|
Post by ck100 on Apr 29, 2024 22:34:39 GMT
Disney/Lucasfilm introduced the cast/crew of "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" to the world via pictures/video of the script table read. Back when there was promising hope that Star Wars could be great again.... I had some excitement seeing the old cast and writer Lawrence Kasdan take part in this although I wasn't so keen on seeing J.J. Abrams chosen as the director/co-writer. www.yahoo.com/entertainment/10-years-ago-force-awakens-190000449.html
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Apr 29, 2024 22:45:32 GMT
Looking back on the sequel trilogy, The Force Awakens is a pretty good, albeit very safe, movie. I’ll continue to defend The Last Jedi. The Skywalker Rises is ranked with The Phantom Menace as my least favorite in the series.
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Apr 30, 2024 0:00:20 GMT
Looking back on the sequel trilogy, The Force Awakens is a pretty good, albeit very safe, movie. I’ll continue to defend The Last Jedi. The Skywalker Rises is ranked with The Phantom Menace as my least favorite in the series. In retrospect I reckon The Force Awakens aged the best because it was the safest and the first of the sequence. Following it came ambitious and then damage control. TFA could almost pass for being part of the others before it went off the rails.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Apr 30, 2024 0:09:36 GMT
I knew it would suck. They waited too long to bring back the old cast--should have done it in the 1990s.
|
|
|
Post by Winston Wolfe on Apr 30, 2024 3:14:42 GMT
Disney/Lucasfilm introduced the cast/crew of "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" to the world via pictures/video of the script table read. Back when there was promising hope that Star Wars could be great again....I had some excitement seeing the old cast and writer Lawrence Kasdan take part in this although I wasn't so keen on seeing J.J. Abrams chosen as the director/co-writer. www.yahoo.com/entertainment/10-years-ago-force-awakens-190000449.html
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Apr 30, 2024 3:30:52 GMT
Do any of you remember this or your reaction to it outside of retrospective feelings on the Star Wars sequel trilogy?
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Apr 30, 2024 4:45:53 GMT
Later in the year will be 10 year anniversary of Star Wars: Rebels. Only watching it now but it's fantastic and respectful to the Lucas movies.
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Apr 30, 2024 4:48:31 GMT
Do any of you remember this or your reaction to it outside of retrospective feelings on the Star Wars sequel trilogy? I do remember seeing that black and white pic on IMDb yeah, and probably followed all the news coming out and stuff like that. Something looked very off about a lot of it, which maybe should have been a red flag, but I was still very excited. I even went to a midnight screening of it and it was heartbreaking. Never had I been so disappointed in a piece of media ever up to that point.
|
|
|
Post by Cat on Apr 30, 2024 4:52:16 GMT
Do any of you remember this or your reaction to it outside of retrospective feelings on the Star Wars sequel trilogy? No, I never knew about this till now. I like that R2 is in the box there.
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Apr 30, 2024 6:17:27 GMT
I found The Force Awakens to be a moderately enjoyable sequel. The action sequences were well choregraphed and it had some impactful moments. The story was half-baked though and the villains lacked depth or even any comprehensible motive. It was fun, bright, flashy but ultimately highly derivative of its precursors and narratively vacuous. Typical Abrams fare, in other words. Not a patch on the Original Trilogy.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Apr 30, 2024 6:28:30 GMT
I’m not a fan of this new trilogy, but it’s really TRoS that kills it. TFA is boring and derivative, but TLJ made a few really good decisions to setup a cool finale.
TRoS threw all the cool setup away and used the garbage to keep it moving. It makes the whole trilogy feel like a failure.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Apr 30, 2024 7:05:18 GMT
They followed the blueprint that Lucas had in 1982. The description that Gary Kurtz gave of the storyline in 2005 was pretty close. He said Luke goes off somewhere, Leia becomes leader, Han dies, then Luke seeks the Other and confronts the Emperor in episode 9.
The only real change is that Luke was not so important but it is guaranteed that Lucas would have done the same thing and had him be irrelevant or make a woman do the final victory.
