|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 0:20:22 GMT
For the record, the effeminate EEh is still blocked. I only saw his last response after I logged out. I can still see the threads he starts when I'm logged in, and the only time he starts a thread is for one of his stupid and petty callouts, like this one. And that's the long and the short of that. For the record, nobody believes you, and nobody cares! The fact that you felt it necessary to broadcast this particular point AFTER responding to a guy you supposedly have on ignore belies any relevance your alleged blocking might have. And you're nobody, faggot. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 19, 2017 1:08:25 GMT
For the record, nobody believes you, and nobody cares! The fact that you felt it necessary to broadcast this particular point AFTER responding to a guy you supposedly have on ignore belies any relevance your alleged blocking might have. And you're nobody, faggot. Did you not get the hint when I deleted this the first time you posted it? |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 19, 2017 1:16:55 GMT
And you're nobody, faggot. Did you not get the hint when I deleted this the first time you posted it? Maybe he's trying fill the void of stupidity that Ada and Cody left behind. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 1:26:10 GMT
And you're nobody, faggot. Did you not get the hint when I deleted this the first time you posted it? No. I thought it simply failed to post. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 1:27:12 GMT
Did you not get the hint when I deleted this the first time you posted it? Maybe he's trying fill the void of stupidity that Ada and Cody left behind. Maybe you're a troll. Yeah, maybe that. |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 19, 2017 1:29:10 GMT
Maybe he's trying fill the void of stupidity that Ada and Cody left behind. Maybe you're a troll. Yeah, maybe that. Witty retort, I'm surprised you didn't call me a "faggot" |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 1:30:18 GMT
Maybe you're a troll. Yeah, maybe that. Witty retort Which one were you on the old board? Bazarov? |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 19, 2017 1:58:06 GMT
Which one were you on the old board? Bazarov? Baz isn't on the forums anymore. We chat on PS now and again, tried to get him on, he's not interested. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 2:04:57 GMT
Which one were you on the old board? Bazarov? Baz isn't on the forums anymore. We chat on PS now and again, tried to get him on, he's not interested. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 19, 2017 10:11:44 GMT
And you're nobody, faggot. Did you not get the hint when I deleted this the first time you posted it? Erjen doesn't get hints...ever, unless you post it in a grainy Youtube video. He's been getting aroused by naked men since he was ten years old, still no hint, not even a clue. He thinks it's Nazi thought control. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 10:15:07 GMT
Did you not get the hint when I deleted this the first time you posted it? Erjen doesn't get hints...ever, unless you post it in a grainy Youtube video. He's been getting aroused by naked men since he was ten years old, still no hint, not even a clue. He thinks it's Nazi thought control. Piss off, Cash. Go play with your guns. |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 19, 2017 10:17:49 GMT
Erjen doesn't get hints...ever, unless you post it in a grainy Youtube video. He's been getting aroused by naked men since he was ten years old, still no hint, not even a clue. He thinks it's Nazi thought control. Piss off, Cash. Go play with your guns. Why don't you go look at the logo for harddawn.com and see if anything "dawns" on you. Just repeat "hard dawn" as many times as necessary until you finally get the hint. That might keep you busy for months. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 10:23:59 GMT
Piss off, Cash. Go play with your guns. Why don't you go look at the logo for harddawn.com and see if anything "dawns" on you. Just repeat "hard dawn" as many times as necessary until you finally get the hint. That might keep you busy for months. Please keep your nonsense out of the discussion. Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jun 19, 2017 10:24:10 GMT
Maybe he finally became still.  I can't read any of his posts without thinking of that clip. I have to physically stop myself from linking it in response to all his posts. |
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Jun 19, 2017 11:36:06 GMT
For the record, nobody believes you, and nobody cares! The fact that you felt it necessary to broadcast this particular point AFTER responding to a guy you supposedly have on ignore belies any relevance your alleged blocking might have. And you're nobody, faggot. ^ "True" Christian!  |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jun 19, 2017 11:38:23 GMT
And you're nobody, faggot. ^ "True" Christian! Be gentle with him, he's swirling in his cups. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 16:40:46 GMT
And you're nobody, faggot. ^ "True" Christian! Are you the true Captain Bryce, or an imposter? |
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Jun 19, 2017 16:44:42 GMT
^ "True" Christian! Are you the true Captain Bryce, or an imposter? 1) There has only ever been ONE of me. 2) I have no "socks". 3) What motivation would someone else have of impersonating me? 4) What motivation would I possibly have for impersonating someone else? 5) What motivation would you have for even suggesting this in the first place? 6) How does this question in any way address, invalidate, or relate to or the comment? 7) How would any answer validate the statement you made with respect to your supposed Christian identity? |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 19, 2017 16:47:55 GMT
Are you the true Captain Bryce, or an imposter? 1) There has only ever been ONE of me. 2) I have no "socks". 3) What motivation would someone else have of impersonating me? 4) What motivation would I possibly have for impersonating someone else? 5) What motivation would you have for even suggesting this in the first place? 6) How does this question in any way address, invalidate, or relate to or the comment? 7) How would any answer validate the statement you made with respect to your supposed Christian identity? Presenting a well-known poster who claimed to believe in God and then left it for "atheism" would be a strong motivation for some unscrupulous person. |
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Jun 19, 2017 22:11:04 GMT
1) There has only ever been ONE of me. 2) I have no "socks". 3) What motivation would someone else have of impersonating me? 4) What motivation would I possibly have for impersonating someone else? 5) What motivation would you have for even suggesting this in the first place? 6) How does this question in any way address, invalidate, or relate to or the comment? 7) How would any answer validate the statement you made with respect to your supposed Christian identity? Presenting a well-known poster who claimed to believe in God and then left it for "atheism" would be a strong motivation for some unscrupulous person. To what end exactly? What would be the point of someone doing that, and why would you choose to believe that other than the simpler, more obvious answer? You didn't actually answer the questions. If you were actually able to, then you might understand why your suspicion doesn't add up. There is no logical motivation for why I'd pretend to be someone I'm not, and if there is, you haven't been able to articulate it. More relevant than your suspicion is your motivation for introducing that idea in the first place. The fact is you never thought that I was a believer even when I was one. You didn't like me back then because (using the bible and from a Christian perspective) I often made your arguments look stupid and you look hypocrite. Now you don't like me because I'm able to do exactly the same thing as an atheist. And the reason I am able to do that isn't because you are a Christian, it's because you are stupid, you are a poor debater, and a bad representative of the religion you claim to profess. There are other Christians on here who I fundamentally disagree with in terms of belief. But they are able to support their beliefs better than you, and they at least present themselves as someone who practices Christianity. And that's why I didn't go after them before and why I don't go after them now. So at the end of the day, it doesn't matter if you believe that I am a different poster now, or the same one because I'm accomplishing exactly the same effect. (By the way, I could prove to you that I'm the same person pretty easily if I wanted to. Another poster had similar suspicions and I was able to confirm my identity to them with some simple test questions. The reason I haven't "proved" myself to you is because you want me to. Therefore I don't want to. I have nothing to gain by "convincing you", and it's more entertaining to watch you scratch your head in confusion, and try to rationalize why your assumption might be true, even when it makes no sense). When you actually demonstrate some humility, acknowledge when you are wrong, and answer other people's questions that you have a penchant for avoiding, then I might oblige you.  |
|
