|
Post by Winston Wolfe on May 9, 2024 14:26:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 9, 2024 14:40:40 GMT
Is this a joke? Who wants to watch a movie about that sniveling little shit?
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on May 9, 2024 15:19:03 GMT
This seems like a bad idea.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on May 9, 2024 15:28:14 GMT
We should have left the LOTR franchise to just the three trilogy films (I like the Hobbit movies overall, but feel done after the LOTR and Hobbit films together). Warner Bros. wants to turn it into "Star Wars" and oversaturate it like Disney. I also think Peter Jackson and his gang should focus on new stuff instead of past stuff like LOTR.
|
|
|
Post by Pangolin on May 9, 2024 15:34:16 GMT
Is this a joke? Who wants to watch a movie about that sniveling little shit? It's a strange choice, especially after that flopping video game about Gollum last year.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 9, 2024 16:26:33 GMT
Ah but Gollum is the favorite of Hollywood because he is the outsider--the nebbish subversive one. Hollywood loves David and Goliath themes so Gollum is the best thing they have for that.
I'd rather they do a story about Balrogs holding a breakdance competition.
Burnin' 2: Moria Boogaloo
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on May 9, 2024 17:15:07 GMT
Is this a joke? Who wants to watch a movie about that sniveling little shit? I'm not really lining up for spinoff prequels about any of the characters, but I resent your tone. Gollum rules.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on May 9, 2024 19:31:31 GMT
Lame
|
|
|
Post by 博:Dr.BLΔD€:锯 on May 9, 2024 19:55:22 GMT
How many bloody spin-offs can we get from Lord 0f The Flies. A chunky bunch were rescued from the island, albeit a bit politically skued. Let it lie. Forget this, Hollywood.....what we need....or I need primarily is more shark movies . With or without frickin' laser beams and/or hot crumpet....I'm easy.
|
|
|
Post by jcush on May 9, 2024 20:26:06 GMT
I love Gollum, but I can't say this idea does much for me.
|
|
GiantFan1980
Junior Member
@scifi1980
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 4,482
|
Post by GiantFan1980 on May 9, 2024 21:39:16 GMT
Funny. How many years people said that they would NEVER make any more LOTR stuff past the trilogy we got in the early 2000's. They said the same thing for years about Mary Poppins after the Disney movie back in the 60's.
Copyrights, ownership, and gate keeping of a label won't stop Hollywood from getting their mitts on an intellectual property and rebooting it over and over again.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on May 9, 2024 22:06:38 GMT
|
|
Reynard
Sophomore
@reynard
Posts: 647
Likes: 317
|
Post by Reynard on May 10, 2024 0:55:34 GMT
Funny. How many years people said that they would NEVER make any more LOTR stuff past the trilogy we got in the early 2000's. They said the same thing for years about Mary Poppins after the Disney movie back in the 60's. Copyrights, ownership, and gate keeping of a label won't stop Hollywood from getting their mitts on an intellectual property and rebooting it over and over again. Makes me wonder how the licenses to Tolkien's works are divided at the moment. J.R.R. Tolkien was well-known for wanting to keep his works mostly locked up and and Christopher Tolkien continued that tradition, though he did finally agree to the Netflix series, allegedly under immense pressure from many other members of the Tolkien estate. Interestingly, there was nothing in the Hollywood Reporter article about the Tolkien estate being involved with these. Did they even have any say, or can the Warners make new films on their own just because they hold the rights to the LotR & Hobbit trilogies? I wonder. Anyway, I do not at all like the concept of making individual movies for LotR characters. Tolkien intentionally wrote "types", not characters (characters as "psychological complexes", as in most modern literature). This lack of needless psychologization is a major "invisible" part of his work; it gives his books a kind of universal appeal and in part their mythological feeling. "Background story" films can only take away from mythological/philosophical/religious themes so dear to Tolkien's heart, since characters defined this way will come to be more psychologized and thus will no longer present something more universal as Tolkien intended. LotR should never become a franchise, since franchises always work by adding more and then even more and going more into details; it's the exact opposite of Tolkien's essentialism.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on May 10, 2024 1:10:17 GMT
The fact that this announcement came during an earnings call says a lot.
|
|
|
Post by Xcalatë on May 10, 2024 6:10:53 GMT
Calling it now it will have: Crappy CGI, some random DEI and a bland story.
|
|