lune7000
Junior Member
@lune7000
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 678
|
Post by lune7000 on Nov 20, 2021 3:45:14 GMT
the difficulty with answering this question comes from the fact that so many adults never grow up. If a 30 year old person is dressing up as Luke are they really adult? More and more people are getting lost in fantasy.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Nov 20, 2021 4:27:13 GMT
Not at all. I consider them sci-fi fantasy adventure movies that are appropriate for all age groups.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Nov 20, 2021 4:43:41 GMT
Nope. Never.
|
|
|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Nov 20, 2021 4:51:50 GMT
Yeah, but that's not a bad thing. So are Close Encounters and Indiana Jones. Lots of great movies are.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 20, 2021 4:55:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Nov 20, 2021 5:30:41 GMT
I mean, not only is one more graphic than the other, you countered with an infamously dark movie parents boycotted and even some of its actors wouldn't let their children see. Anyway, here's another fun gif for the kiddos:  |
|
mgmarshall
Junior Member
@mgmarshall
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 3,337
|
Post by mgmarshall on Nov 20, 2021 8:30:48 GMT
Let's take this a step further. How about Indiana Jones? Children certainly loved them (and still would, I'd wager), and yet they're violent and wildly morbid at times.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Nov 20, 2021 8:47:27 GMT
Definitely not 7-9, the most multi dimensional and best written scripts. They were too complex for children. Maybe not 4-6. They were too risk taking and mature. The 1-3 maybe, but they had a lot of sick propaganda.
What does "children's movies" mean? I'm guessing movies that don't have any character motivation and don't involve strategy, because kids aren't expected to understand such things. But these are almost always the movies with the most dangerous and divisive messages.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Nov 20, 2021 9:39:35 GMT
Definitely not 7-9, the most multi dimensional and best written scripts. They were too complex for children. Maybe not 4-6. They were too risk taking and mature. The 1-3 maybe, but they had a lot of sick propaganda. What does "children's movies" mean? I'm guessing movies that don't have any character motivation and don't involve strategy, because kids aren't expected to understand such things. But these are almost always the movies with the most dangerous and divisive messages. It means that the target audience for the movies are children. Even the creator George Lucas calls them children`s movies. And you know i think the creator of the movies would know what his target audience for the movies was.
|
|
|
|
Post by dwightmachinehead on Nov 20, 2021 13:18:15 GMT
The Phantom Menace I'd consider a kid's movie. I'd consider the OT boys'adventure movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Nov 20, 2021 21:10:51 GMT
I think "child-friendly" is the most accurate term.
|
|
|
|
Post by ghostintheshell on Nov 21, 2021 19:16:17 GMT
Only the Lego 'Star Wars' variants!
|
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Nov 21, 2021 21:47:37 GMT
Sometimes I think it could use more swearing.
"Why, you stuck-up half-witted scruffy-looking motherfucking nerf herder."
"Put Captain Solo in the fucking cargo hold.
"IT'S A FUCKING TRAP!"
|
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Nov 21, 2021 23:14:50 GMT
As a whole I’d say no. Not that they can’t be watched and loved by children, but that’s not the same as being a children a movie.
|
|
