|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 6, 2017 9:04:15 GMT
Nope.It's not diversity to just put a few female characters in supporting roles in movies or lead roles Most of the female roles in Marvel films are bigger than the examples of non-caucasian roles in DC films you provided. You go on and on about the lack of diversity in Marvel Films but for you it seems your idea of diversity is more or bigger female roles. Despite the fact that MCU has given way more strong, female characters than DCEU has. But diversity isn't just about sex of characters. When is the first non-Caucasian led DCEU film going to be announced? DC has notoriously always been behind Marvel, whether on screen or comics when dealing with non-white characters. Even the first film produced by Marvel starred a black character - Blade. So when you harp on about diversity, stop being so narrow minded in it's definition. DCEU has already made a film with a non-Caucasian lead. Will Smith (a non-Caucasian) and Margot Robbie (a woman) are clearly the 2 lead characters in Suicide Squad (the DCEU's 3rd movie). And in addition to making the best female-led superhero movie ever, DCEU has also announced Cyborg and Black Adam movies in addition to the Batgirl and Gotham City Sirens movies. And a Wonder Woman sequel will most certainly be coming and could be announced at this year's Comic-Con.
Meanwhile, MCU will have had 17 movies by the end of this year, and the lead character in all 17 movies has been a Caucasian male. Way to promote diversity!
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Jun 6, 2017 9:38:50 GMT
Nope.It's not diversity to just put a few female characters in supporting roles in movies or lead roles Most of the female roles in Marvel films are bigger than the examples of non-caucasian roles in DC films you provided. You go on and on about the lack of diversity in Marvel Films but for you it seems your idea of diversity is more or bigger female roles. Despite the fact that MCU has given way more strong, female characters than DCEU has.But diversity isn't just about sex of characters. When is the first non-Caucasian led DCEU film going to be announced? DC has notoriously always been behind Marvel, whether on screen or comics when dealing with non-white characters. Even the first film produced by Marvel starred a black character - Blade. So when you harp on about diversity, stop being so narrow minded in it's definition. I cannot follow what you are saying, at least based on the facts.
- DCEU has 4 movies to date, right? MCU has 15, if I count correctly.
- One of the 4 DCEU movies has a female lead (WW). MCU with 15 movies has none, right..? One DCEU film even has a female main antagonist/villain. MCU has none, right...?
- One of the 4 DCEU movies already has a non white lead (if you count W Smith as that, which you should) - [DC even has a non white female superhero movie, but I digress]. MCU has none, right...? (please dont even try to argue that Antman or Ironman actors are somehow not white guys...)
I am not very good with the laws of averages, but it seems that in this diversity equasion DCEU is clearly ahead of MCU.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 6, 2017 9:48:54 GMT
Most of the female roles in Marvel films are bigger than the examples of non-caucasian roles in DC films you provided. You go on and on about the lack of diversity in Marvel Films but for you it seems your idea of diversity is more or bigger female roles. Despite the fact that MCU has given way more strong, female characters than DCEU has. But diversity isn't just about sex of characters. When is the first non-Caucasian led DCEU film going to be announced? DC has notoriously always been behind Marvel, whether on screen or comics when dealing with non-white characters. Even the first film produced by Marvel starred a black character - Blade. So when you harp on about diversity, stop being so narrow minded in it's definition. DCEU has already made a film with a non-Caucasian lead. Will Smith (a non-Caucasian) and Margot Robbie (a woman) are clearly the 2 lead characters in Suicide Squad (the DCEU's 3rd movie). And in addition to making the best female-led superhero movie ever, DCEU has also announced Cyborg and Black Adam movies in addition to the Batgirl and Gotham City Sirens movies. And a Wonder Woman sequel will most certainly be coming and could be announced at this year's Comic-Con.
Meanwhile, MCU will have had 17 movies by the end of this year, and the lead character in all 17 movies has been a Caucasian male. Way to promote diversity!
No, they were the most famous actors in an ensemble piece. It wasn't Deadshot The Movie or Harley Quinn The Movie. Therr roles are as big as Black Widows or Falcon's in some of the MCU films. And let's not kid ourselves into thinking this was some bold foray into diversity. Deadshot is black only because they could get a Box Office draw like Smith to play him - the character has otherwise always been white. As for Harley Quinn - yeah there is a female role, one which in both the film and it's promotion, is sold as a sex object pandering to teen fanboy wank fantasies - there's a strong female role model for you, a psycho criminal in skimpy clothes who is supplicant to, and fawns over her boyfriend. Supergirl, Elektra and Catwoman - such a high standard to meet. It's one thing saying, another thing doing. Marvel with Black Panther are doing. And Black Adam isn't actually black. Yes they cast a non-caucasian in Dwayne Johnson, but that has nothing to do with diversity, and more to do with box office. Cyborg, if it goes ahead, is years away, and it's interesting that he has been accused of being a rip-off of Marvel's Deathlok who has already made it to the small screen. Well using your criteria - actors playing characters a different race to the comic book counterpart, members of teams counting as leads...how about Guardians Of The Galaxy? A green woman played by woman of Dominican/Puerto Rica descent, a Blue man played by a man of Greek/Filipino decent and a squirrel and a tree. That's diversity for you.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 6, 2017 11:50:33 GMT
- One of the 4 DCEU movies has a female lead (WW). MCU with 15 movies has none, right..? One DCEU film even has a female main antagonist/villain. MCU has none, right...?
Yes it has one lead. DC-Fan is claiming that MCU is not diverse based on this one fact, despite MCU films having numerous strong, positive female characters in decent sized roles, many recurring - Black Widow, Frigga, Sif, Peggy Carter, Maria Hill, Sharon Carter, Scarlet Witch, Gamora, Nebula, plus the "non-hero" roles Pepper Potts, Betty Ross, Hope van Dyne, Christine Palmer - all strong intellligent female characters. DC has given us Wonder Woman of course, and having not seen the film yet I'm sure that there are some Amazon characters in there. Other than that...Lois Lane, Martha Kent I suppose, Harley Quinn (a positive female role?), Amanda Waller (frankly a scumbag) Katana, Enchantress (though most of the time a "bad guy") "Diversity" in films is only really of any significance if the roles are positive - perhaps why I cast a little doubt over Amanda Waller and Enchantress As mentioned in an earlier reply Smith's casting has nothing to do with diversity (a white comic character cast as black) and more to do with Box Office (I assume the non white female superhero is Catwoman? if so this applies to her as well) . But MCU has been diverse with positive no-Caucasian characters - War Machine, Falcon, Heimdall, Nick Fury, Black Panther, Carl Mordo,Hogun, Wong, Gabe Jones, Jim Morita. DC - Perry White, Amanda Waller (again I say, a positive role?), Katana, El Diablo, Deadshot. Can't comment on the Wonder Woman number. The question of racial divesity in DC in general has been something DC-Fan has ignored on numerous occasions, when being asked about it. He has only cared about divesrity since the arrival of Wander Woman, and has only just touched upon racial diversity since he has concluded he can count Deadshot as a lead. Above all though, I am just questioning DC-Fans constant assertion, a blind belief that DC only films are noteworthy and no Marvel films are. Yes there are Marvel fans that do likewise, but none more constantly, none who think their opinion is so important they have to do multiple posts on the same matter, and none who ignore direct questioning of their statements so often.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 6, 2017 13:26:51 GMT
Most of the female roles in Marvel films are bigger than the examples of non-caucasian roles in DC films you provided. You go on and on about the lack of diversity in Marvel Films but for you it seems your idea of diversity is more or bigger female roles. Despite the fact that MCU has given way more strong, female characters than DCEU has.But diversity isn't just about sex of characters. When is the first non-Caucasian led DCEU film going to be announced? DC has notoriously always been behind Marvel, whether on screen or comics when dealing with non-white characters. Even the first film produced by Marvel starred a black character - Blade. So when you harp on about diversity, stop being so narrow minded in it's definition. I cannot follow what you are saying, at least based on the facts.
