Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2017 1:50:22 GMT
I never understood the over the top love for both.
Frequently got them confused with each other.
So who's better? And why?
What's their legacy?
And why would you consider them relevant today/yesterday/future
|
|
autopsy_12
Sophomore
@onedoomedspacemarine
Posts: 131
Likes: 57
|
Post by autopsy_12 on May 22, 2017 13:01:43 GMT
King was an excellent heel and personality back in his day. It's one thing to watch his stuff on youtube like you do and it's another to have actually been there for it when it was new.
Is there anybody that you actually do "get" that doesn't relate to Hulk Hogan or WCW in some way?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2017 16:18:28 GMT
King was an excellent heel and personality back in his day. It's one thing to watch his stuff on youtube like you do and it's another to have actually been there for it when it was new. Is there anybody that you actually do "get" that doesn't relate to Hulk Hogan or WCW in some way? I love his Kaufmann stuff. It's great theater all these years later. Other than that - I just don't 'get it'. Just my own personal taste. I see nothing 'special'. I'll watch clips and see these 300 hillbillies go crazy for him. It's actually a cool setting/atmosphere - i.e. Memphis, Mid South, etc. Would rather watch those clips than today's product - but have always been intrigued by some sports entertainers that are wildly over - and I just don't 'get'. Like Dusty Rhodes to. I find it fascinating - like - 'what am I missing and what does this guy have to make people go Ape for him like this'. To each their own. We all have different tastes on what appeals to us. As far as your question, is there anybody I get that doesn't relate to Hulk Hogan or WCW. Well. Although it may be an unpopular opinion to most - for today's product - I have a great deal of respect for Cena and Reigns - and I know that's an unpopular opinion and they get hated on a lot. I enjoy Kevin Owens, Rollins. Y2J - but I guess that relates to WCW. Huge Kurt Angle fan and it's terrific to see him back. Shocked I enjoy watching Styles because to be blunt from what I saw of him in TNA - I just didn't get him either. I'm glad they turned the Neville guy heel. I've enjoyed that from what I've seen......
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 22, 2017 22:08:09 GMT
I am a huge Jerry Lawler fan. The man was a master of ring psychology. There's nothing the man didn't get about the business. He may not have had a lot of wrestling skills which is probably why some people may not take to him. The man could talk people into a building by the thousands with his interviews. Heel or face the man just got it. When he pulled that strap down, the whole building was whipped into a frenzy. Larry Z I am a fan of also. He had more of a slow paced style which some people didn't care for, but he was tremendous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2017 1:03:45 GMT
I am a huge Jerry Lawler fan. The man was a master of ring psychology. There's nothing the man didn't get about the business. He may not have had a lot of wrestling skills which is probably why some people may not take to him. The man could talk people into a building by the thousands with his interviews. Heel or face the man just got it. When he pulled that strap down, the whole building was whipped into a frenzy. Larry Z I am a fan of also. He had more of a slow paced style which some people didn't care for, but he was tremendous. thank you for 'he may not have had a lot of wrestling skills'. i agree. didn't have the look either. which is why im baffled a whole territory went nuts over him for years. it was the perfect stage for the Kaufmann stuff which i find brilliant to this day. a 'hollywood' guy coming down and knocking these slow witted hicks who clamored for this schlub. larry z? awesome stuff in wcw. he goes up against Hall as the face coming off commentary in WCW at a PPV - it's when Dusty turned heel. dusty comes out of nowhere and swerves as Hall, Louie Spicoli and Dusty drop elbows on Larry as the whole crowd chants - 'Larry Sucks!' - as 'Larry' is supposed to be the 'face'. Hilarious. Bye bye Larry!
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 23, 2017 3:30:39 GMT
You're not the first person to say that about the King. Regarding his looks and size. The man had the best looking punch in the business though. That really helped. It looked believable. They even worked angles around him having less wrestling skills. They brought in Bockwinkle to the territory and they did a match where Lawler wasn't allowed to throw any punches. That and the promos surrounding it how he couldn't wrestle and all that. But I do think he has more skills than he got credit for. He just got over huge ever since 1974 and when Jackie Fargo finished up, he was the man to run with the torch. Successful booker also. The Kaufman stuff everybody remembers. Didn't really do that much for the territory, but everybody knew about it and nationwide also. I caught that whole run. I'll watch it again once I get all the discs.
