|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 22, 2017 21:34:53 GMT
tpfkar At the very least you lied about your age several times. On the old board you also created socks and used them on threads you started like they were distinct users. At least with that little bit there's no doubt that it's rank dishonesty and not just forehead-smacking witlessness. I believe the irreligious have a moral responsibility not to criticize religion.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 21:40:22 GMT
You didn't debunk anything. You have zero comprehension of analogies. Now you think merely claiming you've done something means you've done it. Just stop, you're not qualified to have a discussion with me, which is probably why you only notice the insults, because it's all you deserve. You're a willing and permanent member of the dunce brigade. Why don't you debunk if then? You never actually presented any counter arguments. You still haven't explained why I would lie or why I couldn't just be misremembering. All you have done is make stupid arguments which I have cal!ed you out on then retreated and claimed a victory.while insulting me. You can claim undemonstrative superiority all you want but all those who don't have a pro-Cash bias (Cinemachinery Edward etc) can see you are being a complete moron. You make a claim, you support the claim. Those are the rules. If you don't like the rules then don't play the game. It is not my responsibility to debunk your claims. It is your responsibility to support them. You've proven you don't understand analogies since you foolishly claimed to debunk a perfectly apt analogy of mine while following it up with a ridiculously inapplicable one of your own. You've made a claim about me that you haven't supported. Either support it or admit you lied. You're not going to get away with the lame excuses you keep making nor with trying to shift the burden of proof. After we deal with your claims then we can deal with whatever claim of mine you think is unsupported. When you show even the slightest bit of integrity then I might consider you worthy of more than insults and ridicule. But so far you've done nothing but strengthen the idea that you are on the level of Blade and Erjen.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 21:41:20 GMT
tpfkar At the very least you lied about your age several times. On the old board you also created socks and used them on threads you started like they were distinct users. At least with that little bit there's no doubt that it's rank dishonesty and not just forehead-smacking witlessness. I believe the irreligious have a moral responsibility not to criticize religion.I gave false ages over the years yes but only to protect my anonymity. I did the se one thing yes but only so retards like yourself would stop posting trollery in my threads. I have only trolled once or twice.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 21:42:01 GMT
Fuck off, you impotent, lying, shit-stirring, uneducated simpleton. Not a single person believes you. Everybody can see the bullshit you've posted and you are well known as a lying fuckwit. Well, Erjen will say he believes you but Erjen thinks scientists are withholding the truth about a rogue planet and he isn't sure whether or not water should be banned. Cash caught being dishonest for the umpteenth time, is once again reduced to childish insults. Stop being a liar and a hypocrite and I'll stop calling you out on it, bitch. Neither you nor anybody else has ever caught me being dishonest. Your horrible grasp on communication is your own handicap so stop trying to pass it off on me, simpleton.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 21:48:29 GMT
Why don't you debunk if then? You never actually presented any counter arguments. You still haven't explained why I would lie or why I couldn't just be misremembering. All you have done is make stupid arguments which I have cal!ed you out on then retreated and claimed a victory.while insulting me. You can claim undemonstrative superiority all you want but all those who don't have a pro-Cash bias (Cinemachinery Edward etc) can see you are being a complete moron. You make a claim, you support the claim. Those are the rules. If you don't like the rules then don't play the game. It is not my responsibility to debunk your claims. It is your responsibility to support them. You've proven you don't understand analogies since you foolishly claimed to debunk a perfectly apt analogy of mine while following it up with a ridiculously inapplicable one of your own. You've made a claim about me that you haven't supported. Either support it or admit you lied. You're not going to get away with the lame excuses you keep making nor with trying to shift the burden of proof. After we deal with your claims then we can deal with whatever claim of mine you think is unsupported. When you show even the slightest bit of integrity then I might consider you worthy of more than insults and ridicule. But so far you've done nothing but strengthen the idea that you are on the level of Blade and Erjen. You gave an analogy, I responded with how outlandish the example was (raping animals) and you just said I didn't understand analogies and nothing else. I will post my cohnter arguments again. -Raping animals is extremely uncommon -No one would admit to raping an animal on a message board like IMDB. -You would be able to give an example of me saying I raped animals, that is not something you would forget. You still have yet to answer the following questions about me lieing -Why would I lie? -Why mightn't I just be misremembering? So what happened to me not being qualified to have a discussion with you?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 22, 2017 21:51:51 GMT