- DCEU has 4 movies to date, right? MCU has 15, if I count correctly.
- One of the 4 DCEU movies has a female lead (WW). MCU with 15 movies has none, right..? One DCEU film even has a female main antagonist/villain. MCU has none, right...?
- One of the 4 DCEU movies already has a non white lead (if you count W Smith as that, which you should) - [DC even has a non white female superhero movie, but I digress]. MCU has none, right...? (please dont even try to argue that Antman or Ironman actors are somehow not white guys...)
I am not very good with the laws of averages, but it seems that in this diversity equasion DCEU is clearly ahead of MCU.
Great post! sostie (an MCU fan who's trying to make up BS just like the MCU fan who made up the BS rumor a couple of months ago that the Wonder Woman movie was a "complete mess") just got owned!
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jun 6, 2017 13:33:07 GMT
1. MCU's overuse of humor makes MCU movies crappy.MCU's overuse of humor reduces the impact of scenes. It's OK to have humor in a superhero movie, but there's a proper time and place for it and after 15 movies MCU still hasn't found the proper time and place. In The Avengers, aliens are invading Manhattan and all the Avengers are doing is standing around cracking 1-liners. In Age of Ultron, Ultron is killing people and all the Avengers are doing is standing around cracking 1-liners. In Wonder Woman, Patty Jenkins demonstrated the correct way to use humor in a superhero movie. Sure, Sameer, Charlie, and the Chief are constantly cracking jokes, but not when they were charging across No Man's Land with Diana and then helping Diana liberate the town from the German soldiers. Diana had plenty of light-hearted banter with Steve and even with Charlie (when she said if Charlie leaves, who will sing for us), but when Diana was traveling to the battlefront and saw the horrors of the war (e.g. the injured and wounded (some with amputated limbs) and the town burned down and reduced to rubble and women and children lying dead from the poisonous gas), there was no banter or jokes or 1-liners. If it were a MCU movie, MCU characters would be cracking jokes and 1-liners during those scenes of horror, reducing the impact of those scenes. Adults who are comfortable with their adulthood enjoy humor. Why waste good characters? Stark's parents are as dead as the Waynes. Steve Rogers's patents are dead. Peggy Carter is dead. Jarvis is dead. Why do DC fans worship death so? Why do they like losing people? Gandolph should have stayed dead. Maybe this is the detachment I have with DC heroes. I cared about the new characters added to PotC5. I didn't want them to die. I didn't feel anything for Steve Trevor's motley crew of Howling Commandos. I didn't cheer at their successes as I did Steve Rogers' Commandos. I know Cap is found & revived, yet that scene between Peggy & Steve is heartbreaking. His sacrifice noble. what the hell was that look on Trevor's face? You don't want to know what I thought he was doing. Damn. The cop ordering his people to do what Cap ordered him to do? The Montage of grateful citizens at the end of Avengers? Most people are going to try to protect their loved ones like staying with their loved ones when they should evacuate. What do you think the newsreel footage of the Howling Commandos shown to the Americans in theaters was meant to do? The bonds Steve sold on that tour raising money for the war effort. I grew up hearing about that stuff. WWII was my parents' childhood. I heard abut the effect the sacrifices people made-food rationed, etc. Batman is a vigilante working outside the law. Trevor is going to go on his mission even when he is ordered to let the place he plans to attack alone. Batman Batman. Like Supes not catching the bomb that blew up all those people at the hearing? The World's Greatest Detective falling for Luthor's tricks? You mean like Bruce Wayne assembling his team? If Waller wasn't forcing June Moon AGAINST HER WILL to do her bidding, that city wouldn't have been turned into a hellscape, killing thousands. ... Incredible Hulk...because people in our military don't make mistakes & kill innocent villagers in Vietnam. War is hell, isn't it? Sad little DC fan. Can't comprehend Steve Rogers was thinking outside the box. The trainers were thinking physical feat while Steve, looking at the problem & the stated goal, looked at it from all sides & found the best solution. I need to get dressed & go to work now so enough fun for now. Maybe I'll be back in 9 hours.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 6, 2017 13:43:11 GMT
No, they were the most famous actors in an ensemble piece. It wasn't Deadshot The Movie or Harley Quinn The Movie. Therr roles are as big as Black Widows or Falcon's in some of the MCU films. No, you've just proven how dumb you MCU fans are. The Fast and the Furious isn't called "Dominic Toretto The Movie" or "Brian O'Connor The Movie". It's an ensemlbe movie, but clearly Vin Diesel and Paul Walker were the 2 leads characters in that movie. And clearly Deadshot and Harley Quinn were the 2 lead characters in Suicide Squad. And both their roles were much bigger than Black Widow's and Falcon's roles in any MCU films. Black Widow and Falcon have been nothing more than supporting characters in any MCU film. As for Harley Quinn - yeah there is a female role, one which in both the film and it's promotion, is sold as a sex object pandering to teen fanboy wank fantasies - there's a strong female role model for you, a psycho criminal in skimpy clothes who is supplicant to, and fawns over her boyfriend. And MCU promotes Captain Marvel not by showing her as a strong woman who can stand up for herself and kick some ass but by showing a teaser of her in a bra and panties. Supergirl, Elektra and Catwoman - such a high standard to meet. And yet, that's still better than what MCU has made (which is nothing) when it comes to female-led superhero movies. Black Adam isn't actually black. Yes they cast a non-caucasian in Dwayne Johnson, but that has nothing to do with diversity I knew MCU fans MCU fans are dumb, but you may be the dumbest MCU fan of all. Dwayne Johnson is black. His father is Rocky Johnson.actors playing characters a different race to the comic book counterpart, members of teams counting as leads...how about Guardians Of The Galaxy? A green woman played by woman of Dominican/Puerto Rica descent, a Blue man played by a man of Greek/Filipino decent and a squirrel and a tree. That's diversity for you. The lead character in GotG is Starlord - a Caucasian male. The "green" woman, Domincan/Puerto Rican woman, "Blue" man of Greek/Filipino descent, squirrel, and tree are supporting characters. So once again, you've proven my point that MCU only allows Caucasian males to play lead roles in their movies and all others only get supporting roles in their movies or lead roles on TV shows, where they have less of an opportunity to instantly become big stars the way that Gal Gadot (who was mostly unknown to the general public a couple years ago) has suddenly become a big star by having the lead role in Wonder Woman.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 6, 2017 14:06:22 GMT
Black Widow, Frigga, Sif, Peggy Carter, Maria Hill, Sharon Carter, Scarlet Witch, Gamora, Nebula, plus the "non-hero" roles Pepper Potts, Betty Ross, Hope van Dyne, Christine Palmer None of which have been lead characters in MCU movies. You MCU fans are so dumb!
Having a supporting role in a movie or a lead role in a TV show isn't as prestigious as having a lead role in a movie. Chris Pratt, Chris Evans, and Chris Hemsworth were all relatively unknown before they had the lead roles in GotG, CA:TFA, and Thor. Those lead roles have made them big stars.
Meanwhile, Hayley Atwell had a supporting role in CA:TFA and a lead role in Agent Carter for 2 seasons and Krysten Ritter had a lead role in Jessica Jones. But Gal Gadot (who has relatively unknown to the general public a couple years ago) is now a bigger star than both Hayley Atwell and Krysten Ritter, all because Gal Gadot has the lead role in Wonder Woman.
Like I said in a previous post, it's not diversity to just put a few female characters in supporting roles in movies or lead roles in TV shows just to say that they met a quota. If the NBA or NFL was accused of not hiring more women for executive positions, they can't defend themsleves by just saying "Well, we've just hired more women secretaries so we're not really against opportunities for women."
