|
Post by mstreepsucks on Apr 27, 2022 5:28:10 GMT
Well the diversity check mark, didn't exist back then. I don't believe so anyway. If it did, it didn't for him since he had creative control.
But the difference is, he actually choose how to use diversity himself if he decided to do that at all.
Which is why it worked so well.
. Unlike directors of today who don't choose it themselves. The company does that. Imo.
And that might be absolutely true. But why would it bother you unless you had a problem with women and black people? Stop to think about that. What difference does it really make outside of that? It a non issue that they want to give other types of people a chance. Question: when did diversity in some films become as issue that some people argue about?
Answer: when forced diversity became a thing that they do.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Apr 27, 2022 13:24:26 GMT
And that might be absolutely true. But why would it bother you unless you had a problem with women and black people? Stop to think about that. What difference does it really make outside of that? It a non issue that they want to give other types of people a chance. Question: when did diversity in some films become as issue that some people argue about?
Answer: when forced diversity became a thing that they do.
Questions: Why do you care either way? Why do you post several other threads about the same issue? Why do you persist with this? Answer: Because on some level you have some underlying issue with women and people of color. If it weren't for that, it would be the non issue that it is.
|
|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on Apr 27, 2022 15:38:06 GMT
Well, I clearly don't like their type of 'diversity' that they do today.
It actually isn't a race issue though. Because when they do that with white women. I have the same problems with it. Exactly the same problems with it. In these films, they do both.
If they would have chosen just to have one of those things instead of both of them. I probably wouldn't be bothered as much. I don't think I'm the only one either, it's just most people are afraid to complain about it.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Apr 27, 2022 17:24:48 GMT
Question: when did diversity in some films become as issue that some people argue about?
Answer: when forced diversity became a thing that they do.
Questions: Why do you care either way? Why do post several other threads about the issue? Why do you persist with this? Answer: Because on some level you have some underlying issue with women and people of color. If it weren't for that, it would be the non issue that it is. He’s a shitposter. You’re wasting your time.
|
|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on Apr 28, 2022 7:10:00 GMT
Question: when did diversity in some films become as issue that some people argue about?
Answer: when forced diversity became a thing that they do.
Questions: Why do you care either way? Why do you post several other threads about the same issue? Why do you persist with this? Answer: Because on some level you have some underlying issue with women and people of color. If it weren't for that, it would be the non issue that it is. Would you happen to agree with me when I sum up the problems with diversity, in the sequel trilogy by saying this:
It's basically a calico of problems?
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Apr 28, 2022 17:18:54 GMT
Questions: Why do you care either way? Why do you post several other threads about the same issue? Why do you persist with this? Answer: Because on some level you have some underlying issue with women and people of color. If it weren't for that, it would be the non issue that it is. Would you happen to agree with me when I sum up the problems with diversity, in the sequel trilogy by saying this:
It's basically a calico of problems?
I would not. I don't have a problem with diversity. Even if we agreed that it was a forced check marked kind of diversity I still wouldn't have a problem with it. When it comes down to it there's no REAL, logical, reason to have a problem with a woman or person of color being the lead in anything.
|
|