Cash caught being dishonest for the umpteenth time, is once again reduced to childish insults. Stop being a liar and a hypocrite and I'll stop calling you out on it, bitch. Neither you nor anybody else has ever caught me being dishonest. Your horrible grasp on communication is your own handicap so stop trying to pass it off on me, simpleton. You lied about me multiple times in another thread and didn't even attempt to back up a single one of your lies. Then you told another member to back up some "lies" he told about you on a public board where everyone can see you doing it sht for brains. This makes you a blatant hypocrite and a liar. I can't be the dumbest person in the world when you just painted yourself into a corner for the second time today.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 22, 2017 22:01:26 GMT
tpfkar You of course lie again here. You gave false ages so that you could appear to be close in age to juveniles when you were supporting adults having sex with kids. And characterizing having conversations with yourself supporting your "positions" within your own threads as fighting nonexistent "trollery" is just par for the halfwit course for you. As for trolling, what do you call sexually explicit come ons PMs to somebody you're arguing with in a thread? Or even just open in threads? I see you edited "I have never trolled." to "I have only trolled once or twice." I believe the irreligious have a moral responsibility not to criticize religion.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 22:07:23 GMT
You make a claim, you support the claim. Those are the rules. If you don't like the rules then don't play the game. It is not my responsibility to debunk your claims. It is your responsibility to support them. You've proven you don't understand analogies since you foolishly claimed to debunk a perfectly apt analogy of mine while following it up with a ridiculously inapplicable one of your own. You've made a claim about me that you haven't supported. Either support it or admit you lied. You're not going to get away with the lame excuses you keep making nor with trying to shift the burden of proof. After we deal with your claims then we can deal with whatever claim of mine you think is unsupported. When you show even the slightest bit of integrity then I might consider you worthy of more than insults and ridicule. But so far you've done nothing but strengthen the idea that you are on the level of Blade and Erjen. You gave an analogy, I responded with how outlandish the example was (raping animals) and you just said I didn't understand analogies and nothing else. I will post my cohnter arguments again. -Raping animals is extremely uncommon -No one would admit to raping an animal on a message board like IMDB. -You would be able to give an example of me saying I raped animals, that is not something you would forget. You still have yet to answer the following questions about me lieing -Why would I lie? -Why mightn't I just be misremembering? So what happened to me not being someone worthy of discussion with? Not one of the three things you listed is relevant to the point of an analogy. You said: "I cant think of any examples of you doing that (ignoring legitimate criticism of scientific theories), but that doesn't mean I was wrong. " To which I replied: "I can't think of any examples of you admitting to raping farm animals, but that doesn't mean you haven't admitted to raping farm animals. " Those are equivalent statements for the purpose of an analogy. There is nothing present in one statement for which there is not a logically equivalent part in the other statement. Now for your attempt. I said: "Why the fuck are you asking me to explain a liar's motives for lying? " To which you said: "Person A: Obama wants to turn all the frogs gay, he is lieing about chemtrails Person B: What motive would he have to turn the frogs gay? Person A: Why the fuck are you asking me that? The problem is you specifically asked me why you would lie after lying. If you "misremembered" then you still lied because you posted something as fact without being able, by your own admission, to establish such a fact. My claim that you lied is supported by your own weasel words. There is no support for the claim that Obama wants to turn frogs gay. Also, there is nothing in my statement that is equivalent to the chemtrails part of your attempted analogy. I can't even believe I'm in the position of needing to explain this to you. Again, I don't know why you would lie, but the fact is you lied. It remains a lie by your refusal to retract the claim rather than making a lame excuse and saying that just because you can't support the claim doesn't mean it isn't true. So here's your chance, again. Do you retract the false claim about things I've said?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 22:11:46 GMT
Neither you nor anybody else has ever caught me being dishonest. Your horrible grasp on communication is your own handicap so stop trying to pass it off on me, simpleton. You lied about me multiple times in another thread and didn't even attempt to back up a single one of your lies. Then you told another member to back up some "lies" he told about you on a public board where everyone can see you doing it sht for brains. This makes you a blatant hypocrite and a liar. I can't be the dumbest person in the world when you just painted yourself into a corner for the second time today. I did not tell a single lie about you, King of the Virgins, and yes you are the dumbest person, not just on the planet and alive today but absolutely the stupidest person who has ever lived. Everything I said about you was true up until the point I just started ridiculing you because I was having fun watching you go full Bladetard. Here's a good rule of thumb to live by - Never be you.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 22:12:55 GMT
tpfkar You of course lie again here. You gave false ages so that you could appear to be close in age to juveniles when you were supporting adults having sex with kids. And characterizing having conversations with yourself supporting your "positions" within your own threads as fighting nonexistent "trollery" is just par for the halfwit course for you. As for trolling, what do you call sexually explicit come ons PMs to somebody you're arguing with in a thread? Or even just open in threads? I see you edited "I have never trolled." to "I have only trolled once or twice." I believe the irreligious have a moral responsibility not to criticize religion.Next it will be "I only troll when I'm bored."