I think I vaguely remember that about Larry. Wasn't that after he stopped wrestling full time? 1997 or something like that? I think I liked his Crockett stuff the best and some of the AWA stuff. And Georgia too feuding with Paul Orndorff that was cool. You never really saw him as a face since before he turned on Bruno, but people liked his commentary on the pro show.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2017 19:06:36 GMT
You're not the first person to say that about the King. Regarding his looks and size. The man had the best looking punch in the business though. That really helped. It looked believable. They even worked angles around him having less wrestling skills. They brought in Bockwinkle to the territory and they did a match where Lawler wasn't allowed to throw any punches. That and the promos surrounding it how he couldn't wrestle and all that. But I do think he has more skills than he got credit for. He just got over huge ever since 1974 and when Jackie Fargo finished up, he was the man to run with the torch. Successful booker also. The Kaufman stuff everybody remembers. Didn't really do that much for the territory, but everybody knew about it and nationwide also. I caught that whole run. I'll watch it again once I get all the discs. I think I vaguely remember that about Larry. Wasn't that after he stopped wrestling full time? 1997 or something like that? I think I liked his Crockett stuff the best and some of the AWA stuff. And Georgia too feuding with Paul Orndorff that was cool. You never really saw him as a face since before he turned on Bruno, but people liked his commentary on the pro show. what are your views about him booking himself to be champion down there like 110 times.........
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 23, 2017 22:38:24 GMT
You mean with the USWA unified title? It was pretty much the same formula that worked for them throughout the 70's and 80's. He was the southern champion, he'd have a 2-3 week program, drop the title and regain it. It worked for a long time. When that basically morphed into the USWA unified title they just did the same thing. There really was nobody else you want to put that title on long term in that territory. They put the title on Sid for awhile and that worked, and you can have Brian Christopher or Bill Dundee sometimes, but Lawler was the #1 guy. He didn't do it for ego or to keep anybody down. That was basically just business. If he was booker in wcw and he put the wcw title on himself and won it 57 times, that wouldn't work. But for Memphis it did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2017 22:43:48 GMT
You mean with the USWA unified title? It was pretty much the same formula that worked for them throughout the 70's and 80's. He was the southern champion, he'd have a 2-3 week program, drop the title and regain it. It worked for a long time. When that basically morphed into the USWA unified title they just did the same thing. There really was nobody else you want to put that title on long term in that territory. They put the title on Sid for awhile and that worked, and you can have Brian Christopher or Bill Dundee sometimes, but Lawler was the #1 guy. He didn't do it for ego or to keep anybody down. That was basically just business. If he was booker in wcw and he put the wcw title on himself and won it 57 times, that wouldn't work. But for Memphis it did. i hear this argument today with Hogan haters, Cena haters..... do you think perhaps he could have built somebody (anybody) up better to put them over and give them a bigger push for the betterment of the territory? did he put anybody over down there? i get dropping the belt 25 times - but seems like he always regained it. did anybody ever get the best of him in a feud? or was that the point and what i'm missing - the territory was pretty much his. i just look at all those title reigns and my jaw drops. weren't there some big names that ran through those territories? i'm guessing it was just a 'short stay' though for that wrestler to sign with NWA or WWF and maybe lawler just floundered there until he got called up into the WWF early 90s.
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 23, 2017 23:30:32 GMT
This is a good topic. It depends on the time period you're asking about. In the 90's, the talent pool was kind of thin because all the top stars were either wwf, wcw, or ecw. So there was really nobody else for them to push. They were forced to use some talent that was a bit below par and you had your guys like Dundee and Brian Christoper that got pushed. They relied on bringing in wwf guys like Razor Ramon, diesel, or Tatanka to wrestle Jerry Lawler and beat him for the title and drop it back next week. So there was really nothing else they could do in the 90's. They just couldn't pay anybody. The undercard was making 30 dollars a night.
But in the 70's and 80's, At this point in wrestling, each territories had a few mainstays, and the rest were just coming in for 3-6 months and moving on to another territory. That's how everybody's product stayed fresh and nobody got tired of seeing the same guys. So every 6 months or so the landscape of a territory would completely change. So you really couldn't push anybody long term. Add in the fact that they had to fill an 11,000 seat arena not once a month or once a year, but every Monday night. Not to mention the rest of the towns like Louisville, Evansville, Nashville, etc... Those were every week they were running those buildings. So there was really no time to slowly build up angles over a 3 month period. That also was the reason why there were so many title reigns. If it was like the WWF at MSG which they ran once a month, they could milk it for 3 or 4 months or so. But running every week in the same building They had to keep it hot and move it quickly. Nobody ever got the best of Lawler in a feud though unless he was heel. Because the people paid to see Lawler get the best of the heel in the end.