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 6, 2017 14:08:21 GMT
No, they were the most famous actors in an ensemble piece. It wasn't Deadshot The Movie or Harley Quinn The Movie. Therr roles are as big as Black Widows or Falcon's in some of the MCU films. No, you've just proven how dumb you MCU fans are. The Fast and the Furious isn't called "Dominic Toretto The Movie" or "Brian O'Connor The Movie". It's an ensemlbe movie, but clearly Vin Diesel and Paul Walker were the 2 leads characters in that movie.
And clearly Deadshot and Harley Quinn were the 2 lead characters in Suicide Squad. And both their roles were much bigger than Black Widow's and Falcon's roles in any MCU films. Black Widow and Falcon have been nothing more than supporting characters in any MCU film.As for Harley Quinn - yeah there is a female role, one which in both the film and it's promotion, is sold as a sex object pandering to teen fanboy wank fantasies - there's a strong female role model for you, a psycho criminal in skimpy clothes who is supplicant to, and fawns over her boyfriend. And MCU promotes Captain Marvel not by showing her as a strong woman who can stand up for herself and kick some ass but by showing a teaser of her in a bra and panties. Why would the first Fast & Furious film be called "Dominic Toretto The Movie" - he was not an established fictional character. Whereas Deadshot & Harley Quinn were within and established fictional team. If Black Widow is such a minor character why did she get the third most screentime in The Avengers..more than Thor and Banner/Hulk It's the height of irony that you call me dumb, when, despite being debunked numerous times as a fake trailer, and even being titled a "fake trailer" you think that terribly put together snippet on YouTube is real. You only have to look at the actual concept photos Marvel released to see it bears no relation to what is in that "trailer". Your counter is lame, especially considering that there are more shots of Harley's ass than there are of some of the other SS members
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 6, 2017 14:27:08 GMT
The cop ordering his people to do what Cap ordered him to do? That traffic cop was paid to direct people where to go in case of an emergency. He just did what he got paid to do and wasn't risking his life. How was that heroic? Perry White and Steve Lombard weren't paid to try to free Jenny from the rubble while the path of destruction was heading towards them. They did that (and risked their lives doing that) because they were inspired by the heroics that Superman had done. Steve Trevor told Sameer, Charlie, and the Chief that he had no more money to pay them and they were free to leave, but they continued with the mission knowing they weren't getting paid and they risked their lives for the mission because they were inspired by the heroics of Diana. And Steve Trevor made the ultimate sacrifice to destroy the poisonous gas because he was inspired by the heroics of Diana. The Montage of grateful citizens at the end of Avengers? And how is that being heroic? Most people are going to try to protect their loved ones like staying with their loved ones when they should evacuate. Most people do that for their family but not for their co-workers. Jenny was just their co-worker and not their family. Most people would've evacuated. But Perry White and Steve Lombard both stayed and tried to free Jenny from the rubble when the path of destruction was heading towards them because they were inspired by the heroics that Superman had done. What do you think the newsreel footage of the Howling Commandos shown to the Americans in theaters was meant to do? The bonds Steve sold on that tour raising money for the war effort. Ah yes, the good old excuse "I contributed to the war effort by donating money". You MCU fans must love the good old days when the rich didn't have go fight in wars and could pay someone to go take their place in battle. I grew up hearing about that stuff. WWII was my parents' childhood. I heard abut the effect the sacrifices people made-food rationed, etc. I'm not referring to what real people did i eal life. I'm referring to MCU movies, where tehre isn't a single example of ordinary people in the movie being inspired to do something heroic in the movie. Batman works with the consent and support of the GCPD. That's why the GCPD has a Batsignal on top of police headquarters. So they can call Batman for assistance. When they flash the Batsignal in the sky, that's the GCPD requesting assistance from Batman. Can't comprehend Steve Rogers was thinking outside the box. I see that you're too dumb to understand the point. The point isn't Steve Rogers thinking outside the box and being able to get the flag down. The poit is that MCU intentionally made all the other soldiers look so incompetent because none of them could think outside the box and get the flag down. That's MCU's mandate from MCU dictator Kevin Feige. US soldiers must not look heroic and must look corrupt or incompetent so that MCU heroes can look more heroic.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 6, 2017 14:29:15 GMT
Black Widow, Frigga, Sif, Peggy Carter, Maria Hill, Sharon Carter, Scarlet Witch, Gamora, Nebula, plus the "non-hero" roles Pepper Potts, Betty Ross, Hope van Dyne, Christine Palmer None of which have been lead characters in MCU movies. You MCU fans are so dumb!
Having a supporting role in a movie or a lead role in a TV show isn't as prestigious as having a lead role in a movie. Chris Pratt, Chris Evans, and Chris Hemsworth were all relatively unknown before they had the lead roles in GotG, CA:TFA, and Thor. Those lead roles have made them big stars.
Meanwhile, Hayley Atwell had a supporting role in CA:TFA and a lead role in Agent Carter for 2 seasons and Krysten Ritter had a lead role in Jessica Jones. But Gal Gadot (who has relatively unknown to the general public a couple years ago) is now a bigger star than both Hayley Atwell and Krysten Ritter, all because Gal Gadot has the lead role in Wonder Woman.
Like I said in a previous post, it's not diversity to just put a few female characters in supporting roles in movies or lead roles in TV shows just to say that they met a quota. If the NBA or NFL was accused of not hiring more women for executive positions, they can't defend themsleves by just saying "Well, we've just hired more women secretaries so we're not really against opportunities for women."
Oh you poor deluded little man. Claiming diversity in a film is useless if the roles are not positive. Now the two DCEU examples you go on about are Wonder Woman (great) but also Harley Quinn - a supplicant, sex object...how positive. If you think the MCU examples I gave are not as important then neither is every other female character in DCEU (which lets face isn't that many). No most of Marvel's female characters have not had screentime in a single film as much as those two, but they have all been positive roles, and many are far from insignificant. It is pointless claiming DC is more diverse than MCU when on the one hand you use a positive character like Wonder Woman as an example and on the other a character like Harley Quinn. It the representation over all the films - not just the one that stands when comparing the universes, and I'm afraid one outstanding female role and a psycho slut is a poor comparison to a procession of strong female characters in MCU.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jun 6, 2017 14:29:59 GMT
This is the guy who thinks Superman toying with the US Military and then destroying their property while mocking them means he "cooperates" with them.
And no, the Bat-Signal is not a sign that Batman has proper support from the Police. It shows how incompetent the GCPD are, how they're really bad cops.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 6, 2017 14:40:44 GMT
Black Adam isn't actually black. Yes they cast a non-caucasian in Dwayne Johnson, but that has nothing to do with diversity I knew MCU fans MCU fans are dumb, but you may be the dumbest MCU fan of all. Dwayne Johnson is black. His father is Rocky Johnson.Oh you poor deluded skim reading fool. I didn't say Dwayne Johnson wasn't black, I said Black Adam isn't black. Read very carefully what you quoted me. See that bit where I describe Dwayne Johnson as non-caucasian? feel a bit stupid now? (and why should I know who Rocky Johnson is?)
