|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jun 18, 2017 22:50:32 GMT
Think his deal is 6 pictures right? Wasn't that for CW, IW, AVG4, and three solos? I would hope as young as Tom Holland will be able to stick around longer than that, since he's the perfect age to take his Spider-Man through more than Maguire or Garfield ever could. Tom seems to be really into playing Peter, so maybe he'll be extended his contract to add more films? Maybe he'll be the Tony stark of MCU in phase 6 and 7. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2017 22:52:42 GMT
I would hope as young as Tom Holland will be able to stick around longer than that, since he's the perfect age to take his Spider-Man through more than Maguire or Garfield ever could. Tom seems to be really into playing Peter, so maybe he'll be extended his contract to add more films? Maybe he'll be the Tony stark of MCU in phase 6 and 7. Maybe. I'll be interesting if he's able to make films that represent each of the major eras of the Spider-Man comics. |
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jun 18, 2017 22:53:31 GMT
So would this include the Tom Hardy (R-rated) Venom movie? Something tells me that Hardy wouldn't sign on to the MCU or any big franchises like that.
I also can't see the MCU going for an R-rated movie quite yet, which I would agree with. Nevertheless, this is good news.
|
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 18, 2017 23:01:27 GMT
meh. i was perfectly happy to let Sony take Venom and fuck him up while the adults used the real characters. And reason came with a red and black avatar... What substantive contribution has Venom/Eddie Brock made to Spider-Man lore besides excessive salivation? I don't get the fanboy hard-on for this character. It's a pile of black space goo that is butt hurt because Peter Parker didn't want to marry it. SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 23:04:46 GMT
Think his deal is 6 pictures right? Wasn't that for CW, IW, AVG4, and three solos? I would hope as young as Tom Holland will be able to stick around longer than that, since he's the perfect age to take his Spider-Man through more than Maguire or Garfield ever could. It would be interesting to see the MCU last another 20 years and for Holland to still be around. By then he would be a big time veteran with tons of appearances and likely will have outlasted everybody else by then. That would be cool to look back on. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 23:05:39 GMT
Think his deal is 6 pictures right? Wasn't that for CW, IW, AVG4, and three solos? Like I just said. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 18, 2017 23:10:34 GMT
I was confirming your statement which was posed as a question. SaveSave |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2017 23:26:02 GMT
I would hope as young as Tom Holland will be able to stick around longer than that, since he's the perfect age to take his Spider-Man through more than Maguire or Garfield ever could. It would be interesting to see the MCU last another 20 years and for Holland to still be around. By then he would be a big time veteran with tons of appearances and likely will have outlasted everybody else by then. That would be cool to look back on. Boy, that'd be magnificent. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 23:27:53 GMT
I was confirming your statement which was posed as a question. SaveSaveYeah I know, I was just saying that's cool, we're on the same page :-) |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 19, 2017 1:59:53 GMT
Okay...make up your minds then.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 19, 2017 2:02:45 GMT
Okay...make up your minds then. I suspect this means a loose continuity. No major obvious connections, but no contradictions, so you can kind of take it or leave it as you like. And I imagine that they may become tighter later if all goes well. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 19, 2017 2:54:07 GMT
Okay...make up your minds then. I suspect this means a loose continuity. No major obvious connections, but no contradictions, so you can kind of take it or leave it as you like. And I imagine that they may become tighter later if all goes well. It doesn't make sense that Venom would already exist in a world where Peter is a High School student. All of this is far from cool and Venom brings zero to the table for Spider-Man thematically. This development is nothing to be praised or excited about. Venom's premature and forced insertion into the MCU will damage the carefully crafted shared universe Marvel has built thus far. Venom should be a separate but equal venture. This wreaks of Sony wanting a bigger share of MCU good will to help power their ill-conceived and exploitative Spider-Verse. SaveSave |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2017 3:20:36 GMT
I suspect this means a loose continuity. No major obvious connections, but no contradictions, so you can kind of take it or leave it as you like. And I imagine that they may become tighter later if all goes well. It doesn't make sense that Venom would already exist in a world where Peter is a High School student. All of this is far from cool and Venom brings zero to the table for Spider-Man thematically. This development is nothing to be praised or excited about. Venom's premature and forced insertion into the MCU will damage the carefully crafted shared universe Marvel has built thus far. Venom should be a separate but equal venture. This wreaks of Sony wanting a bigger share of MCU good will to help power their ill-conceived and exploitative Spider-Verse. SaveSaveThe reason we're rejoicing is because when Sony first announced their Spideyverse, it seemed like they wanted to just ride off the MCU's popularity and then break away from them, taking Tom Holland with them. At least this way we might be able to keep Holland for an extended period of time and can just ignore the dumb side movies. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 19, 2017 3:46:06 GMT
