|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 22, 2017 9:58:42 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I don't really care so much about round earth/flat earth or young earth/old earth, but I post about it for one reason; because I absolutely hate gangster science and I will do anything I can to oppose the filthy vermin who are constantly shoving it on us. And they are without a doubt vermin, fully deserving of the worst pain that hell has to offer. That's all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2017 10:01:22 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I don't really care so much about round earth/flat earth or young earth/old earth, but I post about it for one reason; because I absolutely hate gangster science and I will do anything I can to oppose the filthy vermin who are constantly shoving it on us. And they are without a doubt vermin, fully deserving of the worst pain that hell has to offer. That's all. It really yanks you chain that there are actual facts, doesn't it?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 22, 2017 10:04:18 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I don't really care so much about round earth/flat earth or young earth/old earth, but I post about it for one reason; because I absolutely hate gangster science and I will do anything I can to oppose the filthy vermin who are constantly shoving it on us. And they are without a doubt vermin, fully deserving of the worst pain that hell has to offer. That's all. It really yanks you chain that there are actual facts, doesn't it? If you have any actual facts, feel free to present them. Aren't you the same antireligious troll who told me that if another celestial object wandered into the solar system it would throw the earth into a longer orbit, thus making the seasons longer and changing the time of the sunset? Or am I confusing you with another antireligious troll?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2017 10:18:47 GMT
It really yanks you chain that there are actual facts, doesn't it? If you have any actual facts, feel free to present them. Planets aren't invisible or magical. There's a couple of facts for ya. Oh, and the Earth is an oblate sphereoid. No, you're confusing me with your own fantasies of what people who disagree with you say because you're not smart enough to remember what we actually said. But do keep trying, there's a good chap.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 10:23:52 GMT
Watched the first two minutes. We trust scientists because it is proven that science works. The Moon landing, Nuclear energy etc are proof of this. I must say though I do agree to a degree with what they are saying. Idiots like Cash say things like "Journal, issue and page number?" Which is obviously an appeal to authority. There are other examples of so called skeptics being seemingly incapable of independent thought. FilmFlaneur and "can something come from nothing"? is another example.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 10:38:58 GMT
Watched the first two minutes. We trust scientists because it is proven that science works. The Moon landing, Nuclear energy etc are proof of this. I must say though I do agree to a degree with what they are saying. Idiots like Cash say things like "Journal, issue and page number?" Which is obviously an appeal to authority. There are other examples of so called skeptics being seemingly incapable of independent thought. FilmFlaneur and "can something come from nothing"? is another example. Being called an idiot by random board imbecile #7 - priceless. Trying to lecture me on logic - good luck with that. Do you even comprehend the purpose of peer review? That was rhetorical. It was obvious by your post that you are completely clueless.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 10:41:20 GMT
Watched the first two minutes. We trust scientists because it is proven that science works. The Moon landing, Nuclear energy etc are proof of this. I must say though I do agree to a degree with what they are saying. Idiots like Cash say things like "Journal, issue and page number?" Which is obviously an appeal to authority. There are other examples of so called skeptics being seemingly incapable of independent thought. FilmFlaneur and "can something come from nothing"? is another example. Being called an idiot by random board imbecile #7 - priceless. Trying to lecture me on logic - good luck with that. Do you even comprehend the purpose of peer review? That was rhetorical. It was obvious by your post that you are completely clueless. Your posts contain nothing a substance. Just insults.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 10:53:24 GMT
Being called an idiot by random board imbecile #7 - priceless. Trying to lecture me on logic - good luck with that. Do you even comprehend the purpose of peer review? That was rhetorical. It was obvious by your post that you are completely clueless. Your posts contain nothing a substance. Just insults. Irony. If I considered you someone worthy of discussion I would post something of substance. As it is, you are simply not up to my level. The truth is you know it. You are demonstrably not an intelligent person and are little more than a troll.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 10:55:43 GMT
Your posts contain nothing a substance. Just insults. Irony. If I considered you someone worthy of discussion I would post something of substance. As it is, you are simply not up to my level. The truth is you know it. You are demonstrably not an intelligent person and are little more than a troll. Can you give an example of a post were actually said something of substance? How am I a troll?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 11:01:55 GMT