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 6, 2017 15:37:25 GMT
1. MCU's overuse of humor makes MCU movies crappy.MCU's overuse of humor reduces the impact of scenes. It's OK to have humor in a superhero movie, but there's a proper time and place for it and after 15 movies MCU still hasn't found the proper time and place. In The Avengers, aliens are invading Manhattan and all the Avengers are doing is standing around cracking 1-liners. In Age of Ultron, Ultron is killing people and all the Avengers are doing is standing around cracking 1-liners. In Wonder Woman, Patty Jenkins demonstrated the correct way to use humor in a superhero movie. Sure, Sameer, Charlie, and the Chief are constantly cracking jokes, but not when they were charging across No Man's Land with Diana and then helping Diana liberate the town from the German soldiers. Diana had plenty of light-hearted banter with Steve and even with Charlie (when she said if Charlie leaves, who will sing for us), but when Diana was traveling to the battlefront and saw the horrors of the war (e.g. the injured and wounded (some with amputated limbs) and the town burned down and reduced to rubble and women and children lying dead from the poisonous gas), there was no banter or jokes or 1-liners. If it were a MCU movie, MCU characters would be cracking jokes and 1-liners during those scenes of horror, reducing the impact of those scenes. 2. MCU movies have low stakes because MCU characters can't "die".In addition to overuse of humor reducing the impact of scenes, MCU movies have low stakes because MCU characters can't "die". Bucky dies, only to be resurrected later. Agent Coulson dies, only to be resurrected later. Nick Fury apparently dies, but then they said he didn't really die. By contrast, Thomas and Martha Wayne, General Antiope, and Captain Steve Trevor all die and none of them are going to be resurrected. When characters that die are routinely resurrected over and over again, deaths become meaningless because you expect that any character that dies can and will be resurrected later on so the stakes are low because characters can't die. It's only when characters die and aren't routinely resurrected (e.g. Thomas and Martha Wayne, General Antiope, and Captain Steve Trevor ) that the stakes become much higher because the characters might really be gone for good. 3. MCU heroes don't inspire ordinary people to be heroic.Remember the scene in Superman II when Ursa and Non picked up a bus full of passengers and threw the bus at Superman? Superman tried to stop the bus but the momentum of the bus pushed Superman backwards and pinned Superman against a truck. The crowd on the street watching the battle thought that Ursa and Non had killed Superman so they decided to go after Zod, Ursa, and Non. Even though they didn't have any superpowers, the crowd was willing to risk their lives to go after Zod, Ursa, and Non because they were inspired by the heroics that Superman had done for years. The DCEU superheroes also inspire ordinary people to be heroic. In MoS, Perry White and Steve Lombard are on the street trying to get away from the path of destruction caused by the Black Zero when a building collapses and Jenny is trapped underneath the rubble. Instead of running away, Perry and Steve risk their lives attempting to move the rubble and free Jenny while the path of destruction approaches them. Perry and Steve are just ordinary people who were inspired to be heroic because of Superman. In Wonder Woman, when Diana climbs up out of the trench and charges across No Man's Land and draws fire from the German soldiers, that inspires Steve Trevor, Sameer, Charlie, and the Chief to also charge across No Man's Land and help Diana liberate the village from the German soldiers. Then when Steve tells Sameer, Charlie, and the Chief that he has no more money to pay them and they're free to leave, they all decide to stay and continue with the mission because they were inspired by the heroics of Diana in liberating the village from the German soldiers. And of course, Steve Trevor makes the ultimate sacrifice to destroy the poisonous gas because he was inspired by the heroics of Diana. We never see any MCU heroes inspiring ordinary people to be heroic. 4. MCU heroes don't respect the authority of the people.Superman is the most powerful person on the planet. But with all his superpowers, Superman still respects the authority of the people and doesn't want to be a tyrant or ruler over the people. In MoS, Superman willingly surrenders himself to the US military because he respects the authority of the people. And in BvS, Superman appears before a Congressional committee when requested even though they had no power to force him to appear because he respects the authority of the people. By contrast, the Avengers don't respect the authority of the people and believe that their powers allow them to be tyrants who can do whatever they want whenever they want. In Iron Man 2, Tony Stark is requested in a Congressional committee to turn over the Iron Man suit to the US government in the interests of national security. That was a perfectly valid and reasonable request given the fact that previously weapons of mass destruction built by Stark Industries had fallen into the hands of terrorists (meaning that Stark clearly has a security problem and is unable to keep his weapons of mass destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists) and given the fact that the Iron Man suit had more destructive capability than the 2 atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and thus the US government was concerned about the possibility that the Iron Man suit could fall into the hands of terrorists (especially after previous weapons of mass destruction built by Stark Industries had fallen into the hands of terrorists). But Stark refused that perfectly valid and reasonable request by the US government. In The Winter Soldier, Black Widow basically tells a Congressional committee that they can't arrest her because she's an Avenger and the Avengers are more powerful than Congress so the Avengers can do whatever they want whenever they want and can't be arrested for anything. In Age of Ultron, Tony Stark unilaterally decides to build Ultron without discussion with or authorization from any government leaders. And after Iron Man and Hulk destroy a city in Africa, instead of turning themselves into the authorities to answer for the destruction that they caused, they flee from the city like fugitives and hide out at Hawkeye's house like common criminals. And of course in Civil War, Captain America gave a bullshit argument against the Sokovia Accords claiming that "The safest hands are our own", which completely ignored the fact that Scarlett Witch had just set off a bomb that blew out the side of a building and killed many people who wouldn't have been killed if not for the Avengers, and therefore the safest hands aren't their own because they weren't able to police themselves and clearly need some kind of oversight. The real reason that Captain America didn't want UN oversight of the Avengers was simply because he didn't respect the authority of the people and didn't think that the Avengers (who are more powerful than the people) should have to answer to the people (or the elected representatives of the people). Instead, Captain America wanted to be a tyrant who unilaterally decided what's best for the people (just like Hitler and Stalin unilaterally decided what was best for their people). 5. MCU portrays US soldiers as corrupt and/or incompetent in order to make MCU heroes look more heroic.In addition to MCU heroes not respecting the authority of the people, MCU portrays US soldiers as corrupt and/or incompetent. In The Incredible Hulk, General Ross and his men are portrayed as corrupt soldiers who want to use the Hulk as a weapon. In The First Avenger, the soldiers are so incompetent that none of them could get the flag down from the flagpole but Steve Rogers can do it. And in The Avengers, the military is so incompetent that it takes them more than 1 hour to scramble fighter jets to fly over New York City, the most populous city in the country and the site of previous terrorist attacks. That's all done for the sole purpose of making Steve Rogers (in The First Avenger) and the Avengers in The Avengers) look more heroic. By contrast, DCEU portrays US soldiers as brave. In MoS, the soldiers fight bravely against Zod and his army even though the soldiers are no match for the superpowered Kryptonians. Colonel Hardy makes the ultimate sacrifice to help destroy the Black Zero. And in Wonder Woman, Captain Steve Trevor makes the ultimate sacrifice to destroy the poisonous gas. We've never seen any such heroics from US soldiers in MCU movies because MCU's philosophy is that US soldiers must not look heroic so that the Avengers can look more heroic. 