blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 21, 2017 18:18:07 GMT
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 21, 2017 18:29:40 GMT
Here's a better question why do liberals who obsess over science ignore observable embryology?
[and don't tell me you don't ignore it because you do "it's just a clump of cells" "it's not alive" etc. etc.]
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 21, 2017 18:32:44 GMT
Here's a better question why do liberals who obsess over science ignore observable embryology? [and don't tell me you don't ignore it because you do "it's just a clump of cells" "it's not alive" etc. etc.] When they say that, maybe they're projecting.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jun 21, 2017 18:45:00 GMT
Ridiculously stupid article making a ridiculously stupid false equivalency. In the guy's own link about "life beginning at conception" all the quotes really says is that an embryo begins at conception, to which every "liberal" would say "duh." None of them say whether or not the very beginning stage of an embryo should count as a human life. In fact, there is no magical moment when an embryo goes from being not-alive to alive. Even outside of embryo development there's no clear-cut distinction between non-living matter and living matter--see the debate over whether viruses are alive. Here's a good article that covers a lot of scientific and religious ground on the notion of when life begins: www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2017/04/when_does_life_begin_outside_the_christian_right_the_answer_is_over_time.html This is not even remotely comparable to Climate Change, where climatologists, the people who are paid to study climate science and spend their entire lives doing it, are overwhelmingly in agreement that it's occurring, and that the consequences can be catastrophic.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jun 21, 2017 18:46:12 GMT
LOL
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2017 18:48:23 GMT
Weird, I care about abortion quite a bit. Guess I must not be a liberal.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 21, 2017 18:49:09 GMT
Case in point....Eva's Bodyguard ignores observable embryology.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 21, 2017 18:51:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Jun 21, 2017 18:51:46 GMT
Case in point....Eva's Bodyguard ignores observable embryology. Observable embryology has nothing to do with anything, moron. Guess Eva's post went over your head, huh? (Not that this is too difficult to do.)
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jun 21, 2017 18:55:37 GMT
Case in point....Eva's Bodyguard ignores observable embryology. Three posts in and you've already lied.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2017 19:03:48 GMT
Ridiculously stupid article making a ridiculously stupid false equivalency. In the guy's own link about "life beginning at conception" all the quotes really says is that an embryo begins at conception, to which every "liberal" would say "duh." The truth that conservatives want to ignore is that life doesn't really "begin" at all. Parents are alive, sperm and eggs are alive, fetuses are alive, etc. One individual emerges from two others, but it is a gradual process with no real defining moment, and life is present throughout. But conservatives don't like how that makes them feel, so they simply deny it. Emotion wins as always.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 21, 2017 19:04:59 GMT
Liberals are hostile to capitalism? You must be joking.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 21, 2017 19:47:36 GMT
The article was quite self deafeating in the first few sentences when he admitted he doesn't know much about climate change (I'm gonna criticize global warming proponents even though I know nothing about it). Seems like something out of Colbert Report. Besides that, abortion is more a ehtical/social debate, global warming is a scientific/economic one, quite dishonest to try to equate the two.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2017 19:54:27 GMT
Here's a better question why do liberals who obsess over science ignore observable embryology? LINK?
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 21, 2017 19:56:42 GMT
Here's a better question why do liberals who obsess over science ignore observable embryology? [and don't tell me you don't ignore it because you do "it's just a clump of cells" "it's not alive" etc. etc.] When they say that, maybe they're projecting. How do you feel about the concept of the quickening?
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Jun 21, 2017 20:32:38 GMT
Lol, lifesitenews. Why not quote the onion next time you stupid fuck?
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Jun 21, 2017 20:33:49 GMT
Liberals are hostile to capitalism? You must be joking. Hey look everyone, paedotroll is trying to be controversial again!
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 21, 2017 20:50:50 GMT
Liberals are hostile to capitalism? You must be joking. Hey look everyone, paedotroll is trying to be controversial again! Nothing controversial about it. This is basic political theory, liberals believe in private property.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jun 21, 2017 20:55:06 GMT
Why care about abortion? Less consumption of resources.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 21, 2017 21:17:44 GMT
Weird. We've talked about abortion a ton over the years.
|
|