|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on May 4, 2020 3:15:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lostinlimbo on May 4, 2020 8:20:29 GMT
Typical late-night cable erotic-thriller with Shannon Tweed. She manipulates a family who she blames for her husbands death by sleeping with the peeping tom son, then the father (while the son jealously peeps on) and drugging the poor mother. She virtually goes psychotic, knife happy when her devious plan is discovered by the end. Average Swedish haunted house story. Kinda slow and uneventful (think Amityville Horror), yet can be goofy with questionable actions, dialogues and side characters. There are only a few spooky atmospheric moments, but they’re during the quiet moments as the score was a mood destroyer. Also the English dub was amusingly bad too. I wish it was exciting, and suspenseful like the trailer portrays.
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on May 4, 2020 12:23:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gspdude on May 5, 2020 19:59:01 GMT
Spring(2014) American guy visiting Italy is drawn to a young beauty with a dark secret. A romance/horror with more emphasis on the romance than the horror, but it's well done and I think most genre fans will like it. 7/10
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on May 6, 2020 7:08:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on May 6, 2020 14:50:33 GMT
Recently saw Urban Legends II: The Final Cut (2000) which somehow reminded me of those sleazy italian giallo/slashers of the 80s, such as Murder Rock (1986) and so on, where competitive students go, well all the way and so on, in order to get their hands on the golden "ticket" to travel towards Hollywood and become a star.
Anway, I was not exactly a huge fan of the first one, in fact I felt asleep several times, and the sequel is surely one of the few times these late 90s/early 00s have managed to go one step above and either been better or more entertaining than the first one, and I guess more enjoyable is what fits in with The Final Cut.
5,5/10
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on May 6, 2020 17:57:55 GMT
" Suggested Retail Price $ 79.95 "
WHOA ! That was actually a very expense film on VHS for back in the day too .
Most likely had to wait 6 months to a year or so until it can be
purchased at a most reasonable price of $ 10. to $ 12. dollars ( oh yes those were the days ! ) .
It does look like a really crazy horror fun movie to watch
on either Halloween night or
on a regular weekend night with popcorn indeed .
Surprisingly I have never heard of the title or seen this one before .
Thanks so much FridayOnElmStreet for this really cool VHS Cover Pic
and for this movie recommendation here too .
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on May 6, 2020 18:11:40 GMT
I actually saw this film ( new ) last year at the Drive-In and I believe to my recollection it was paired up with
this film too .
Thanks much Chalice_Of_Evil for these really cool pic selections
and for this movie reminder here too .
|
|
|
Post by forca84 on May 6, 2020 19:57:15 GMT
"The Quiet Ones" (2014) "Better watch out" (2016)
Both on Prime. Both rather good. Not sure I'd watch them again tho.
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on May 6, 2020 20:35:34 GMT
" Suggested Retail Price $ 79.95 "
WHOA ! That was actually a very expense film on VHS for back in the day too .
Most likely had to wait 6 months to a year or so until it can be
purchased at a most reasonable price of $ 10. to $ 12. dollars ( oh yes those were the days ! ) .
It does look like a really crazy horror fun movie to watch
on either Halloween night or
on a regular weekend night with popcorn indeed .
Surprisingly I have never heard of the title or seen this one before .
Thanks so much FridayOnElmStreet for this really cool VHS Cover Pic
and for this movie recommendation here too .
I got the film from Youtube. I could not find a VHS for sale so it may be so rare that it still may be worth 80 bucks. I give the film a 5/10. Its amusing but nothing great. Good to see once. Its weird at times. One scenes has a guy in a crowd doing a minute of random stand up. Another scene a random music video breaks out. Its really nuts.
|
|
TheSowIsMine
Junior Member
@thesowismine
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 1,746
|
Post by TheSowIsMine on May 6, 2020 22:10:49 GMT
The Lodge (2019)
It was ok, not as special as people make it out to be.
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on May 7, 2020 3:28:02 GMT
" Suggested Retail Price $ 79.95 "
WHOA ! That was actually a very expense film on VHS for back in the day too .
