|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 5, 2023 21:36:56 GMT
I did not claim that QAnon was created after Sound of Freedom was made, I said it didn't become a thing till after it was produced, and what I meant by with "become a thing" was that the film was produced before the community and what is about started to be mainstream. The film began development and the script began being worked on in response to an evening news program that ran a story about Tim Ballard and his organization that the filmmakers saw. The movie isn't QAnon adjacent, and it is pretty apolitical. That a group of people showing support for it doesn't make it so, either. Have you watched the film? What did you think? I haven’t seen the film. don’t think I’d be comfortable going into a theater with that kind of audience. Maybe I’ll catch it on VOD. In any case, I can acknowledge that the filmmakers likely didn’t intend for the movie to mimic any kind of QAnon conspiracies back when they made it. Of course, Jim Caviezel is definitely someone who subscribes to that stuff, but as far as I’m aware, he wasn’t involved in the script. If you haven't seen the film, how can you say that it is a QAnon adjacent film? I have seen it and it is definitely not a picture that promotes the community's rhetoric, the feeling is shared by everyone that I know personally who has also seen it. You are not required to engage in conversation with anyone in attendance to see the film at the theater unless you have to get up and leave to use the restroom or other services and get in their view of the screen, and you can always sit somewhere else if the person closest to you projects too many red flags for you if it isn't a packed theater. And no, Jim Caviezel had no involvement in the script. He was offered the lead role and he accepted despite the discouragement of his talent representatives as he deeply connected with the story and felt it was an important one to help tell on screen. His beliefs, whatever they may be, should not reflect the work as a whole. A lot of actors may associate a work they are in with specific rhetoric even if the picture isn't so.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 5, 2023 22:08:46 GMT
I haven’t seen the film. don’t think I’d be comfortable going into a theater with that kind of audience. Maybe I’ll catch it on VOD. In any case, I can acknowledge that the filmmakers likely didn’t intend for the movie to mimic any kind of QAnon conspiracies back when they made it. Of course, Jim Caviezel is definitely someone who subscribes to that stuff, but as far as I’m aware, he wasn’t involved in the script. If you haven't seen the film, how can you say that it is a QAnon adjacent film? I have seen it and it is definitely not a picture that promotes the community's rhetoric, the feeling is shared by everyone that I know personally who has also seen it. You are not required to engage in conversation with anyone in attendance to see the film at the theater unless you have to get up and leave to use the restroom or other services and get in their view of the screen, and you can always sit somewhere else if the person closest to you projects too many red flags for you if it isn't a packed theater. And no, Jim Caviezel had no involvement in the script. He was offered the lead role and he accepted despite the discouragement of his talent representatives as he deeply connected with the story and felt it was an important one to help tell on screen. His beliefs, whatever they may be, should not reflect the work as a whole. A lot of actors may associate a work they are in with specific rhetoric even if the picture isn't so. I was referring to the following the film has. I specifically said that the filmmakers likely didn’t intend to promote any QAnon conspiracies.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 5, 2023 22:09:53 GMT
If you haven't seen the film, how can you say that it is a QAnon adjacent film? I have seen it and it is definitely not a picture that promotes the community's rhetoric, the feeling is shared by everyone that I know personally who has also seen it. You are not required to engage in conversation with anyone in attendance to see the film at the theater unless you have to get up and leave to use the restroom or other services and get in their view of the screen, and you can always sit somewhere else if the person closest to you projects too many red flags for you if it isn't a packed theater. And no, Jim Caviezel had no involvement in the script. He was offered the lead role and he accepted despite the discouragement of his talent representatives as he deeply connected with the story and felt it was an important one to help tell on screen. His beliefs, whatever they may be, should not reflect the work as a whole. A lot of actors may associate a work they are in with specific rhetoric even if the picture isn't so. I was referring to the following the film has. I specifically said that the filmmakers likely didn’t intend for promote any QAnon conspiracies. Okay then.
|
|
selfworth10
Sophomore
@selfworth10
Posts: 416
Likes: 174
|
Post by selfworth10 on Aug 6, 2023 19:07:08 GMT
According to box office mojo , SOF has made zero money outside the US. V_ucking crazy Americans
|
|
|
Post by MrFurious on Aug 6, 2023 21:13:16 GMT
According to box office mojo , SOF has made zero money outside the US. V_ucking crazy Americans I heard its coming to Northern Ireland at the end of August for the DUP (look them up)🤦bunch of biggoted dinosaurs
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 6, 2023 21:17:36 GMT
According to box office mojo , SOF has made zero money outside the US. V_ucking crazy Americans It hasn't been released internationally yet. It will see a release in South Africa on the 18th of this month, and Australia and New Zealand on the 24th. The studio intends to have it release in 23 international markets.