But as far as the names that ran through the territory, again it depends on the time period. Most of the biggest stars in the business have come through there at least once. Once the NWA and WWF went national they took a hit. In the 70's up until the mid 80's, Lawler was making several thousand dollars a week in the Memphis territory. He was making huge money. He owned half the territory as well. So there was really no reason for him to leave. He would've had to take a major pay cut to come to the WWF or to wrestle for Crockett. So a lot of stars would come through Memphis, some for a month, some for a few months etc.. That's just how it was before national wrestling companies. Guys going around the loop and working for different territories and Memphis was a hot stop to make for a lot of guys.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2017 23:41:03 GMT
This is a good topic. It depends on the time period you're asking about. In the 90's, the talent pool was kind of thin because all the top stars were either wwf, wcw, or ecw. So there was really nobody else for them to push. They were forced to use some talent that was a bit below par and you had your guys like Dundee and Brian Christoper that got pushed. They relied on bringing in wwf guys like Razor Ramon, diesel, or Tatanka to wrestle Jerry Lawler and beat him for the title and drop it back next week. So there was really nothing else they could do in the 90's. They just couldn't pay anybody. The undercard was making 30 dollars a night. But in the 70's and 80's, At this point in wrestling, each territories had a few mainstays, and the rest were just coming in for 3-6 months and moving on to another territory. That's how everybody's product stayed fresh and nobody got tired of seeing the same guys. So every 6 months or so the landscape of a territory would completely change. So you really couldn't push anybody long term. Add in the fact that they had to fill an 11,000 seat arena not once a month or once a year, but every Monday night. Not to mention the rest of the towns like Louisville, Evansville, Nashville, etc... Those were every week they were running those buildings. So there was really no time to slowly build up angles over a 3 month period. That also was the reason why there were so many title reigns. If it was like the WWF at MSG which they ran once a month, they could milk it for 3 or 4 months or so. But running every week in the same building They had to keep it hot and move it quickly. Nobody ever got the best of Lawler in a feud though unless he was heel. Because the people paid to see Lawler get the best of the heel in the end. But as far as the names that ran through the territory, again it depends on the time period. Most of the biggest stars in the business have come through there at least once. Once the NWA and WWF went national they took a hit. In the 70's up until the mid 80's, Lawler was making several thousand dollars a week in the Memphis territory. He was making huge money. He owned half the territory as well. So there was really no reason for him to leave. He would've had to take a major pay cut to come to the WWF or to wrestle for Crockett. So a lot of stars would come through Memphis, some for a month, some for a few months etc.. That's just how it was before national wrestling companies. Guys going around the loop and working for different territories and Memphis was a hot stop to make for a lot of guys. what about the Eddie Gilberts, Tommy Rich's, Buddy Landel's of the world? i see some of these cats had a run with Naitch when he would roll threw the territory. can you see any of these guys getting a push over Lawler? i watch some old school clips and you see the likes of 'Taker and Sid roll threw there - and i get they were onto bigger and better things - seems like the above 3 i mentioned were always 'independent icons' so to speak. Ever see the Truman Show with Jim Carrey? Great movie. He was placed in an environment for the world to follow. i guess i find it fascinating to this day - like a lot of people criticize Hogan, Reigns, Cena - Lawler to me seemed like a 'body' and they ran with him. I see nothing special. but obviously there was 'something' as he had staying power and was quite successful. i'd love to see a Lawyer match/shoot/promo etc - where i'm like - 'hey - i get it now'. nope. guess he's just not my cup of tea.
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 23, 2017 23:55:19 GMT
Gilbert, and Rich, and Landel to a certain extent, all had programs with Lawler that did really well. So it was basically the same formula that always worked. They'd get over on Lawler, and Lawler would get his revenge in the end. If Lawler doesn't get his revenge in the end, the fans get their revenge by not coming to the buildings anymore. Taker came through at a time when he was still green and just gaining some experience. Sid also, but came back after the WWF and WCW didn't want him anymore. So basically in the 70's and 80's the place was on fire and guys could make some money. In the late 80's and into the 90's, you had mostly guys that were just breaking in, or guys that were finishing up there careers because there was no money to be made there. Jarrett was able to keep the place in business by only really paying his top few guys.
I had never seen that Truman show you speak of. That does sound kind of interesting. But what you say with Lawler, kind of goes back to what we talked about in the other thread. Bruno was a huge mega star. But he would not get over in the Carolinas, or Florida, or anywhere in the South. The fans would never have accepted him or his style. Maybe Lawler never would've gotten over up North. Who knows. I personally think he could've.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2017 0:34:02 GMT
Gilbert, and Rich, and Landel to a certain extent, all had programs with Lawler that did really well. So it was basically the same formula that always worked. They'd get over on Lawler, and Lawler would get his revenge in the end. If Lawler doesn't get his revenge in the end, the fans get their revenge by not coming to the buildings anymore. Taker came through at a time when he was still green and just gaining some experience. Sid also, but came back after the WWF and WCW didn't want him anymore. So basically in the 70's and 80's the place was on fire and guys could make some money. In the late 80's and into the 90's, you had mostly guys that were just breaking in, or guys that were finishing up there careers because there was no money to be made there. Jarrett was able to keep the place in business by only really paying his top few guys. I had never seen that Truman show you speak of. That does sound kind of interesting. But what you say with Lawler, kind of goes back to what we talked about in the other thread. Bruno was a huge mega star. But he would not get over in the Carolinas, or Florida, or anywhere in the South. The fans would never have accepted him or his style. Maybe Lawler never would've gotten over up North. Who knows. I personally think he could've. awesome segway into a quasi similar topic involving Lawler and getting over 'up North'. OK. so Lawler debuted in WWF around the 'new generation era' correct and had a feud with Hart. this is when Hogan was gone. diesel, ramon, hart, etc were at the top. so here we have this 'legend' from the territories down south - i get they gave him a push, air time, etc - but if he was that 'guy' don't you think maybe WWF would have given him the strap? was it a missed opportunity? like Von Erich coming in and not getting the proper push? at least they gave Flair the strap when he came in. here's this 'Indy Icon' coming in - and well - i don't know - to me he looked like a boob in his robe and king's hat and was never really a threat. people bash the 'new generation' of hart, hbk, diesel, etc - you'd think if Lawler was such a legend they would have saw it and put the belt on him and he'd run with it.