6. MCU villains present little or no challenge.A hero isn't great unless the hero has a formidable villain who challenges the hero and pushes the hero to the limit. Without Darth Vader, Luke Skywalker is just a farmboy and not a Jedi Knight who destroys the Death Star and helps defeat the Galactic Empire. In MoS, Superman battles a Kryptonian army that is as powerful as he is. In BvS, the Trinity battle Doomsday, who gets hit with a nuclear missile and still can't be stopped. In Wonder Woman, Wonder Woman battles an Olympian god who is as powerful as she is. In The Avengers, the Avengers battle a bunch of aliens who have no superpowers and who get defeated by just a single nuclear missile launched by the military. In GotG, the main villain (Ronan the Big Bad Destroyer of Planets) is defeated by something as silly as a Dance-Off. MCU villains present little or no challenge and it doesn't take much effort to defeat them. 7. MCU movies only have Caucasian males as lead characters.Spider-Man: Homecoming and Thor: Ragnarok will be MCU's 16th and 17th movies respectively. The lead character in all 17 MCU movies has been or will be a Caucasian male. MCU is in its 9th year and still hasn't made a female-led superhero movie while the DCEU is only in its 4th year and has already made the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. MCU only allows female characters to have supporting roles in movies or lead roles on TV shows, but doesn't allow female characters to have lead roles in movies, where they can instantly become big stars. Hayley Atwell has had a supporting role in The First Avenger and a lead role on Agent Carter for 2 seasons. But Gal Gadot (who was unknown by most of the general public just a couple years ago) is now more well-known by the general public than Hayley Atwell, all because Gal Gadot had the lead role in the Wonder Woman. With a Batgirl and Gotham City Sirens movies as well as a sequel to Wonder Woman coming in the near future, the DCEU has shown that they're willing to have female characters in lead roles and give them an opportunity to instantly become big stars. Joss Whedon plans to cast a relatively unknown actress as Batgirl so there's currently a relatively unknown actress out there who will have an opportunity to instantly become a big star like Gal Gadot has done. But in MCU, it's only Caucasian males (e.g. Chris Pratt, Chris Evans, and Chris Hemsworth) who go from being relative unknowns to recognizable stars by the general public due to having lead roles in MCU movies. 8. MCU is afraid to embrace mythology.As a child, I loved watching movies about Greek mythology, like Jason and the Argonauts and Clash of the Titans (1981 version starring Harry Hamlin). So I'm glad that the DCEU embraces mythology in their movies. Zeus is the Creator of Mankind. Zeus also created the Amazons to save Mankind from Ares, and Diana is the daughter of Zeus. And in Justice League, we're going to find out about an ancient war in which the mythical Amazons and the mythical Atlanteans joined forces with normal humans to battle the forces of Darkseid. By contrast, MCU is afraid to embrace mythology in their movies. MCU Thor isn't a god but just an advanced alien from another dimension. 9. MCU movies are full of bad, illogical writing.In The Avengers, the Chitauri had flying segways while Black Widow, Captain America, and Hawkeye were grounded and couldn't fly. So the Chitauri had a huge tactical advantage because they could just stay high in the air above the buildings, where they would not only have a clear unobstructed view of everything on the ground but also have a clear shot at civilians below and there was nothing that Black Widow, Captain America, or Hawkeye could do about it. But instead of staying high in the air above the buildings, the Chitauri fly below the height of the buildings, not only obstructing their view but also allowing Black Widow to jump onto 1 of their flying segways and hijack it. That was bad, illogical writing. But they included that bad, illogical writing only because they needed to give Black Widow something more to do during the battle than just stand there and crack 1-liners. Moreover, they said that the Chitauri didn't cause much damage because the Chitauri stayed within a 5-city-block area. That's bullshit! The Chitauri had flying segways while Black Widow, Captain America, and Hawkeye were grounded and couldn't fly. Thor was busy fighting Loki. So that left only Hulk (who couldn't fly) and Iron Man against all those Chitauri. There's no way that 2 Avengers (1 of whom can't even fly) could keep hundreds of flying Chitauri inside a 5-city-block area. The Chitauri have probably invaded other planets before so they must be an experienced invasion force. The last thing that an experienced invasion force (especially an invasion force that outnumbered their opponent by a lot) would do is bunch all of their invaders together into 1 small area, where the opponent can just concentrate their entire attack on that 1 small area. An experienced invasion force would spread out so that their opponent couldn't concentrate on 1 small area only. Again, that was bad, illogical writing. And the scene of Nick Fury arguing with the Council over the use of nuclear weapons was illogical. Only the POTUS can authorize the use of nuclear weapons so it made no sense at all for Nick Fury and the Council to argue over something that neither had the authority to make the final decision on. In Age of Ultron, Iron Man and Captain America fight because Steve somehow knew that Bucky murdered Tony's parents (even though Steve was frozen in ice when the murders occurred) and didn't tell Tony, but how does Tony (who somehow knew that a random high school kid in a city of 8 million people was the Amazing Spider-Kid) not know that his parents were murdered when the coroner's report would've noted that Maria Stark had palm prints around her neck and a crushed larynx and the death certificate would've listed Maria Stark's cause of death as "asphyxiation due to strangulation"? How the hell does dumb-ass Tony Stark think that "asphyxiation due to strangulation" means accidental death in a road accident and not murder? Again, that was bad, illogical writing. Also, Iron Man knew that Captain America and Bucky were going to be at the airport to hijack the quinjet. Yet, Iron Man (who supposedly always has a plan) had no plan to set up a trap for them and never thought of disabling the quinjet by removing the engine or draining the fuel tank so they couldn't hijack the quinjet. And Scott Lang said in Ant-Man that he became Ant-Man so that his young daughter could be proud of her ex-con dad. But then in Civil War, he goes and fights on the side of a wanted terrorist and murderer. Way to make the daughter proud - by aiding and abetting a wanted terrorist and murderer to escape from the authorities! Total DC bias, so its kinda pointless to argue against you, but whatever, I'll give it a shot. In regard to the humor, you over-exaggerate the humor in Marvel films. Yes they have more than DC films, but your claim that they stand around and do nothing while cracking one liners is completely false. Then again, you're a complete DC-shill who's totally biased but that's to be expected from a DC-fanboy but whatever. But watch any of the final battle in the first Avengers or Age of Ultron, yes, while they're making occasional jokes, they're not overdoing it and are actually taking action of a "saving" people, while also communicating with each other. It's called levity as well. Plus, it was better than how the Doomsday fight in BvS played out as well. Batman and Wonder Woman and Superman looked so stiff and bored when they're not at least communicating with each other. But again, you're a DC fanboy, so I don't expect you to believe anything I say. Regarding characters dying, plenty of characters die in the Marvel film, even right in the first Iron Man film with Yinsen. Starks parents, Black Panther's father, Quicksilver, just to name a few. Even Yondu. I was expecting Marvel to usually go with a more minor character, but they killed Yondu. I was actually genuinely upset over that because I would have loved to see him in Infinity War. Meanwhile, DC decides to kill Superman his second film, but we all know he's not dead, don't we!?!? In regard to what you said about the heroes inspiring other people, you brought up the original Superman films, so I guess your thread isn't limited to only the DCEU or the MCU, but all DC and Marvel films. Well, watch any of the Toby's Spider-Man films and there's always a part when Spidey is struggling and the people of New York step up to help. But even in the first Avengers film, Rogers giving orders to the police to help direct civilians away from the destruction. But it's not exactly a big deal that they're inspiring people, at least they're helping to keep them safe, especially in Age of Ultron. But the scene you talked about in Man of Steel. I'm not a big hater that film. I actually liked it. I didn't agree with all the decisions made, but I went with it, and do think it's better than some MCU films. But the scene with Perry and Lombardi and Jenny was one of the biggest contrivance of the film. Why? Because Superman has no idea that the three are about to be killed. So it feels so disconnected. Just like with the Amazing Spiderman 2 with the Electro fight, Spider-man has no idea that the he caused two planes to almost crash and fall out of the sky, so he could have took all the time he want to stop him and wouldn't realize that two planes full of people are going to die. Just like with Man of Steel, Superman has no idea Perry and