-human beings to act as sentries meant to guard the Earth and not necessarily its current inhabitants. Eternals could conceivably live to see humanity fall and be replaced by another species altogether. Celestials only care about preserving the integrity of their ongoing experimentation on humanity. The Eternals were literally created to do just that. The real question for all those wondering where the Eternals were during Thanos' reign of terror is where were the Celestials.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2021 3:54:14 GMT
Seeing the trailer again this morning has me a bit more excited for this. It’s actually pretty great to see something so different in the MCU. No one can say this is a “cookie cutter” comic movie. The problem may be that it’s too conservative of a trailer and needed more “important” moments to sell the property to unsure fans. I think what I really need to see is what the Celestials look like on screen. That’s the exciting part of this mythology to me. And the spoilers, if true, suggest this movie has some really fantastic Celestial scenes in it. I believe there was one in Guardians of the Galaxy when the Collector was explaining it to the Guardians
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2021 3:58:23 GMT
Yeah I don't blame people for not being into it. It's so far removed from the rest of the MCU, they felt they had to add that last scene referencing the Avengers. I'm highly intrigued but I'm also keeping my expectations in check. I just hope it's not a disaster. The Eternals and the Inhumans are two of the most interesting properties MArvel has, it would be a shame if they both ended up being total failures. (Still holding out hope for an Inhumans reboot, though. The non-Disney+ tv shows have all been removed from the canon, right?) As much as I love Eternals, I suspect they will go the way of the Inhumans. You can tell by the sorts of suppositions and questions coming from MCU fans that they don't know what to make of this property. Why didn't the Eternals help out with catastrophe X or participate in event Y? The answer is simple, but it's also very complicated. It all boils down to the Eternals not being traditional superheroes. Kirby was using the comic book medium to explore enormous ideas in speculative fiction with Eternals. Some of these ideas are provocative and polarising. I can already see some fans not taking to the idea that "gods" lived among us or were instrumental in our development. The relationships between humanity, the deviants, the Eternals, and the celestials are complex. Accurately portraying them is beyond the scope of the MCU. What we're likely to get in place of the rich lineages portrayed in the comic books is some overly simplified fairytale. Even if this movie is spectacular, it's likely to curry favor only with purists and diehards. General audiences that are now conditioned by the MCU smack-down paradigm are likely to leave theaters feeling disappointed or indifferent. In a way, that is fine by me as I selfishly never wanted a property like Eternals to become a household name. Maybe, hard to say. Kinda too early to tell. There are still more trailers after all It will probably still make a lot of money. Say close to a billion
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 26, 2021 14:36:52 GMT
Meh. Where's the Jack Kirby influence, again? Kirby wasn't just the artist on Eternals. He conceived, wrote, and drew Eternals with little to no collaboration. His visual stylings may not be prominent in this trailer, but his ideas are certainly present. That said, I do hope the movie does embrace some of his visual concepts as well.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on May 26, 2021 16:57:15 GMT
Looks spectacular.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on May 26, 2021 18:37:30 GMT
It wouldn’t surprise me if this ends up being Marvel’s biggest critical darling of the year. It looks alright. The trailer didn’t amaze me, but it looks a bit different from the typical MCU film.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on May 26, 2021 18:55:18 GMT
I'm... actually surprised at how much love this trailer is getting in this forum. I thought it was bland as f#ck and did very little to make me interested in the movie.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 30, 2021 16:14:41 GMT
Bunch of articles speculating that Barry Keoghan's character Druig is the real villain.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on May 31, 2021 0:31:46 GMT
Bunch of articles speculating that Barry Keoghan's character Druig is the real villain. The impression I got when I was reading about the characters was that he would turn in his own people.
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Jun 1, 2021 18:27:47 GMT
I'm a little fuzzy on the distinction between a teaser trailer and just a trailer.
Looks interesting though. Different.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jun 1, 2021 20:25:33 GMT
I'm a little fuzzy on the distinction between a teaser trailer and just a trailer.
Looks interesting though. Different. Me too. To me a teaser should be about 30 seconds long. This is a full initial trailer in my book.
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Jun 2, 2021 0:05:40 GMT
I'm a little fuzzy on the distinction between a teaser trailer and just a trailer.
Looks interesting though. Different. Me too. To me a teaser should be about 30 seconds long. This is a full initial trailer in my book. Sometimes at the theater, after the minute or so mark I just close my eyes and say okay, this trailer's done. It's still going, but it's done.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 1, 2021 13:18:35 GMT
Possible concept art for the Deviants.
|
|