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 22, 2017 22:14:23 GMT
You lied about me multiple times in another thread and didn't even attempt to back up a single one of your lies. Then you told another member to back up some "lies" he told about you on a public board where everyone can see you doing it sht for brains. This makes you a blatant hypocrite and a liar. I can't be the dumbest person in the world when you just painted yourself into a corner for the second time today. I did not tell a single lie about you, King of the Virgins, and yes you are the dumbest person, not just on the planet and alive today but absolutely the stupidest person who has ever lived. Everything I said about you was true up until the point I just started ridiculing you because I was having fun watching you go full Bladetard. Here's a good rule of thumb to live by - Never be you. Another lie. Back up your lies or retract them.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 22:23:00 GMT
tpfkar You of course lie again here. You gave false ages so that you could appear to be close in age to juveniles when you were supporting adults having sex with kids. And characterizing having conversations with yourself supporting your "positions" within your own threads as fighting nonexistent "trollery" is just par for the halfwit course for you. As for trolling, what do you call sexually explicit come ons PMs to somebody you're arguing with in a thread? Or even just open in threads? I see you edited "I have never trolled." to "I have only trolled once or twice." I believe the irreligious have a moral responsibility not to criticize religion.I claimed to be fourteen, I was obviously not serious in this case. Poe's law applies here.c also not sure if that falls under the category ot trolling. I replied to one of my posts to try and make it look legitimate. What "sexually explicit" PMs?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 22:25:19 GMT
I did not tell a single lie about you, King of the Virgins, and yes you are the dumbest person, not just on the planet and alive today but absolutely the stupidest person who has ever lived. Everything I said about you was true up until the point I just started ridiculing you because I was having fun watching you go full Bladetard. Here's a good rule of thumb to live by - Never be you. Another lie. Back up your lies or retract them. There are no lies to back up. Are you still going to lie about saying the official Vatican website is not a legitimate Catholic source? You've been lying about that one for a few years now when multiple people, including me, ridiculed the fuck out of you when you first said it. Or are you going to claim I lied when I said you were a virgin who has never seen a naked woman? Idiot, your own interactions with women on the boards show you are completely clueless about anything concerning women and you always come across as a creepy loser stalker the way you did with Monica. Or are you going to repeat your lie about having a daughter when it was obvious you just made that up because of your near constant and creepy stalking of gadreel concerning his daughter? Or are you going to lie about still living with your parents even after it was shown that you and they have the same fucking address? It is of course theoretically possible that the last one has changed since that fact was revealed. But since it was true at the time it would now be your responsibility to prove that the situation has changed and it still would not be a lie since the available information showed it to be true and you have taken no action to show any such change. Now would you kindly fuck off and go stalk somebody else for awhile, just not Monica because I believe you genuinely creep her the fuck out.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 22:26:47 GMT
tpfkar You of course lie again here. You gave false ages so that you could appear to be close in age to juveniles when you were supporting adults having sex with kids. And characterizing having conversations with yourself supporting your "positions" within your own threads as fighting nonexistent "trollery" is just par for the halfwit course for you. As for trolling, what do you call sexually explicit come ons PMs to somebody you're arguing with in a thread? Or even just open in threads? I see you edited "I have never trolled." to "I have only trolled once or twice." I believe the irreligious have a moral responsibility not to criticize religion.I claimed to be fourteen, I was obviously not serious in this case. Poe's law applies here.c also not sure if that falls under the category ot trolling. I replied to one of my posts to try and make it look legitimate. What "sexually explicit" PMs? So you admit to being dishonest, therefore lying. Okay then. I'm glad that's settled.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 22:28:09 GMT