It doesn't make sense that Venom would already exist in a world where Peter is a High School student. All of this is far from cool and Venom brings zero to the table for Spider-Man thematically. This development is nothing to be praised or excited about. Venom's premature and forced insertion into the MCU will damage the carefully crafted shared universe Marvel has built thus far. Venom should be a separate but equal venture. This wreaks of Sony wanting a bigger share of MCU good will to help power their ill-conceived and exploitative Spider-Verse. SaveSaveThe reason we're rejoicing is because when Sony first announced their Spideyverse, it seemed like they wanted to just ride off the MCU's popularity and then break away from them, taking Tom Holland with them. At least this way we might be able to keep Holland for an extended period of time and can just ignore the dumb side movies. My plan is watch Venom and ignore the dumb Homecoming movie you're gonna owe me ten bucks for not seeing. So we'll even it out. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 19, 2017 4:11:39 GMT
It doesn't make sense that Venom would already exist in a world where Peter is a High School student. All of this is far from cool and Venom brings zero to the table for Spider-Man thematically. This development is nothing to be praised or excited about. Venom's premature and forced insertion into the MCU will damage the carefully crafted shared universe Marvel has built thus far. Venom should be a separate but equal venture. This wreaks of Sony wanting a bigger share of MCU good will to help power their ill-conceived and exploitative Spider-Verse. SaveSaveThe reason we're rejoicing is because when Sony first announced their Spideyverse, it seemed like they wanted to just ride off the MCU's popularity and then break away from them, taking Tom Holland with them. At least this way we might be able to keep Holland for an extended period of time and can just ignore the dumb side movies. Okay, the way I see it, Sony is getting greedy. They already stand to gain a considerable boost from independently releasing Spider-Man movies that are canonically connected to the MCU and produced by the Marvel Studios think tank - aka the hitmakers. They can also make unconnected "side movies" features other Spider-Man characters. If the "side movies" take place in the MCU - Marvel needs creative control over them. I understand that Venom and Carnage are hugely popular characters because they look good on comic-book covers and t-shirts. If you look more closely at these two bargain-basements, xenomorph rip-offs, they have little to offer other than mugging for the camera and telling us about how they "like being bad." If Sony can turn those two cardboard cutouts into three-dimension performances, God bless them. I think we're in for more Electro-type garbage with both of them. SaveSave |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2017 4:31:11 GMT
The reason we're rejoicing is because when Sony first announced their Spideyverse, it seemed like they wanted to just ride off the MCU's popularity and then break away from them, taking Tom Holland with them. At least this way we might be able to keep Holland for an extended period of time and can just ignore the dumb side movies. Okay, the way I see it, Sony is getting greedy. They already stand to gain a considerable boost from independently releasing Spider-Man movies that are canonically connected to the MCU and produced by the Marvel Studios think tank - aka the hitmakers. They can also make unconnected "side movies" features other Spider-Man characters. If the "side movies" take place in the MCU - Marvel needs creative control over them. I understand that Venom and Carnage are hugely popular characters because they look good on comic-book covers and t-shirts. If you look more closely at these two bargain-basements, xenomorph rip-offs, they have little to offer other than mugging for the camera and telling us about how they "like being bad." If Sony can turn those two cardboard cutouts into three-dimension performances, God bless them. I think we're in for more Electro-type garbage with both of them. SaveSaveWell, if nothing else, it'll reinforce how much they need Marvel's input to do it. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 19, 2017 4:42:09 GMT
Okay, the way I see it, Sony is getting greedy. They already stand to gain a considerable boost from independently releasing Spider-Man movies that are canonically connected to the MCU and produced by the Marvel Studios think tank - aka the hitmakers. They can also make unconnected "side movies" features other Spider-Man characters. If the "side movies" take place in the MCU - Marvel needs creative control over them. I understand that Venom and Carnage are hugely popular characters because they look good on comic-book covers and t-shirts. If you look more closely at these two bargain-basements, xenomorph rip-offs, they have little to offer other than mugging for the camera and telling us about how they "like being bad." If Sony can turn those two cardboard cutouts into three-dimension performances, God bless them. I think we're in for more Electro-type garbage with both of them. SaveSaveWell, if nothing else, it'll reinforce how much they need Marvel's input to do it. Ten dollars!  |
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Jun 19, 2017 7:37:08 GMT
As long Venom will be still an Rated-R movie, i dont care, if he is part of the MCU.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Jun 19, 2017 7:46:27 GMT
"Think his deal is 6 pictures right? Wasn't that for CW, IW, AVG4, and three solos?
I would hope as young as Tom Holland will be able to stick around longer than that, since he's the perfect age"
He already turned 21 few weeks ago. His age doesnt fit this role anymore.
|
|
Lee
Sophomore
@neo
Posts: 327
Likes: 177
 
|
Post by Lee on Jun 19, 2017 8:14:33 GMT
As long Venom will be still an Rated-R movie, i dont care, if he is part of the MCU. I hope so. It will complete boring, if we get another PG-13 comic book movie. We need some new things and fresh air. |
|