Irony. If I considered you someone worthy of discussion I would post something of substance. As it is, you are simply not up to my level. The truth is you know it. You are demonstrably not an intelligent person and are little more than a troll. Can you give an example of a post were actually said something of substance? How am I a troll? On this board? I'm not sure. The level of discussion has decreased tremendously but that began before this board even existed. But ask anyone with integrity and I've posted many times on the old IMDB board about logic, biology and mathematics. Wait, you already know all that, you're just being a time-wasting irritant. I'm also not sure that you recognize those with integrity and those without. You kind of resemble Blade in that respect. Dude, you know you're a troll. Your entire pedophile posting on the old board was a textbook example of trolling.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 11:11:04 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual. My thoughts: I don't really care so much about round earth/flat earth or young earth/old earth, but I post about it for one reason; because I absolutely hate gangster science and I will do anything I can to oppose the filthy vermin who are constantly shoving it on us. And they are without a doubt vermin, fully deserving of the worst pain that hell has to offer. That's all. What you call gangster science is real science conducted by real scientists who then submit their findings to other experts who then do what real scientists do - conduct their own experiments to see if the initial results are repeatable. How you get anything gangster out of that is a question that can only be answered by drunk fools drooling on themselves.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jun 22, 2017 11:29:51 GMT
Next week, we'll show the storks that deliver babies.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 11:31:21 GMT
Can you give an example of a post were actually said something of substance? How am I a troll? On this board? I'm not sure. The level of discussion has decreased tremendously but that began before this board even existed. But ask anyone with integrity and I've posted many times on the old IMDB board about logic, biology and mathematics. Wait, you already know all that, you're just being a time-wasting irritant. I'm also not sure that you recognize those with integrity and those without. You kind of resemble Blade in that respect. Dude, you know you're a troll. Your entire pedophile posting on the old board was a textbook example of trolling. Lol you can't give an example in the last 4 months (this board was created in February) of a substantive post you made? Obviously you are a create contributor to the discussion here.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 11:36:05 GMT
On this board? I'm not sure. The level of discussion has decreased tremendously but that began before this board even existed. But ask anyone with integrity and I've posted many times on the old IMDB board about logic, biology and mathematics. Wait, you already know all that, you're just being a time-wasting irritant. I'm also not sure that you recognize those with integrity and those without. You kind of resemble Blade in that respect. Dude, you know you're a troll. Your entire pedophile posting on the old board was a textbook example of trolling. Lol you can't give an example in the last 4 months (this board was created in February) of a substantive post you made? Obviously you are a create contributor to the discussion here. Can you give an example of a post of substance that you have ever made? Again - rhetorical.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 22, 2017 11:36:38 GMT
There are other examples of so called skeptics being seemingly incapable of independent thought. FilmFlaneur and "can something come from nothing"? is another example. If you are saying that asking such a profound question about the nature of reality does not show independent thought, compared to 'it must have had a deliberate supernatural Cause since that is what has always been taught!' then you ought to explain this. The theoretical science in this area, btw, distinguishes between an absolute 'nothing' (which is not considered to 'exist' anywhere) and an absence which might prove sufficiently provocative given a slight imbalance in reality, which is a different matter entirely.
Incidentally you mention the Appeal To Authority Fallacy. What bigger example of this Fallacy is there than constant appeal to the authority of scripture?
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 11:42:52 GMT
Lol you can't give an example in the last 4 months (this board was created in February) of a substantive post you made? Obviously you are a create contributor to the discussion here. Can you give an example of a post of substance that you have ever made? Again - rhetorical. Just look at my post history.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 22, 2017 11:43:32 GMT
I absolutely hate gangster science and I will do anything I can to oppose the filthy vermin who are constantly shoving it on us. And they are without a doubt vermin, fully deserving of the worst pain that hell has to offer. That's all. www.warrenellis.com/?p=8524 Hey Erjen, going by your words, this is the site for you!
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 11:43:46 GMT
There are other examples of so called skeptics being seemingly incapable of independent thought. FilmFlaneur and "can something come from nothing"? is another example. If you are saying that asking such a profound question about the nature of reality does not show independent thought, compared to 'it must have had a deliberate supernatural Cause since that is what has always been taught!' then you ought to explain this. The theoretical science in this area, btw, distinguishes between an absolute 'nothing' (which is not considered to 'exist' anywhere) and an absence which might prove sufficiently provocative given a slight imbalance in reality, which is a different matter entirely.
Incidentally you mention the Appeal to Authority Fallacy. What bigger example of this fallacy is there than constant appeal to the authority of scripture?
I am an atheist.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 11:43:59 GMT
Can you give an example of a post of substance that you have ever made? Again - rhetorical. Just look at my post history. LOFL.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 22, 2017 11:45:12 GMT
If you are saying that asking such a profound question about the nature of reality does not show independent thought, compared to 'it must have had a deliberate supernatural Cause since that is what has always been taught!' then you ought to explain this. The theoretical science in this area, btw, distinguishes between an absolute 'nothing' (which is not considered to 'exist' anywhere) and an absence which might prove sufficiently provocative given a slight imbalance in reality, which is a different matter entirely.
Incidentally you mention the Appeal to Authority Fallacy. What bigger example of this fallacy is there than constant appeal to the authority of scripture?
I am an atheist. If I ever say you are not, please feel to tell me so again.
|
|