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on Aug 27, 2023 21:28:20 GMT
Anybody saw this? Jim Caviezel is Such an amazing actor. But the two main kids man those shouls get oscar nominated. Amazing acting. I dont get how they did it. Florida Project level talent of kid acting 8/10. One of the best movies this year , amazing , so heartbreaking , sadly it wont receive the recognition or awards it deserves since Hollywood has become very political and corrupt, they never supported this movie because it exposes a lot of what dirty stuff they do in this business . But that's ok because it had the support of the people and yes the kids in the movie should get Oscar nominations but they won't because of the reasons i mentioned above . To the actors who were not afraid and took part in this movie , they are very brave ,Jim Caviezel is amazing, amazing actor I have watched many of his movies and the way he pours his heart and soul in every role he does is touching . It's encouraging to see there are some good actors left in Hollywood who are trying to do the right thing and bring awareness to a very serious issue i also appreciated they didn't get graphic in the movie but we still got to understand what they were referring in a very respectful way.
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on Aug 27, 2023 21:31:59 GMT
According to box office mojo , SOF has made zero money outside the US. V_ucking crazy Americans hard to get the numbers when countries bann the movie , because the stupid globalists wouldnt allow to air it , do you know how many countries banned the movie? look it up hmmmm...i wonder why?
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 28, 2023 2:05:58 GMT
According to box office mojo , SOF has made zero money outside the US. V_ucking crazy Americans hard to get the numbers when countries bann the movie , because the stupid globalists wouldnt allow to air it , do you know how many countries banned the movie? look it up hmmmm...i wonder why?
Funny how Law & Order SVU has tackled the issue of kids sold into sex trafficking to rich people countless times and they NEVER get accused of being a right wing conspiracy.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Aug 28, 2023 16:38:50 GMT
hard to get the numbers when countries bann the movie , because the stupid globalists wouldnt allow to air it , do you know how many countries banned the movie? look it up hmmmm...i wonder why?
Funny how Law & Order SVU has tackled the issue of kids sold into sex trafficking to rich people countless times and they NEVER get accused of being a right wing conspiracy.
Because SVU wasn't funded by QAnonners, right-wing groups didn't pay for people to watch SVU, and right-wing celebrities didn't immediately start accusing people who don't like SVU of being pedophiles.
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 28, 2023 17:17:10 GMT
Funny how Law & Order SVU has tackled the issue of kids sold into sex trafficking to rich people countless times and they NEVER get accused of being a right wing conspiracy.
Because SVU wasn't funded by QAnonners, right-wing groups didn't pay for people to watch SVU, and right-wing celebrities didn't immediately start accusing people who don't like SVU of being pedophiles.
There's a difference in not liking a show, and trying to make sure the public doesn't see it.
And show us the names of people who funded SVU, it takes a lot of money to keep a show going for 23 years.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 28, 2023 19:43:40 GMT
Funny how Law & Order SVU has tackled the issue of kids sold into sex trafficking to rich people countless times and they NEVER get accused of being a right wing conspiracy.
Because SVU wasn't funded by QAnonners, right-wing groups didn't pay for people to watch SVU, and right-wing celebrities didn't immediately start accusing people who don't like SVU of being pedophiles. Sound of Freedom wasn't funded by QAnon, it's co-writer and director as well as the actual person whose work is the basis of the film have openly criticized the movement.
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on Aug 28, 2023 20:05:12 GMT
hard to get the numbers when countries bann the movie , because the stupid globalists wouldnt allow to air it , do you know how many countries banned the movie? look it up hmmmm...i wonder why?
Funny how Law & Order SVU has tackled the issue of kids sold into sex trafficking to rich people countless times and they NEVER get accused of being a right wing conspiracy.
Excatly. This shouldn't be political it should be concerning to all humanity and it should be stopped , mira sorvino who is lead female actress in the movie said something similar along the same lines in an interview. Bad people come from all walks of life .This movie sheds light to a lot of what has been hidden from the world because they didnt want us to know the truth , just like Epsitein Island was once considered a "conspiracy" . They have been shadowbanning the movie and purposely , purposely trying to make people not go and watch it , In my opinion the ones who dont want to allow peole to watch the movie and do all they can to hide it are only admitting guilt .
