Ok, let's go through these, assuming they weren't meant to be rhetorical:
How is using your free speech rights to say you believe that a tennis arena shouldn't be named after a homophobe and a racist intolerant?
Because you aren't simply exercising your freedom of speech to condemn her and say how offended you are, you are trying to impose your morality on a publicly funded organisation to get it to change something. If a Muslim tried to do that, you'd be up in arms.
How is using your democratic freedom to organise a boycott of Tennis Australia events forcing them to do anything?
Because the whole point of organising a boycott is to put pressure on somebody to do something they wouldn't do otherwise. What other purpose does a boycott have?
What business of it of yours if people choose not to spend their own money at an arena named after a women who's views they find repellent?
None at all. However it does become my business when they start trying to force their morality on a publicly funded organisation to change something they don't like because somebody said something that hurt their sensitive widdle feelings. I repeat if Muslims did that because they found something morally repellent that you didn't, you'd be up in arms, so stop being such a hypocrite.
Why should the lesbian or black taxpayers of Australia be forced to contribute towards an arena named after women who is obviously prejudiced against them.
Because the money is being contributed to improve tennis skills, and the name of the arena is completely irrelevant as far as that aim is concerned. You might as well ask why they should contribute towards the arena if they don't play tennis. Or if they don't live in Melbourne. Or if they are Muslim, for that matter! (Do we know what Margaret Court thought about Muslims?)
You're a fucking idiot mate,and the uphill struggle is getting you to see the absurdity of your stated position.
Oh dear, you are getting angry again. You sounded almost normal there for a while.&nbs