Steve and Lombardi were going to die. They way he stood under the World Engine gaining strength, if he stood there for just a few more minutes, they would have been dead. I understand what you meant by inspiring others, but the whole scene felt like a big contrivance just to give Perry something to do because he's played by Laurence Fishburne. The whole thing regarding authority. For starters, that's just part of Tony Stark's character. It's what makes him, but doesn't necessarily make him a bad guy or anything. But even in Civil War, he's all for the accords. But it's just part of the comic story line as well, you can't really argue about them disrespecting authority when its from the comics how they act. But whatever, I'd expect that from a DC fanboy. And Scarlet Witch didn't intentionally destroy the building and kill those people. And even then, that's something Marvel has. Superheros with flaws and makes mistakes like that. It builds characters. Even Stark building Ultron, yeah, I'd call that a flaw because's overly confident in himself. And just because Roger thinks the best hands is their own, doesn't make him a dictator or tyrant. You kinda miss the entire point of Roger's character if you don't understand why he acts like he does. And what Black Widow said to Congress, what she meant by that is that the world obviously will need the Avengers and they realize that but just aren't willing to admit it. In regard to portraying soldiers as "incompetent". No soldier or any other figure of authority was necessarily portrayed as incompetent. In regards to Ross in the Incredible Hulk, you clearly don't understand the character, but that's what Ross's character has always been like. In the Incredible Hulk was pre-Avengers days, so yeah, they had every reason to try and capture him. Doesn't mean they're corrupt or anything. And the way the portrayed soldiers in the Avengers is no different than than Man of Steel in a big invasion. The invaders are both aliens so obviously the soldiers aren't going to win the battle. That's the whole point of superhero films, so it elevates the hero or heroes. In regards to the villains, DC isn't exactly on a roll either. Zod and the other Kryptonians have only really been the real challenge for Superman. And I liked that. And yeah, I'll admit Marvel isn't the greatest with villains, but in BvS, Doomsday was really just Zod again. Wasn't really actually Doomsday. But Wonder Woman seemed to have no problem kicking his ass, so he was hardly a challenge. Lex Luthor, I guess it comes down to personal opinion of how he was portrayed, but I thought he was just an embarrassment in the film and one of the worst casting decisions and terrible script writing for him, but he was hardly a formidable villain and even made Batman looked dumb really. Batman, the world's greatest detective, couldn't even figure out Lex Luthor was manipulating everything. And Ares was hardly a developed villain. He was nothing more than a throw-away villain for an origin film. Maybe it all comes down to a matter of opinion, but yeah, it was kinda predictable with him and everything. And I would really like to hear you try to defend the Enchantress from Suicide Squad. Tell me she's a great villain and the whole battle wasn't just another generic beam in the sky, this time, with garbage. In regard to having male Caucasian lead, this really has no bearing on whether the MCU or DCEU is better. Just a matter of opinion and you using it as an excuse to make DC look better because they had a female-lead film. Great, I think that's awesome. Don't know why you have to make it out like every Marvel fan hates Wonder Woman or something just because it's DC. I loved the film and thought it was better than BvS and Man of Steel and definitely Suicide Squad and even some Marvel films. But we'll be getting Captain Marvel anyways. Agent Carter and Black Widow and whatnot, they're just "supporting characters". Its kinda hard to give a supporting character their own movie, but they still serve their part, and still badass in their own right and saved the hero plenty of times in a situation in their respective films. In regard to Marvel being afraid embracing their mythology, I'm afraid you got that backwards. Man of Steel, as much as I liked it, it was still a Superman film afraid to be a superman film. It went for the dark and grit, was afraid to show Superman in a bright blue suit. It was even worst in BvS, afraid to embrace Superman as a character and kinda made him a silent psychopath. Yeah, the Thor film may have made Thor an intergalactic alien/being from another dimension, but they still embrace all the aspects of the character's mythos, including the Norse mythos behind the characters. Man of Steel is even too embarrassed and afraid to put the red underwear on Superman. In regards to the writing, thats more of matter of opinion. Yeah, I'll admit Black Widow is a little OPed sometimes, but it wasn't as embarrassing as Batman just standing and watching Superman and Wonder Woman fight Doomsday while he has no idea what to do. If you ever watch the Justice League cartoon, you'd see that Batman is always doing something despite just being a man, even against an intergalactic being. He's never just standing around like a dunce. This is kinda what Black Widow is like in the Avengers despite she just being human. Now, again, whether you like that decision with her character is just a matte of opinion. In regard to the Chitauri's actions and tactical advantages, why didn't Zod just immediately start up the World Engine after capturing Superman. And why is Lois Lane always in danger? Like every other scene, Superman always has to save her. I can get over the fact Zod wanted her to come up in the ship with Superman, but why was she on the plane in the final battle. She couldn't just give all the information to Col. Hardy and Hamilton to deal with Superman's pod. She was only on the plane so she could be a damsel in distress and Superman could save her. Then, you complain about humor, well, after the World Engine just destroyed half a city and killed millions probably, what do Superman and Lois do; they kiss. Here's the exact dialogue. Lois: "You know, they say it's all downhill after the first kiss. " Superman: "I'm pretty sure that only counts when you're kissing a human. "Really? Thousands dead, and the one thing Lois is thinking is their relationship!?! I'm surprise they didn't fuck on top of pile of crispy corpses. Seriously, the weakest aspect of the film was definitely the romance. Amy Adams and Henry Cavill had no chemistry with each other. Dude, Thor only fought Loki for a couple minutes then was immediately back to helping securing and keeping the Chitauri contained. And combined with him and Iron Man and Hulk, it's pretty believable they were able to maintain some kind of containment. I'm sure it wasn't perfect or anything, but now you're just nitpicking because you're a DC fanboy. Maybe you forgot, but this is a superhero universe. The World's Security Council is meant to be like a NATO/UN kind of thing regarding superpowered beings and whatnot, along with SHIELD. So I'm sure they have some provisional authority over all nations. Again, you're nitpicking really. Watch Winter Soldier again, Black Widow gives Roger a file on Bucky as the Winter Soldier. I'm pretty sure it listed the number of murders and assassinations the Bucky committed, including Tony's parents. And Tony probably didn't even read the autopsy report or anything and was just told where it happened. Not that hard to understand. In regard to the Airport fight, Tony probably expected to easily stop Roger and didn't really plan on him making it pass him. Just part of Tony's overconfidence. But in the end, kinda a nitpick as well. Totally subjective. And the last part regarding Antman, really has no bearing. Just another minor nitpick. Plus, as he already mentioned when Roger said if he were to help, he'd be a wanted man, Lang points out he is already a criminal, so he knew what he was getting into. But he had already been filled in with the situation and just chose the side he thought was right. Just part of the storyline. So, I just debunked everyone of your points. You're welcomed to try and counter any of them, but be sure to provide actual evidence to back up your points like I did rather than just saying I'm wrong for the sake of being wrong and being a Marvel fanboy.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jun 6, 2017 15:55:16 GMT
That was a lovely effort, but it won't get through to him.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Jun 6, 2017 19:18:42 GMT
1. Ok
2. That's fine
3. TLDR
4. Potatoes
5. *chewing* hey, want some gum?
6. Are you sure you don't want some? I mean....I have plenty..................alright cool.
7. I should probably get some more Marvel shirts, but I can't find any good ones, except the Shwarma one.....I have one too many DC shirts.
8. For whatever reason I think Pandas and Penguins are the cutest animals.
9. I want to buy a moog, but they're so expensive.......and I should probably learn piano first.
10. EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Jun 6, 2017 20:49:06 GMT
Wait....
All this time I haven't noticed...
DC Fan doesn't mean DC Comics...