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 28, 2023 20:15:08 GMT
The same people that said Cuties was perfectly fine entertainment. Oh yeah, there's NOTHING fishy going on there whatsoever, is there?
Funny the people that can suddenly rationalize trying to ban a movie, are the same ones bitching and moaning about hardcore porn books being removed from school libraries saying they're perfectly fine for minor children to read, just not the parents repeating them at a school board meeting.
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on Aug 28, 2023 20:27:34 GMT
The same people that said Cuties was perfectly fine entertainment. Oh yeah, there's NOTHING fishy going on there whatsoever, is there? Funny the people that can suddenly rationalize trying to ban a movie, are the same ones bitching and moaning about hardcore porn books being removed from school libraries saying they're perfectly fine for minor children to read, just not the parents repeating them at a school board meeting. Anything that doesnt fit their sick agenda they will find any excuse in the book to rationalize it , its really sick , i think they are mentally unstable people . I don't watch netflix but i heard about that series cuties they did and its funny its all ok with the complainers , who funds that series? can someone tells us? because its sick . Where are all these caring celebrities who claim to care about children ? why dont they support a film that brings so much awarness to a disgusting worldwide problem? their silence speaks a thousand words.
|
|
|
Post by jon snow loves sansa on Aug 28, 2023 21:10:25 GMT
Tbe differences: right-wing and religious groups are buying tickets to Sound of Freedom en masse and giving them away for free.
So in other words...people WANT to see Sound of Freedom.
yes people want to see it and im glad they beat mainstream hollywood Thanks to the build back better moron a lot people these days have a lot of financial problems even a movie ticket can be too much for them , for those who can paid it forward im glad they were able to and have PEOPLE not right winged or left winged but PEOPLE go and watch it , that is what a good person does I cant believe some of the attacks im reading in this thread regarding Jim Caviezel ! He used to be a favorite in hollywood back in the day and then suddenly once he portrayed Jesus in the passion of christ hollywood banned him and the majority of people are sick and tired of hollywood always praising and awarding roles that always depict meantally ill ,murdereds, rapists ,but portraying jesus i guess its a little too much for them??? like what happened to them? Hollywood has black listed actors , directors who dont support what they like that is not freedom that is not being tolerant as they fake claim to be .
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Aug 29, 2023 0:54:29 GMT
Because SVU wasn't funded by QAnonners, right-wing groups didn't pay for people to watch SVU, and right-wing celebrities didn't immediately start accusing people who don't like SVU of being pedophiles.
There's a difference in not liking a show, and trying to make sure the public doesn't see it.
And show us the names of people who funded SVU, it takes a lot of money to keep a show going for 23 years.
Nobody "tried to make sure" people didn't see Sound of Freedom.
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 29, 2023 3:09:21 GMT
There's a difference in not liking a show, and trying to make sure the public doesn't see it.
And show us the names of people who funded SVU, it takes a lot of money to keep a show going for 23 years.
Nobody "tried to make sure" people didn't see Sound of Freedom.
Disney had it for 5 years, why didn't it come out in 2018? 2019?
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Aug 29, 2023 15:21:20 GMT
Nobody "tried to make sure" people didn't see Sound of Freedom.
Disney had it for 5 years, why didn't it come out in 2018? 2019?
Why did they sell the distribution rights back? They could've made sure it never saw the light of day by simply sitting on it and holding onto the rights. They didn't see it as a profitable venture, but this political statement disguised as a word of mouth campaign for the film has worked wonders.
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 29, 2023 15:45:09 GMT
Disney had it for 5 years, why didn't it come out in 2018? 2019?
Why did they sell the distribution rights back? They could've made sure it never saw the light of day by simply sitting on it and holding onto the rights. They didn't see it as a profitable venture, but this political statement disguised as a word of mouth campaign for the film has worked wonders.
Disney of all people didn't see it as a profitable venture, and yet once the 'nobody' film company that made it got it back, it grossed $150M on a $15M budget. Gee, I wonder how many more people would've gone to see it if it had the DISNEY name slapped on it, advertisements on Facebook and TV spots around the clock every single day up to the big premiere?
|
|