|
|
Post by msdemos on Mar 17, 2022 5:10:29 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Mar 17, 2022 5:31:51 GMT
Indifference is what i feel about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Mar 17, 2022 5:33:56 GMT
As long as it's not in your face, I don't really care. Sometimes they go overboard.
|
|
|
|
Post by Penn Guinn on Mar 17, 2022 5:37:12 GMT
As long as it's not in your face, I don't really care. Sometimes they go overboard. and then it's usually  in all it's many manifestations .. bottles, signage, machines, glasses etc etc etc !
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Mar 17, 2022 6:23:52 GMT
Doesn’t bother me.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Mar 17, 2022 6:25:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Mar 17, 2022 11:17:05 GMT
I think it’s hilarious, especially when overdone. The 80s and 90s were pretty notorious for this.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Mar 17, 2022 11:55:03 GMT
Don't mind it, unless it goes too far.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 17, 2022 13:33:32 GMT
I generally don’t care. When it’s done without subtlety, it’s actually kind of funny.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 17, 2022 14:02:00 GMT
Doesn't bother me at all. I think it's weirder when movies/tv use fictitious brands/services as opposed to real ones.
|
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Mar 17, 2022 15:39:13 GMT
I'm fine with it, if it does help calibrate reality or whatever... My fav is Superman - Cheerios  Classic. |
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Mar 17, 2022 15:40:50 GMT
The sneaky one is car brandings...
When you see one Ford or GM car in a movie, you start seeing dozens of them to follow.
|
|
|
|
Post by ghostintheshell on Mar 17, 2022 20:14:25 GMT
It's no biggie, having branded stuff around is completely normal but it gets annoying when studios highlight logos and make it look like a product commercial.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 17, 2022 22:20:08 GMT
I think it was Michael Bay who said that it was to allow for greater realism. I guess they don’t mind seeing their stuff blown the hell up in his movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Mar 17, 2022 22:57:50 GMT
I think it was Michael Bay who said that it was to allow for greater realism. I guess they don’t mind seeing their stuff blown the hell up in his movies. Hang on, when did Michael Bay start striving for greater realism? 
|
|
|
|
Post by tastytomatoes on Mar 17, 2022 23:55:33 GMT
I think it was Michael Bay who said that it was to allow for greater realism. I guess they don’t mind seeing their stuff blown the hell up in his movies. Hang on, when did Michael Bay start striving for greater realism? He was pissed that No Time to Die set the Guinness World Record for the largest film stunt explosion 
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Mar 22, 2022 14:19:33 GMT
The sneaky one is car brandings... When you see one Ford or GM car in a movie, you start seeing dozens of them to follow. Live and Let Die was hilarious with this. Near the beginning every car just about is a 1973 Chevrolet. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 22, 2022 16:00:59 GMT
I think it was Michael Bay who said that it was to allow for greater realism. I guess they don’t mind seeing their stuff blown the hell up in his movies. Hang on, when did Michael Bay start striving for greater realism? Whenever it looks like he’s about to incinerate his entire cast for the perfect explosion. |
|
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12816683/pizza-movies-7.0.0.1412855630.jpg)