Most likely had to wait 6 months to a year or so until it can be
purchased at a most reasonable price of $ 10. to $ 12. dollars ( oh yes those were the days ! ) .
It does look like a really crazy horror fun movie to watch
on either Halloween night or
on a regular weekend night with popcorn indeed .
Surprisingly I have never heard of the title or seen this one before .
Thanks so much FridayOnElmStreet for this really cool VHS Cover Pic
and for this movie recommendation here too .
I got the film from Youtube. I could not find a VHS for sale so it may be so rare that it still may be worth 80 bucks. I give the film a 5/10. Its amusing but nothing great. Good to see once. Its weird at times. One scenes has a guy in a crowd doing a minute of random stand up. Another scene a random music video breaks out. Its really nuts.
I have noticed over the years that the 1970's and 80's
usually did have " one of a kind " crazy insane flicks like this one .
Which was most likely why back then these films
were almost always shown well after 12am or 2am on TV
or was only available to rent from the old video stores also .
Thanks so much again FridayOnElmStreet for your reply here too .
|
|
|
Post by forca84 on May 7, 2020 22:10:05 GMT
"My super ex Girlfriend" "The trials of Kate McCall" The classic film noir "Scarlet Street"
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on May 8, 2020 18:34:12 GMT
Not so much horror, but still have horror and thrills elements: The Canterville Ghost 1944, with Charles Laughton as the more scared than scary ghost. The Cat and the Canary 1939 starring Bob Hope and the beautiful Paulette Goddard, this one works because the horror and threat is real, since there really is a lunaitic running around in the Louisiana swamps, it is a comedy but a comedy works best if there is a real threat. George Zucco and Gale Sondergard is around too, to stir things up.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on May 9, 2020 9:04:20 GMT
Not so much horror, but still have horror and thrills elementsI would say, just by looking at these great pictures/images that you have posted, they all come with that elegant, yet classic horror feel of the 30s and 40s with them, and would have likely have been looking very good as potential movie posters or just framing them up as they are, on the wall. My favorite of the 3 you posted, are surely the one in the middle, that looked very impressive, specially the actors facial expressions and I might have to check out these films.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on May 9, 2020 9:55:10 GMT
Resurrection (1999) - Russel Mulchay I have only seen this very typical late 90s crime-thriller once before, and this one surely tries hard in style and tone to "cash in" on the success of several serial-thrillers of the mid 90s, such as Se7en (1995) and Copycat (1995). But there is also a bit of The Silence of the Lambs (1991) vibe going on strong, at least a few times, I think. Of course, this is probably a far more low budget or tv-movie made film, that still manages to be, well, maybe better is not exactly the right word when it comes to Christopher Lambert and his acting, but compared to so much of the awful films he usally makes, I think this one of the few times I was left postively surprised. It is fast paced, gory, nasty, stylish, and at times very funny, but I just wished there was a bit more, how should you say, originality to the script and its characters, because, I am not saying a "great" movie lie between the pages or something like that, but it could surely have become a little more sharper in both tone, and story. Lambert sure does his best, but again, it kind of feels a little to over-the-top, and which brings some of the more overused thriller cliches into being almost unintentional funny, than what they were meant to be. Of course, there is lots of walking cliches in this one, the tragic main character, his caring and lonely wife, their sad backstory, the wisecracking partner and sidekick, the angry and explosive police chief, the douchy asshole co-workers, the creepy looking killer with his huge bug eyes and constant intense stare, the grungy green-grey use of colors, the constant heavy rain showering the city and streets, and showing far too much of all these horrible dead bodies or body parts, and yeah, sometimes those who are not even dead, just dying and, well, I tend to prefer movies such as Manhunter (1986), specially when it comes to not show "everything", all the time. Let the fantasy or imagination play their part, because what you often do not see, is way more scary or effective (or so I believe), than being constantly thrown all these horrific and gory images of mutilated bodies and victims of the killer. Also, when I think of wandering cliches, the serial killer is quite a piece of "work" himself, I mean the religous themes, the use of numbers, digitals and other