|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on May 30, 2017 11:10:03 GMT
finally stumped up enough money to pay for the positive reviews
only messing, just remember the DCEU zealots saying that all the positive reviews Marvel recieved was paid for by Disney.
yeah, those bickering DC zealots and Marvel maggots, it's quite a shame, old fiend.
Btw didn't you predict that Wonder Woman would "flopp harder than an old woman's tits", or respectively, "flop harder than your dick when seeing DC Fan's mom"...?
Never tell us the odds, furious...
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on May 30, 2017 11:20:09 GMT
yeah, those bickering DC zealots and Marvel maggots, it's quite a shame, old fiend.
Btw didn't you predict that Wonder Woman would "flopp harder than an old woman's tits", or respectively, "flop harder than your dick when seeing DC Fan's mom"...?
Never tell us the odds, furious...
anything below 650 is a massive big fat titted flop well, considering WonderWoman's precious physique, you might apply the wrong standard in the first place...not saying your flopping dick would be the right one either though.
|
|
|
|
Post by sostie on May 30, 2017 12:30:39 GMT
Of course this is as ridiculous and unbelievable as Marvel bribing reviewers, though there is something a little "odd" afoot...
For about a month the WW poster in the UK has appeared with four star rating from daily tabloid shit-rag The Daily Star and the quote "Superhero Movie Of The Year". Apart from being a ridiculous quote (still a number of big superhero films to be released this year) how was the Daily Star able to provide a 4 star rating nearly a month before the film was reviewed?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on May 30, 2017 12:37:36 GMT
well, considering WonderWoman's precious physique, you might apply the wrong standard in the first place...not saying your flopping dick would be the right one either though.
it will flop as big as my dick would on prom night sorry to hear about the big flopping on your prom night; don't fret, it happens to the best, man.
As for the movie, despite this happening to all female led CBM so far, it looks like all that will be flopping is your impotent prediction, furious.
|
|
chatterer
Sophomore
@chatterer
Posts: 272
Likes: 112
 
|
Post by chatterer on May 30, 2017 16:04:14 GMT
Of course this is as ridiculous and unbelievable as Marvel bribing reviewers, though there is something a little "odd" afoot... For about a month the WW poster in the UK has appeared with four star rating from daily tabloid shit-rag The Daily Star and the quote "Superhero Movie Of The Year". Apart from being a ridiculous quote (still a number of big superhero films to be released this year) how was the Daily Star able to provide a 4 star rating nearly a month before the film was reviewed? I believe Andy Lea saw a early screening. Apparently his review was out by 10th of May when did the posters start to appear? |
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on May 30, 2017 17:46:01 GMT
finally stumped up enough money to pay for the positive reviews
only messing, just remember the DCEU zealots saying that all the positive reviews Marvel recieved was paid for by Disney.
Neither of them pay for reviews. Marvel is just more massively appealing. |
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Jun 1, 2017 3:08:42 GMT
reviewers don't want to be called sexist
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jun 1, 2017 16:05:48 GMT
You know what's funny? Reading the reviews for WW, it's almost like it was a review for an MCU movie.
- Weakly developed villains but very strongly developed protagonists
- A comedic sidekick
- Allowing the protagonist scenes where they just enjoy frivolous, normal activities of everyday life (like eating icecream)
- a very impressive mid-movie fight and a less than stellar end fight
- fight scenes that focus on defending the less fortunate
- nice, fun humor
- a hero who does good because she's inherently good
I haven't watched the movie yet, I'm just basing these from the reviews I've read. Seems this movie has more in common with MCU movies than DCEU movies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2017 3:33:54 GMT
You know what's funny? Reading the reviews for WW, it's almost like it was a review for an MCU movie. - Weakly developed villains but very strongly developed protagonists - A comedic sidekick - Allowing the protagonist scenes where they just enjoy frivolous, normal activities of everyday life (like eating icecream) - a very impressive mid-movie fight and a less than stellar end fight - fight scenes that focus on defending the less fortunate - nice, fun humor - a hero who does good because she's inherently good I haven't watched the movie yet, I'm just basing these from the reviews I've read. Seems this movie has more in common with MCU movies than DCEU movies. Ah, that would explain why its actually a good movie. |
|
Stuart "2-D" Pot
Sophomore
Guess who's back?
@startrekkie1202
Posts: 315
Likes: 71
|
Post by Stuart "2-D" Pot on Jun 2, 2017 12:27:53 GMT
You know what's funny? Reading the reviews for WW, it's almost like it was a review for an MCU movie. - Weakly developed villains but very strongly developed protagonists - A comedic sidekick - Allowing the protagonist scenes where they just enjoy frivolous, normal activities of everyday life (like eating icecream) - a very impressive mid-movie fight and a less than stellar end fight - fight scenes that focus on defending the less fortunate - nice, fun humor - a hero who does good because she's inherently good I haven't watched the movie yet, I'm just basing these from the reviews I've read. Seems this movie has more in common with MCU movies than DCEU movies. Ah, that would explain why its actually a good movie. You've seen WW? Or are you just going with what the reviews are saying? |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jun 2, 2017 15:28:14 GMT
Ah, that would explain why its actually a good movie. You've seen WW? Or are you just going with what the reviews are saying? I haven't watched it, will do so on Sunday. I'm only basing this from what I'm reading on the reviews. |
|