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Apr 30, 2024 20:43:06 GMT
I don't remember having any big thoughts either way. I think I was moderately interested in seeing different visions from George (who, despite slight reappraisal, had just overseen three very poorly made films) but Disney/JJ Abrams are basically the antithesis of "vision". TFA ended up being entertaining, but the exact movie I thought it would be when you say "Disney produced, JJ directed Star Wars". Rogue One was plagued with distracting fanservice and a boring first half, and killing a bunch of characters we didn't know or care about didn't make it fresh or interesting to me. It wasn't until Johnson snuck something with some actual creative juice under the table with TLJ that my excitement for Star Wars was rejuvenated. Then the rest happened.
|
|
|
Post by janntosh on Apr 30, 2024 20:57:40 GMT
This garbage trilogy is the main representation of everything wrong with Hollywood these days
I will admit I was excited at first though
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on May 2, 2024 2:50:26 GMT
I was sincerely hoping we were going to, finally, expand the SW universe throughout its galaxy far far away... instead we go back to Tatooine, & yet another f'n Death Star. I gave it permission for things to begin its trilogy... alas TLJ is stupid (slow convoy of ships being chased by an even slower convoy of ships) & ROTS is just lame.
That said, it was worth 3 Disney movies just to give me Rogue One - which I prefer even to ESB.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 2, 2024 12:35:58 GMT
I was sincerely hoping we were going to, finally, expand the SW universe throughout its galaxy far far away... instead we go back to Tatooine, & yet another f'n Death Star. I gave it permission for things to begin its trilogy... alas TLJ is stupid (slow convoy of ships being chased by an even slower convoy of ships) & ROTS is just lame. That said, it was worth 3 Disney movies just to give me Rogue One - which I prefer even to ESB. Exactly. TFA was a forgivable rehash, so long as they're using it to get people on board and kick start something new. But TLJ was a terrible script filled with completely nonsensical ideas, and then they course corrected with an even lazier rehash in TROS. What a mess. If only Disney had filmed some of the extended universe novels instead of deleting them from canon when they bought Lucasfilm. Agreed on Rogue One, as well. Have to give them credit for the best Star Wars content since the original trilogy-- and for having the balls to kill all of the main characters. But that sequel trilogy is an absolute disaster. I actually had a similar experience with the Star Trek reboot. The first one was a passable sci-fi actioner featuring capable actors doing impressions of the original cast. The script wasn't great, but I was willing to accept the movie if it led to greater things. But it immediately went off a cliff with an awful attempt at a remake of Wrath of Khan. It's insane how these studios can't seem to hire creative minds who understand what was great about these properties to begin with.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on May 2, 2024 15:17:36 GMT
They seemed to force the Rey character into some SW superheroine with the greatest arc ever... & they ground that idea down to dust where I (we?) don't even care about her good or bad, she's just there. I'd have zero nostalgic feels if she walked into a SW scene 20yrs from now out of the blue.
|
|
mgmarshall
Junior Member
@mgmarshall
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 3,304
|
Post by mgmarshall on May 2, 2024 15:40:35 GMT
Looking back on the sequel trilogy, The Force Awakens is a pretty good, albeit very safe, movie. I’ll continue to defend The Last Jedi. The Skywalker Rises is ranked with The Phantom Menace as my least favorite in the series. I'm about here in my opinion of them.
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on May 2, 2024 23:16:42 GMT
I had hope then.
|
|
|
Post by Winston Wolfe on May 3, 2024 0:17:33 GMT
They followed the blueprint that Lucas had in 1982. The description that Gary Kurtz gave of the storyline in 2005 was pretty close. He said Luke goes off somewhere, Leia becomes leader, Han dies, then Luke seeks the Other and confronts the Emperor in episode 9. The only real change is that Luke was not so important but it is guaranteed that Lucas would have done the same thing and had him be irrelevant or make a woman do the final victory. Oh, is it guaranteed? Is it?
|
|