|
Post by Admin on Jan 19, 2024 23:43:05 GMT
If I'm that interlocutor, I'll stop asking the question when you answer it correctly. That very useful paragraph is still there. Just see it as proving further information lol. Pop quiz: Why did I park on the grass?
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Jan 19, 2024 23:58:52 GMT
Bodily autonomy is a human right and it is about freedom to copulate the way you want the time, the place, the partner you desire.. Drinking legal matter is not. It’s either Business law either social law.
None of which has to do with getting an abortion. So abortion is NOT a right. It's NOT bodily autonomy.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 20, 2024 0:15:59 GMT
I beg to differ. If you can’t abort then only safe option is no sex life. Pro choicing is about sex life and most traditionnalist can’t abide the very thought of a married woman having orgasm in wedlock, the very thought of unmarried satisfying coupling almost gaves them aggravation. None of which what btw ? A right is what’s in the law, expression of the general will. So that dépends on where and when for abortion to be a right, excuse my french.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 20, 2024 0:29:58 GMT
Novastar As it comes to legal matter, would you be so kind as to,on the record, consent to let me known to the french voters the nature of the brooks that feeds the let’s them eat void and let’s go debate over ’freedom to abort’ over ’right to abort” in the constitution instead of giving any substantial speech about the next européen élection in order to stage it for the french audience as a pop corn wrestling match macron vs/le pen mill ?
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Jan 20, 2024 2:23:18 GMT
I beg to differ. If you can’t abort then only safe option is no sex life. Pro choicing is about sex life and most traditionnalist can’t abide the very thought of a married woman having orgasm in wedlock, the very thought of unmarried satisfying coupling almost gaves them aggravation. None of which what btw ? A right is what’s in the law, expression of the general will. So that dépends on where and when for abortion to be a right, excuse my french.
You're literally arguing pregnant women can't/don't have sex.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 20, 2024 2:46:31 GMT
I am referring to the 21th century, not the middle age, marine. Notwithstanding the fact that a pregnant woman can have sex, the point is Having pleasurable intercourse, which is forbidden by the canon even and especially when partners are licensed. I take it that your opinion is that in order not to get pregnant woman should... get pregnant, should they ? Suits you, but still that leaves the point of choosing one’s partner, and when woman are not provided with aborting facilities, seldom are they provided with partners of their own will to impregnate them to begin with. Because women are denied abortion by laws, general will expressed in societies who can’t stand the word cunilingus and whose mp are chosen to enforce stricly middle ages legal rules without doing justice to women want and desires.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 20, 2024 2:47:45 GMT
Novastar As it comes to legal matter, would you be so kind as to,on the record, consent to let me known to the french voters the nature of the brooks that feeds the let’s them eat void and let’s go debate over ’freedom to abort’ over ’right to abort” in the constitution instead of giving any substantial speech about the next européen élection in order to stage it for the french audience as a pop corn wrestling match macron vs/le pen mill ? The bump
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 20, 2024 12:33:56 GMT
Novastar As it comes to legal matter, would you be so kind as to,on the record, consent to let me known to the french voters the nature of the brooks that feeds the let’s them eat void and let’s go debate over ’freedom to abort’ over ’right to abort” in the constitution instead of giving any substantial speech about the next européen élection in order to stage it for the french audience as a pop corn wrestling match macron vs/le pen mill ?
The bump
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Jan 20, 2024 15:35:00 GMT
I am referring to the 21th century, not the middle age, marine. Notwithstanding the fact that a pregnant woman can have sex, the point is Having pleasurable intercourse, which is forbidden by the canon even and especially when partners are licensed. I take it that your opinion is that in order not to get pregnant woman should... get pregnant, should they ? Suits you, but still that leaves the point of choosing one’s partner, and when woman are not provided with aborting facilities, seldom are they provided with partners of their own will to impregnate them to begin with. Because women are denied abortion by laws, general will expressed in societies who can’t stand the word cunilingus and whose mp are chosen to enforce stricly middle ages legal rules without doing justice to women want and desires.