obvious clues, such as windows or walls, being smeared in with blood in huge red letters "COME FIND ME!" and then Lamberts charactert begin this long and very serious speech about that this means the killer is serious and will surely continue on with his murdering, and it just, well, was so laughable and funny (sure not meant to be) that it felt like a parody of the crime-thrillere genre at times. Another reason to why I have a certain soft spot for the film, is that one of my favorite directors, David Cronenberg also has a small part in here, as a local priest. Nothing huge or really special, but I thought it was nice little role from Cronenbergs side, and he did it pretty good. The one thing I would have really liked, and I think could have done this movie a huge favor, was surprising the viewer with a bit a of a shock, and I do not mean more blood and gore, but because somewhere along the way, especially when Lamberts character began discussing with his wisecracking partner and friend, about how he "admired" the intellect of the serial killer, and his partner, I always hoped or suspected would turn out as the bad guy, and he for a few moments looked very creepy, when Lambert started the whole admiring part, but sadly I guess that whole potential just got thrown away, and it was back the more creepy looking, sterotypical Hollywood serial killer kind of type, and again, that is why I love Manhunter and constantly brings it up, as how I wished more thrillers would deliver their serial killer. Brian Cox looks just like a "normal" guy, with a very non-normal way of personality, while most of the Hollywood serial killer figures looks like they just stumbled out of the assembly line for "movie serial killer" or "creepy movie monsters", and they just do absolutely nothing for me. They are rarely ever scary or impressive, just most of the time dull and I have seen them so many times over, so just come up with something a little different, as I like to think normal is way more scarier or unsettling than having yet another cheap looking rip-off of the legendary Dr. Hannibal Lecter (the Anthony Hopkins version). Anyway, I enjoyed the movie, not great by any means, but entertaining and surely one of the better films that Christopher Lambert made during the late 90s. 6/10
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on May 11, 2020 9:23:36 GMT
Elvira's Haunted Hills (2001) by Sam Irvin I guess this one is not really a "sequel", more just a new kind of movie involving Elvira (Cassandra Peterson) and this time she is back the 1850s, and along with her chamber maid they must stay the night (in fact several) in some creepy old castle, where a bunch rather colorful figures soon appears. Anyway, I have seen it once before, and, well it was surely not even close of being as funny or charming as the first one, Elvira: Mistress of the Dark (1988), who combined sexy slapstick comedy, b-movie charm and I thought Cassandra did a great job, but many years later on, the whole horror-comedy vulgar-sexy slapstick routine has just grown very tiredsome and feels more cheap and annoying, than even coming close to "funny" or entertaining. How many times can they can the keep on repeating the same "joke", (which was never really funny to begin with) of having Elvira shoving her funbags into other peoples faces, or having them grab a good hold of them, again and again. Well, one scene had a bit of charm " It is a good thing that I come with my own airbags" or something like that, when some creepy Dr. characters stumbles right into her boobies when driving to the gothic castle earlier in the film. Sadly, it is one very few highlights, as already in the opening scene, the "standard" of comedy has been set, when Elvira and her chamber maid must flea the scene, of some sleazy motel, and the owner surely is wanting his money: "I WANT MY MOOONEY, I WANT MY MONEY!" then this "funny" line or horrible joke, just goes on, forever and I knew then that it was not gonna be a very good movie, and sadly I was right. But, I do love Elvira, at least the 80s version, but Cassandra sure looks still stunning in this one, and I just wish they hired better writers, but I guess Peterson actually was one of the two who penned down the script, so maybe that was part of the problem. The positive things, I liked the classic comedy horror gothic look, specially the castle and clothes, hairstyles and the atmosphere (at times), so maybe as I said, if they had got a better script and maybe a little more money/budget behind it, this movie could have been so much better. 4/10
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on May 11, 2020 9:38:17 GMT
Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 Second watch since about a decade ago. Fucking balls to the wall entertainment with awesome work by Tom Savini! Without a doubt my favorite entry in the franchise behind the original. I don’t think I fully appreciated this my first watch but man I’m glad I decided to revisit. Amazing set pieces, great gore and unforgettable characters sprinkled with genuinely funny moments. Rating 4/5 Sorry about bumping your reply, so long after, but I re-watched Texas Chainssaw Massacre 2 (1986) earlier this year, and I just loved it! Had almost forgotten how crazy and funny it really was, I specially loved Dennis Hopper, who completely owned this movie, and to think he did both this and Blue Velvet both released in 1986, damn, he was in good form back then. "BRIIIIIIING IIIIIT AAAAAAALL DOOOOOOOWN!"The one scene, that had me almost on the floor laughing, was the part where he went out to buy himself a big ass chainssaw, and the owner of the store, looks at this madman with huge admiration, and it was just such a hilarious but great part. Another huge reason to why I love the film, was the beautiful Caroline Williams, and I just fell so hard for her whole charming Texas accent and those long stunning legs of hers. Damn she was fine, and I had absolute no problems with Leatherface also having a thing for her, because who wouldn't? Tom Savini of course, surely did not do any wrong here either, incredible special effects all the way. Anyway, it was sure great to get to see it again, after so long and I know, I must get a hold of the original, as I have not watched it since the early 00s, but from what I remember, that tone or style was completely different, and this sequel was just so over-the-top and ridiculous fun, that, well it has to be one of the best horror sequels of the 80s, or so I believe.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on May 11, 2020 9:53:49 GMT
Double shot last night of two very different extremes. Both re-watches. A great ensemble cast really carry this goofball comedy-horror. Charming, although I do find it to lose steam by the end. The story might be muddled and anticlimactic, but the set-designs and practical fx looks good in this Roger Corman production. Oh, and of course a WTF moment here and there. Again, sorry about bumping these "old" posts, but I have lost so much time on here from my "vacation", and just love going backwards and reading up on all these fine reviews and images/posters people have posted and written down earlier on. I just love that Transylvania 6-5000 (1985) movie poster, and so much, in fact that I have it on VHS and DVD (4 different versions) and where I think the nordic/scandinavian ones are completely superior to the incredible dull and boring looking Anchor Bay/Starz edition, which looks so cheap and is just made up of two huge random pictures of Jeff Goldblum and Ed Begley Jr., but the other movie poster are so much fun and creative, and well, I so very much want it hanging on my wall as a framed poster. But, then again, I wouldn't mind a big framed poster of Gena Davis as the lovely vamp-nympho Odette as well. Galaxy of Terror I remember as well because of the incredible sets and designs, which I thought were very impressive, specially for a Roger Corman production, but if I am not mistaken, I think a very young James Cameron was involved in this, and I guess the whole Alien (1979) feel, sure make well use of that kind of talent. Yeah, there were some rather, WTF moments in there as well, and I guess that is why so many remember it.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on May 11, 2020 10:06:27 GMT
Fright Night (1985) This is one of those must-watch movies for me during the month of January. Not sure why, but it seems to go well against the snow and cold. It's always a blast and I'm always finding new things to appreciate about it. Chris Sarandon and Amanda Bearse's hypnotic dance, the dynamic score by Brad Fiedel, the state-of-the-art (at the time) practical effects, the references to Hammer-era horror... I just really, really love this movie to pieces. 10/10 That has to be one of the coolest and most impressive movie posters (not just horror) of the 1980s, I guess so much, several ones later "borrowed" it, such as the Return of the Living Dead Part: II (1988), but that film is of course not even close of the classic that is Fright Night. For me, I usually tend to watch it during the late summer, I do not know why, but it has just ended up that way, and still a great movie, is still great movie no matter when or where I see it. What I love more and more about each viewing, is that it just keeps on getting better and more rewarding for each time, and that is why I guess it holds such a special place for so many fans of it. I did watch the remake a few years back, and it was not awful, but I felt it never came even close, once, to match the comedy, horror, atmosphere, music or special effects, and Colin Farrell I thought was, well not horrible, just bland and completely forgettable which I felt also the movie pretty much could be summed out to be as well.
|
|