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 24, 2017 1:00:41 GMT
I don't think they really had any interest in Lawler at any point in his career. Possibly for his style, his size, and being a southern guy. But you have to remember that by the time Lawler made it into the WWF in 1993, he was already 44 years old. He was still capable of having damn good matches, and he did in Memphis around that same time. But a run on top in the WWF just wasn't going to happen at that point. He had aged, had kind of a gut, and looked like an aging star. The robe and the hat and all that was kind of silly looking. That was more of a WWF thing and not something he really did much in Memphis or any place else. When Lawler was really at his best was around the late 70's up until the late 80's when he had the AWA title win around that superclash time. On a side note, they brought the Hart/Lawler feud over to Memphis with Lawler as the face and Vince and Brett coming in as heels and I liked those matches better than their wwf matches.
But that was an interesting time to watch the programs. It made for some great interviews back and forth with Bill Dundee and Lawler on Memphis tv. He'd give him crap for selling out and putting on the mickey mouse suit and going into the wwf. Lawler would say he did that to make some money but he came back to his real home every monday night to wrestle at the mid south coliseum. He was still over as a face in Memphis but some people didn't like seeing him as heel in the wwf on cable tv which everybody had by that point.
|
|
kaasa
Sophomore
@kaasa
Posts: 283
Likes: 72
|
Post by kaasa on May 24, 2017 18:14:10 GMT
If Bob Backlund could be Champion in '94 then so could Jerry Lawler. Vince probably never seriously considered it because around that time he began his ageist propaganda. Putting the belt on two average looking older guys would have been going against the message about the young, youthful talent Vince was trying to get across. And the other reason being those sexual allegations against him which kind of sullied Jerry's reputation. He's never been able to shake that off.
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 25, 2017 3:13:06 GMT
But also remember he lost the belt rather quickly in something like a 9 minute squash. We wouldn't want that for the king lol. But in all seriousness, if you remember back to Randy Savage in the early 90's that was a big thing with him. Vince thought he was too old at that point in 1993. I thought that was ridiculous because the guy could still go like he always did at the point.
|
|
|
Post by shadyvsesham on May 27, 2017 17:01:00 GMT
Jim Cornette (Love his show, talking with Cornette.) makes you respect the territory days. Lawler was basically carrying the Memphis territory.
I remember Cornette telling an amazing story on the Macho Man. Jim had a top heel in his territory, and like Jahyn was saying he would depend on him getting a few WWF guys. (Mid to low carders, so they get a little extra cash). One time he got the Macho Man. He booked him against his top heel. Macho came up to Jim and said,"who is your top guy." Jim told him and Macho asked how he felt about letting his top heel over Macho. He was like Im only here for one night, why not give him some buzz? Jim was of course shocked and was like youll do that?
So he did, and apparently it basically made that heels day. I wish I remember what video it was because idk why, it was an amazing story. OT I know.
Yea, apparently Lawler just carried his territory. I dont think, as WWF fans, we saw the best of Jerry. Yea, I would not have wanna seen Lawler lose the title to Diesel in a fn 9 second match.
*Bell rings, kick in the gut, powerbomb, 1-2-3.*
That was the fn match folks! (With Backlund Vs Diesel)
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on May 29, 2017 4:40:55 GMT
Yeah Lawler was Memphis and it worked. If the guy can make over a quarter of a million dollars a year in that territory that tells you something. none of the wwf fans that only saw him there could really grasp the legendary status of the king. To them, he was just some goofy announce guy. And that in no way shape or form defined his real wrestling career that he had all throughout the 70's and 80's drawing huge money. But That's a great story about Savage. I hadn't heard that one. To me he was still great at that point and Vince I guess didn't care if he put somebody else over because he wasn't going to use him on top.
|
|