|
|
Post by Skaathar on Aug 13, 2021 21:06:21 GMT
Ok well that's quite different. If Gunn is being lambasted because of stuff like this then that’s far more serious than just off-color jokes. Of course it's not quite concrete till proven, but it's defnitely not stuff that should be shoved under the rug. |
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 13, 2021 21:14:20 GMT
That seems like a pretty clickbaity article. That party he hosted was already common knowledge. Not sure how that changes anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 14, 2021 0:25:49 GMT
That seems like a pretty clickbaity article. That party he hosted was already common knowledge. Not sure how that changes anything. That it was, however this is the first time I had heard it was a party that he hosted, I thought he was just a guest or something. Time will tell if he was aware of the wrong doing here.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 14, 2021 0:49:56 GMT
That seems like a pretty clickbaity article. That party he hosted was already common knowledge. Not sure how that changes anything. That it was, however this is the first time I had heard it was a party that he hosted, I thought he was just a guest or something. Time will tell if he was aware of the wrong doing here. From what I can tell, the wrongdoing in question wasn’t even alleged to have happened at the party, and Gunn isn’t listed as a defendant in the lawsuit. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems like the person filing the suit is merely speculating that her alleged rapist was at the party. |
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Aug 14, 2021 2:10:30 GMT
Most of the “outrage” came from bad faith trolls who wanted to take James Gunn down as retaliation for what recently happened with Roseanne Barr. This. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Aug 14, 2021 4:44:03 GMT
That it was, however this is the first time I had heard it was a party that he hosted, I thought he was just a guest or something. Time will tell if he was aware of the wrong doing here. From what I can tell, the wrongdoing in question wasn’t even alleged to have happened at the party, and Gunn isn’t listed as a defendant in the lawsuit. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems like the person filing the suit is merely speculating that her alleged rapist was at the party. The lawsuit mentions 1 to 5 unidentified defendants whom the plaintiff doesn't seem to know much about or something. Do you think one of those unidentified defendants might be James Gunn or no? How does this court document thing work? That being said, that article is written by Jack Posobiec, so I wouldn't exactly take it seriously either. P.S. Also, it looks like the plaintiff at least KNOWS James Gunn based on how he got mentioned in that court document, and given that she apparently doesn't know other 1 to 5 defenders, would that make it less likely that he's one of those unidentified defendants? Again, I'm not sure how this court document thing works. |
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 14, 2021 12:19:04 GMT
From what I can tell, the wrongdoing in question wasn’t even alleged to have happened at the party, and Gunn isn’t listed as a defendant in the lawsuit. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems like the person filing the suit is merely speculating that her alleged rapist was at the party. The lawsuit mentions 1 to 5 unidentified defendants whom the plaintiff doesn't seem to know much about or something. Do you think one of those unidentified defendants might be James Gunn or no? How does this court document thing work? That being said, that article is written by Jack Posobiec, so I wouldn't exactly take it seriously either. P.S. Also, it looks like the plaintiff at least KNOWS James Gunn based on how he got mentioned in that court document, and given that she apparently doesn't know other 1 to 5 defenders, would that make it less likely that he's one of those unidentified defendants? Again, I'm not sure how this court document thing works. Jack Posobiec has been out for James Gunn’s blood for the past three years. He’ll find any reach he can to try and prove that Gunn is a pedo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Aug 14, 2021 12:29:30 GMT
The lawsuit mentions 1 to 5 unidentified defendants whom the plaintiff doesn't seem to know much about or something. Do you think one of those unidentified defendants might be James Gunn or no? How does this court document thing work? That being said, that article is written by Jack Posobiec, so I wouldn't exactly take it seriously either. P.S. Also, it looks like the plaintiff at least KNOWS James Gunn based on how he got mentioned in that court document, and given that she apparently doesn't know other 1 to 5 defenders, would that make it less likely that he's one of those unidentified defendants? Again, I'm not sure how this court document thing works. Jack Posobiec has been out for James Gunn’s blood for the past three years. He’ll find any reach he can to try and prove that Gunn is a pedo. Best not to prove Jack right then by joking about "sexy seductive toddlers". Just a thought. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Aug 14, 2021 12:52:29 GMT
The lawsuit mentions 1 to 5 unidentified defendants whom the plaintiff doesn't seem to know much about or something. Do you think one of those unidentified defendants might be James Gunn or no? How does this court document thing work? That being said, that article is written by Jack Posobiec, so I wouldn't exactly take it seriously either. P.S. Also, it looks like the plaintiff at least KNOWS James Gunn based on how he got mentioned in that court document, and given that she apparently doesn't know other 1 to 5 defenders, would that make it less likely that he's one of those unidentified defendants? Again, I'm not sure how this court document thing works. Jack Posobiec has been out for James Gunn’s blood for the past three years. He’ll find any reach he can to try and prove that Gunn is a pedo. I'm not surprised to hear this. Still, I'm not sure how the whole court document thing works. I mean, why is it even mentioning 1 to 5 defendants that the plaintiff herself doesn't seem to know? |
|
