|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Jun 7, 2017 16:23:36 GMT
4/10
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemaniac22 on Jun 7, 2017 18:18:43 GMT
I gave it a 6 on imdb. I have to be honest it's not really a movie for the masses. I'm a fan of movies based on the entertainment industry, but I found the plot to be a little lame. But the style, direction and cinematography I appreciated. I think it's meant to be something like 'Twin Peaks'. Some people like it, some won't.
Was there anything in particular you hated?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 0:30:19 GMT
4/10 isn't a bad score given all the hate for this movie. It is very much style over substance. The visuals are beyond amazing, but there's not much else beyond a heavy-handed critique of Hollywood and the fashion industry. All of that said, I thought it was great and would give it a 9/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Jun 9, 2017 16:28:23 GMT
The ONLY reasons I gave it a 4 were the visuals, and the only good thing about it was Fanning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 23:38:37 GMT
The ONLY reasons I gave it a 4 were the visuals, and the only good thing about it was Fanning. I've seen her in a couple of things now and the jury is still out on whether she can act. I didn't think much of her performance here. |
|
|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Jun 12, 2017 14:38:49 GMT
The ONLY reasons I gave it a 4 were the visuals, and the only good thing about it was Fanning. I've seen her in a couple of things now and the jury is still out on whether she can act. I didn't think much of her performance here.  |
|
|
|
Post by moviemaniac22 on Jun 12, 2017 18:43:32 GMT
Fanning was lame. She came across so lame. They should have chose Chloe Moretz if they wanted a younger star. Fanning was a dumb choice. Half of the time she was just mummering lines and giving the supporting actors blank stares.
|
|