People are not 'fighting' for the right to have protected sex in a monogamous relationship with a trusted partner who respects them. And saying women SHOULD seek anything different, let alone be ENCOURAGED to seek anything different, oh and just ignore any and all possible ways that can blow up in their faces and stick them with lifetime consequences for what should've been one night of fun, is actually very insulting to women. 'You need to demean yourself to empower yourself, find men who treat you like disposable garbage because that's a sign of respect'.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 20, 2024 15:42:27 GMT
I am referring to the 21th century, not the middle age, marine. Notwithstanding the fact that a pregnant woman can have sex, the point is Having pleasurable intercourse, which is forbidden by the canon even and especially when partners are licensed. I take it that your opinion is that in order not to get pregnant woman should... get pregnant, should they ? Suits you, but still that leaves the point of choosing one’s partner, and when woman are not provided with aborting facilities, seldom are they provided with partners of their own will to impregnate them to begin with. Because women are denied abortion by laws, general will expressed in societies who can’t stand the word cunilingus and whose mp are chosen to enforce stricly middle ages legal rules without doing justice to women want and desires.
People are not 'fighting' for the right to have protected sex in a monogamous relationship with a trusted partner who respects them. And saying women SHOULD seek anything different, let alone be ENCOURAGED to seek anything different, oh and just ignore any and all possible ways that can blow up in their faces and stick them with lifetime consequences for what should've been one night of fun, is actually very insulting to women. 'You need to demean yourself to empower yourself, find men who treat you like disposable garbage because that's a sign of respect'.
I gather from what is above than I surmized the right logic of yours. I’m sorry if I put bluntly your nose into it. I have just been harrassed and I’m still twitchy.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 20, 2024 15:47:19 GMT
Novastar As it comes to legal matter, would you be so kind as to,on the record, consent to let me known to the french voters the nature of the brooks that feeds the let’s them eat void and let’s go debate over ’freedom to abort’ over ’right to abort” in the constitution instead of giving any substantial speech about the next européen élection in order to stage it for the french audience as a pop corn wrestling match macron vs/le pen mill ? The bump
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jan 27, 2024 19:11:35 GMT
That very useful paragraph is still there. Just see it as proving further information lol. Pop quiz: Why did I park on the grass? I have several reasonable and likely reasons in mind so you ain't so mysterious (= ' impossible to understand, explain'). But you would be best advised first proving the grass exists through offering an informed choice, or such things are moot anyway - and in fact I could well doubt you parked on it at all. But that is where I first came in.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 27, 2024 20:33:14 GMT
Pop quiz: Why did I park on the grass? I have several reasonable and likely reasons in mind so you ain't so mysterious (= ' impossible to understand, explain'). But you would be best advised first proving the grass exists through offering an informed choice, or such things are moot anyway - and in fact I could well doubt you parked on it at all. But that is where I first came in. That is incorrect. Please try again.
|
|
jimmyboy
Sophomore
@jimmyboy
Posts: 164
Likes: 59
|
Post by jimmyboy on Jan 27, 2024 20:53:42 GMT
That very useful paragraph is still there. Just see it as proving further information lol. Pop quiz: Why did I park on the grass? I can think of a couple...... - You couldn't find anywhere else to park - You wanted to smoke it (kidding) - You don't know how to drive properly - You're doing "crazy eights" to impress someone - No reason at all
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 27, 2024 21:09:06 GMT
Pop quiz: Why did I park on the grass? I can think of a couple...... - You couldn't find anywhere else to park - You wanted to smoke it (kidding) - You don't know how to drive properly - You're doing "crazy eights" to impress someone - No reason at all It's a rhetorical question. FF and I both know that he doesn't know, but he won't admit it. So instead, he's dancing around it hoping I won't notice.