It means Dallas Cowboys.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jun 7, 2017 3:26:32 GMT
The cop ordering his people to do what Cap ordered him to do? That traffic cop was paid to direct people where to go in case of an emergency. He just did what he got paid to do and wasn't risking his life. How was that heroic? Perry White and Steve Lombard weren't paid to try to free Jenny from the rubble while the path of destruction was heading towards them. They did that (and risked their lives doing that) because they were inspired by the heroics that Superman had done. Steve Trevor told Sameer, Charlie, and the Chief that he had no more money to pay them and they were free to leave, but they continued with the mission knowing they weren't getting paid and they risked their lives for the mission because they were inspired by the heroics of Diana. And Steve Trevor made the ultimate sacrifice to destroy the poisonous gas because he was inspired by the heroics of Diana. The Montage of grateful citizens at the end of Avengers? And how is that being heroic? Most people are going to try to protect their loved ones like staying with their loved ones when they should evacuate. Most people do that for their family but not for their co-workers. Jenny was just their co-worker and not their family. Most people would've evacuated. But Perry White and Steve Lombard both stayed and tried to free Jenny from the rubble when the path of destruction was heading towards them because they were inspired by the heroics that Superman had done. What do you think the newsreel footage of the Howling Commandos shown to the Americans in theaters was meant to do? The bonds Steve sold on that tour raising money for the war effort. Ah yes, the good old excuse "I contributed to the war effort by donating money". You MCU fans must love the good old days when the rich didn't have go fight in wars and could pay someone to go take their place in battle. I grew up hearing about that stuff. WWII was my parents' childhood. I heard abut the effect the sacrifices people made-food rationed, etc. I'm not referring to what real people did i eal life. I'm referring to MCU movies, where tehre isn't a single example of ordinary people in the movie being inspired to do something heroic in the movie. Batman works with the consent and support of the GCPD. That's why the GCPD has a Batsignal on top of police headquarters. So they can call Batman for assistance. When they flash the Batsignal in the sky, that's the GCPD requesting assistance from Batman. Can't comprehend Steve Rogers was thinking outside the box. I see that you're too dumb to understand the point. The point isn't Steve Rogers thinking outside the box and being able to get the flag down. The poit is that MCU intentionally made all the other soldiers look so incompetent because none of them could think outside the box and get the flag down. That's MCU's mandate from MCU dictator Kevin Feige. US soldiers must not look heroic and must look corrupt or incompetent so that MCU heroes can look more heroic. Phil Coulson. Steve Rogers was his hero The Howling Commandos were not stupid. Better crew than Trevor's team. They were heroes. Bucky was a hero.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 7, 2017 3:44:55 GMT
Wait.... All this time I haven't noticed... DC Fan doesn't mean DC Comics... It means Dallas Cowboys.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 7, 2017 5:29:47 GMT
It's not bias. It's the truth. you over-exaggerate the humor in Marvel films. No, I don't. It's well-known that MCU films have plenty of jokes and 1-liners, even in battle scenes when people are being injured or killed. your claim that they stand around and do nothing while cracking one liners is completely false. It's not false. It's true. The Chitauri were defeated by 1 nuclear missile launched by the US military. A single nuclear missile. That's all it took to defeat the Chitauri. So the entire battle should've been over in less than 5 minutes. But the battle lasted for about half an hour. Why did the battle last for about half an hour when all that was needed was less than 5 minutes? Because the Avengers were just standing around cracking jokes and 1-liners while the Chitauri were killing civilians! you're a complete DC-shill who's totally biased but that's to be expected from a DC-fanboy I'm not biased. The DC in my username stands for Dallas Cowboys. That's why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star. In regard to what you said about the heroes inspiring other people, you brought up the original Superman films, so I guess your thread isn't limited to only the DCEU or the MCU, but all DC and Marvel films. Well, watch any of the Toby's Spider-Man films and there's always a part when Spidey is struggling and the people of New York step up to help. My examples included Superman II as well as the DECU films, but your only example is from a Sony film. Not a single example from an MCU film of ordinary people being inspired to do something heroic. even in the first Avengers film, Rogers giving orders to the police to help direct civilians away from the destruction. 1st, Rogers gave orders to a traffic cop who gets paid to direct people where to go in case of emergency. So the traffic cop is already doing the job that he's paid to do. I'm referring to ordinary people doing something heroic that they're not paid to do. Perry White and Steve Lombard weren't paid to stay and try to free Jenny from the rubble while the path of destruction was heading towards them, but they did it because they were inspired by the heroics of Superman. Steve Trevor told Sameer, Charlie, and the Chief that he had no more money to pay them for the mission and they were free to leave, but they chose to stay and continue with the mission (without getting paid) because they were inspired by Diana's heroics in liberating the town from the German soldiers. That's what heroism is about. And there isn't a single case of that in MCU films. 2nd, Rogers giving orders to a traffic cop on where people should run to further supports my point #5. New York City is the most populous city in the country and has been the site of more than 1 terrorist attack. So the NYFD and NYPD would certainly already have an evacuation plan in case of emergency and firemen and policemen (especially traffic cops) would certainly already be trained in the best way to evacuate people. So why does a traffic cop need Rogers to tell him how to do something that he's already been trained to do? Because MCU dictator Kevin Feige has mandated that MCU's philosophy is that no one other than the Avengers can look heroic. So US soldiers must look corrupt and incompetent in MCU films. Congressional leaders must look corrupt in MCU films. And even traffic cops must look incompetent in MCU films. the scene with Perry and Lombardi and Jenny was one of the biggest contrivance of the film. the whole scene felt like a big contrivance just to give Perry something to do because he's played by Laurence Fishburne. If you want to talk about contrived scenes, then you need to start with the airport fight scene in Civil War because that's the most contrived scene ever in a CBM. Iron Man knows that Captain America and Bucky are going to be at the airport to hijack the quinjet. So the 1st thing Iron Man should've done was disable the quinjet (i.e. remove the engine or drain the fuel tank or something else to prevent the quinjet from taking off) so that they couldn't hijack the quinjet. Then the 2nd thing Iron Man should've done was set up a trap for Captain America and Bucky (and by trap, I mean something more than just calling Spider-Kid to jump down from the roof and say "Surprise!"). Had Iron Man done either of those 2 things, then there wouldn't have been any airport fight. But they needed a big group fight for the movie (otherwise it would be silly to call it "Civil War") so they put in that contrived airport fight scene. Actually, the entire Civil War movie is nothing but a contrived plothole. Tony and Steve fight because Steve somehow knew that Bucky murdered Tony's parents (even though Steve was frozen in ice when the murders occurred), but Tony (who somehow knew that a random high school kid in a city of 8 million people was the Amazing Spider-Kid) never knew for 25 years that his parents were murdered and thought that they died in a road accident, even though the coroner's report would've noted that Maria Stark had palm prints around her neck and a crushed larynx and the death certificate would've listed Maria Stark's cause of death as asphyxiation due to strangulation. How the hell does dumb-ass Tony Stark think that "asphyxiation due to strangulation" means accidental death in a road accident and nor murder? The whole thing regarding authority. For starters, that's just part of Tony Stark's character. That's your excuse? He's arrogant and egotistic so he shouldn't have to respect the authority of the people? Lame excuse! Scarlet Witch didn't intentionally destroy the building and kill those people. Nevertheless, she did kill those people who wouldn't have been killed if not for the Avengers. So the Avengers still have to be held accountable for that, regardless of how many other lives they may have saved. If a decorated police officer who's saved many people over a 20-year career accidentally shoots and kills a child during a shootout with bank robbers, the police officer still has to held responsible for that even if it wasn't intentional. Roger thinks the best hands is their own, doesn't make him a dictator or tyrant. It does when he refuses to answer to the people (or the elected representatives of the people). You kinda miss the entire point of Roger's character if you don't understand why he acts like he does. I didn't miss the point. I'm the only 1 that got the point. Rogers acts like that because he wants to be a tyrant. You know who else acted the way Rogers did? Hitler, Stalin, Castro, and many other tyrants. They all refused to answer to anyone and thought they should unilaterally decide what's best for the people. what Black Widow said to Congress, what