|
|
jimmyboy
Sophomore
@jimmyboy
Posts: 164
Likes: 59
|
Post by jimmyboy on Jan 27, 2024 21:14:50 GMT
I can think of a couple...... - You couldn't find anywhere else to park - You wanted to smoke it (kidding) - You don't know how to drive properly - You're doing "crazy eights" to impress someone - No reason at all It's a rhetorical question. FF and I both know that he doesn't know, but he won't admit it. So instead, he's dancing around it hoping I won't notice. Darn. I thought I was providing insight. Instead, I was making a joke. A man has to try.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jan 27, 2024 23:17:06 GMT
I have several reasonable and likely reasons in mind so you ain't so mysterious (= ' impossible to understand, explain'). But you would be best advised first proving the grass exists through offering an informed choice, or such things are moot anyway - and in fact I could well doubt you parked on it at all. But that is where I first came in. That is incorrect. Please try again. My likely reasons are incorrect without even being specified? How does that work then? And how would you prove I was wrong when you have every incentive to just deny every suggestion out of hand (as demonstrated)? Oh yes, and more importantly this latest from you to jimmyboy: That would be a type of question then, asked in order to make a statement, that does not expect or want an answer (not that no answer is possible, here one notes, when quite a few can be offered and were.) So why did you keep asking for one? And why then dismiss my putative answers unseen? Now, that is mysterious lol Meanwhile we still await persuading that your parking choice is not imaginary. Since if it is, then your reasons are too - and any suggestions moot, just as I said. I can also, it hardly needs to be said, offer theoretical answers to a theoretical question (jimmyboy's will do) and, just as theoretically, be correct.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Jan 28, 2024 0:25:18 GMT
Novastar6 You wrote People are not 'fighting' for the right to have protected sex in a monogamous relationship with a trusted partner who respects them. 1 And saying women SHOULD seek anything different, let alone be ENCOURAGED to seek anything different, oh and just ignore any and all possible ways that can blow up in their faces and stick them with lifetime consequences for what should've been one night of fun, is actually very insulting to women. ’You need to demean yourself to empower yourself, find men who treat you like disposable garbage because that's a sign of respect'.
1 They should imho. Besides, what is the link between protection and orgasm ? Somehow ... I would not say that Mozart’s music is made of too many musical notes. Trust... and respect ... But say, why the restriction : monogamy ? What about multiple partners, orgasms And abortion? Oh, yes, that is the should seek part. I don’t write they should seek pleasure. They do. Someone else wrote that long ago, and it’s about everyone. Where is the insulting part ? What is insulting in pleasure ? Maybe the changes in the recent past stopped short of actual equality, condition for freedom. Somehow, some males gained easer access to the other gender or it would seem so, and reverse is not true. That not unheard in local feminist speech. Mho is that equality not restricted is the only option in the long run. Yes, anyone must live anyone’s life. The rest of your post does not make sense.(empowerment and trash behavior, I suspect you are hinting as smtg vaguely professional) Sole man who instruct an orphan girl doing so does it in a work of fiction, to begin with. Seconds, when there had been equal accès to food, shoes, clothes, housing, comfort, work, for the destitute in the time he wrote, the book would not have made any possible sense. Not that things changed much.
Bodily autonomy is a human right and it is about freedom to copulate the way you want the time, the place, the partner you desire. . Drinking legal matter is not. It’s either Business law either social law.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 28, 2024 1:04:46 GMT
That is incorrect. Please try again. My likely reasons are incorrect without even being specified? How does that work then? And how would you prove I was wrong when you have every incentive to just deny every suggestion out of hand (as demonstrated)? Oh yes, and more importantly this latest from you to jimmyboy: That would be a type of question then, asked in order to make a statement, that does not expect or want an answer (not that no answer is possible, here one notes, when quite a few can be offered and were.) So why did you keep asking for one? And why then dismiss my putative answers unseen? Now, that is mysterious lol Meanwhile we still await persuading that your parking choice is not imaginary. Since if it is, then your reasons are too - and any suggestions moot, just as I said. I can also, it hardly needs to be said, offer theoretical answers to a theoretical question (jimmyboy's will do) and, just as theoretically, be correct. Sorry, wrong again.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 28, 2024 1:05:53 GMT
Bodily autonomy is a human right and it is about freedom to copulate the way you want the time, the place, the partner you desire. Is that a Ted Bundy quote?
|
|