she meant by that is that the world obviously will need the Avengers. The public needs cops to serve and protect too. But when the actions of cops result in the deaths of innocent people, even if it was accidental, the cops still need to be held accountable for that. But the Avengers think that because they're more powerful than everyone else, they shouldn't have to be held accountable for anything and they should be able to do whatever they want whenever they want and Congress can't do anything about it. In regard to portraying soldiers as "incompetent". No soldier or any other figure of authority was necessarily portrayed as incompetent. Those soldiers were portrayed as so incompetent that they couldn't even get the flag down from the flagpole while Rogers was able to do it in mere seconds. the way the portrayed soldiers in the Avengers is no different than than Man of Steel in a big invasion. There was a big difference. In The Incredible Hulk, the US soldiers are portrayed as corrupt and just trying to use the Hulk as a weapon. In MoS, the US soldiers are portrayed as brave, fighting against Zod's army even though they have no superpowers and are no match for Zod's army. The invaders are both aliens so obviously the soldiers aren't going to win the battle. I'm not referring to whether or not the soldiers can win the battle. I'm referring to how the Incredible Hulk portrays the US soldiers as corrupt (their objective was to capture the Hulk so they could use the Hulk as a weapon) vs how MoS portrays US soldiers (their objective was to defend America from Zod's army). Doomsday was really just Zod again. Wasn't really actually Doomsday. But Wonder Woman seemed to have no problem kicking his ass, so he was hardly a challenge. Doomsday was hit with a nuclear missile and still couldn't be stopped. The Chitauri (hundreds of them) were all defeated by a single nuclear missile launched by the US military. Ares was hardly a developed villain Ares was still a better villain than any MCU villain. Ares was just as powerful as Diana and couldn't be defeated by something as silly as a Dance-Off. Man of Steel is even too embarrassed and afraid to put the red underwear on Superman. You must not be up-to-date on the comics. The current comics no longer have the red underwear. MoS is just embracing what's in the current comics. Wonder Woman also embraces the current comics. The original origin story that William Marston wrote in which Diana was sculpted from clay and Zeus breathed life into her has been replaced in the comics and now Diana is the daughter of Zeus and Hippolyta. it wasn't as embarrassing as Batman just standing and watching Superman and Wonder Woman fight Doomsday while he has no idea what to do. Batman was doing more than just standing and watching. Batman was firing the kryptonite smoke bombs at Doomsday. Also, you missed the point. The point wasn't whether or not it was practical for Black Widow to be heavily involved in the battle against the Chitauri. The point was it made no sense for the Chitauri to fly below the height of the buildings, not only obstructing their view but also allowing an Avenger on the ground who can't fly to jump onto 1 of their flying segways and hijack it when they could just stay high in the air above the buildings, where they would not only have a clear unobstructed view of everything on the ground but also have a clear shot at civilians below and there was nothing that Black Widow, Captain America, or Hawkeye could do about it. Even if it were Captain America instead of Black Widow that jumped onto the flying segways and hijacked it, it still wouldn't make sense because why would an experienced invasion force that has such a huge tactical advantage do something so illogical to give up their huge tactical advantage? If you ever watch the Justice League cartoon I've seen every episode of the Justice League and Justice League Unlimited cartoons, but this thread is about the movies and not the cartoons. why didn't Zod just immediately start up the World Engine after capturing Superman. Zod needed to find the codex. Zod didn't know that Jor-El had infused the codex into Kal-El's cells so Zod had to find it. Zod thought the codex might be in the pod that brought Kal-El to Earth. That's why Zod went to Smallville and tried to get Martha to tell him where Kal-El's pod was. why is Lois Lane always in danger? Because she's an investigative reporter and she likes to report on things that people often kill to keep secret. why was she on the plane in the final battle. You really need to pay more attention when you watch the movie. Jor-EL told Lois how to destroy the Black Zero using the Phantom Drive in Kal-El's pod. Lois was the only 1 besides Superman who knew how to use the key to activate the Phantom Drive. Superman had to go destroy the World Engine, which was over the South Indian Ocean. So only Lois knew how to use the key to activate the Phantom Drive. Lois could teach Emil Hamilton or 1 of the soldiers, but General Swanwick felt it was better if Lois went along since she was the only 1 besides Superman who had actually used the key before. after the World Engine just destroyed half a city and killed millions probably, what do Superman and Lois do; they kiss. Here's the exact dialogue. Lois: "You know, they say it's all downhill after the first kiss. " Superman: "I'm pretty sure that only counts when you're kissing a human. "They just prevented the end of the world and survived a war. The natural reaction is to hug and/or kiss someone you love. When you complain about that scene, you're really complaining about all the US soldiers who came back from World War I or World War II and the first thing they did was hug and/or kiss someone they loved. Because that's the natural reaction for anyone who survives a war or a terrorist attack or a natural disaster or some other life-threatening event - they find someone they love and they give them a hug and/or a kiss. Later on, they'll grieve for friends who were lost in the war. But before they grieve, the first thing they do after surviving a war is to take a moment to catch their breath and find someone they love and give the a hug and/or a kiss. That's a natural reaction and there's nothing wrong with that. Captain America: The First Avenger was much worse. Steve Rogers wakes up after 70 years and runs out of the SHIELD building into Times Square. Nick Fury tells Rogers that he had been asleep for 70 years and then asks Rogers "Are you OK?" Someone who had just been fighting a war against the Nazis and then woke up 70 years later, the first thing they would've asked was "Who won the war?" or "Did we win the war?" But Rogers never even asked about the war. Instead the first thing Rogers said was "I had a date". From Rogers' perspective, the day before he was still fighting a war against the Nazis. Suddenly, all Rogers cared about was not getting to go on a date with Peggy Carter. Amy Adams and Henry Cavill had no chemistry with each other. It was a lot more chemistry than the forced romances between the Hulk and Black Widow or between Vision and Scarlett Witch or between Steve Rogers and Peggy Carter's niece. Sharon Carter's aunt just passed away and all Steve Rogers is thinking about is getting inside Sharon Carter's panties. Thor only fought Loki for a couple minutes then was immediately back to helping securing and keeping the Chitauri contained. And combined with him and Iron Man and Hulk, it's pretty believable they were able to maintain some kind of containment. That's 3 people. How do 3 people (including Hulk, who can't even fly) contain hundreds of Chitauri who have flying segways that can fly anywhere in New York City? Like I said, that's bad, illogical writing. The World's Security Council is meant to be like a NATO/UN kind of thing regarding superpowered beings and whatnot, along with SHIELD. So I'm sure they have some provisional authority over all nations. Not the authority to launch a nuclear missile over New York city. Not even NATO or the UN have the authority to do that. And the US government would never allow that. Imagine the Secretary General of the UN or the Secretary General of NATO (neither of whom are elected by the American people) giving an order to launch a nuclear missile over New York city. The American people would never approve of that and the US government would never give them that authority. Only the POTUS has the authority to make the decision whether or not to launch a nuclear missile so it made no sense at all for Nick Fury and the Council to argue over something that they didn't have the authority to decide anyway. Like I said, that's bad, illogical writing. Tony probably didn't even read the autopsy report or anything and was just told where it happened. Not that hard to understand. Even if Tony didn't bother to read the autopsy report: 1. The coroner's report would've still noted that Maria Stark had palm prints around her neck and a crush larynx and therefore the coroner would've ruled their deaths as homicide and not accident. 2. Since the coroner rules their deaths as homicide and not accident, the police are obligated to investigate. 3. Since Tony is next-of-kin, the police are obligated to notify Tony that the coroner ruled their deaths as homicide and not accident. So even if Tony didn't bother to read the autopsy report, Tony still should've known that his parents were murdered and it wasn't a road accident. You mentioned a contrived plot. Well, it doesn't get any more contrive than this. Steve and Tony fight because Steve didn't tell Tony that his parents were murdered. Except that Tony should've already known that his parents were murdered! I just debunked everyone of your points. You haven't debunked anything. On the contrary, you've only further strengthened my points. be sure to provide actual evidence to back up your points I've provided plenty of evidence to back up my points. BTW, here's a great article which gives 15 ways that Wonder Woman is much better than Captain America: The First Avenger. www.cbr.com/15-ways-wonder-woman-is-the-ultimate-captain-america-movie/
|
|