You gave an analogy, I responded with how outlandish the example was (raping animals) and you just said I didn't understand analogies and nothing else. I will post my cohnter arguments again. -Raping animals is extremely uncommon -No one would admit to raping an animal on a message board like IMDB. -You would be able to give an example of me saying I raped animals, that is not something you would forget. You still have yet to answer the following questions about me lieing -Why would I lie? -Why mightn't I just be misremembering? So what happened to me not being someone worthy of discussion with? Not one of the three things you listed is relevant to the point of an analogy. You said: "I cant think of any examples of you doing that (ignoring legitimate criticism of scientific theories), but that doesn't mean I was wrong. " To which I replied: "I can't think of any examples of you admitting to raping farm animals, but that doesn't mean you haven't admitted to raping farm animals. " Those are equivalent statements for the purpose of an analogy. There is nothing present in one statement for which there is not a logically equivalent part in the other statement. Now for your attempt. I said: "Why the fuck are you asking me to explain a liar's motives for lying? " To which you said: "Person A: Obama wants to turn all the frogs gay, he is lieing about chemtrails Person B: What motive would he have to turn the frogs gay? Person A: Why the fuck are you asking me that? The problem is you specifically asked me why you would lie after lying. If you "misremembered" then you still lied because you posted something as fact without being able, by your own admission, to establish such a fact. My claim that you lied is supported by your own weasel words. There is no support for the claim that Obama wants to turn frogs gay. Also, there is nothing in my statement that is equivalent to the chemtrails part of your attempted analogy. I can't even believe I'm in the position of needing to explain this to you. Again, I don't know why you would lie, but the fact is you lied. It remains a lie by your refusal to retract the claim rather than making a lame excuse and saying that just because you can't support the claim doesn't mean it isn't true. So here's your chance, again. Do you retract the false claim about things I've said? One claim (argument from authority fallacy) is far more plausible then the other (raping animals) so how is it a "gotcha"! moment? How does this analogy prove what I said is ridiculous? One thing at a time I will respond to this rest after this is settled.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 22, 2017 22:29:58 GMT
Another lie. Back up your lies or retract them. There are no lies to back up. Are you still going to lie about saying the official Vatican website is not a legitimate Catholic source? You've been lying about that one for a few years now when multiple people, including me, ridiculed the fuck out of you when you first said it. Or are you going to claim I lied when I said you were a virgin who has never seen a naked woman? Idiot, your own interactions with women on the boards show you are completely clueless about anything concerning women and you always come across as a creepy loser stalker the way you did with Monica. Or are you going to repeat your lie about having a daughter when it was obvious you just made that up because of your near constant and creepy stalking of gadreel concerning his daughter? Or are you going to lie about still living with your parents even after it was shown that you and they have the same fucking address? It is of course theoretically possible that the last one has changed since that fact was revealed. But since it was true at the time it would now be your responsibility to prove that the situation has changed and it still would not be a lie since the available information showed it to be true and you have taken no action to show any such change. Now would you kindly fuck off and go stalk somebody else for awhile, just not Monica because I believe you genuinely creep her the fuck out. I'm waiting for you to back up you lies or retract them. Dont even think you can get away with telling lies about me and then pretend like it never happened. Back up your lies or retract them. You talk about integrity but you have none. Now back up your lies or retract them.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 22, 2017 22:32:21 GMT
tpfkar Sure, you can rationalize anything. That wasn't trolling, that was just full-on deceit. You replied multiple times until it was pointed out, then the logins just silently never returned. Old board. Why didn't you ask about the sexually explicit come-ons in threads? I believe the irreligious have a moral responsibility not to criticize religion.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 22, 2017 22:33:05 GMT
I claimed to be fourteen, I was obviously not serious in this case. Poe's law applies here.c also not sure if that falls under the category ot trolling. I replied to one of my posts to try and make it look legitimate. What "sexually explicit" PMs? So you admit to being dishonest, therefore lying. Okay then. I'm glad that's settled. In the second case sure. But my motives were to avoid being faced with trollery. Not lieing fir me own amusement.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 22:33:38 GMT
Not one of the three things you listed is relevant to the point of an analogy. You said: "I cant think of any examples of you doing that (ignoring legitimate criticism of scientific theories), but that doesn't mean I was wrong. " To which I replied: "I can't think of any examples of you admitting to raping farm animals, but that doesn't mean you haven't admitted to raping farm animals. " Those are equivalent statements for the purpose of an analogy. There is nothing present in one statement for which there is not a logically equivalent part in the other statement. Now for your attempt. I said: "Why the fuck are you asking me to explain a liar's motives for lying? " To which you said: "Person A: Obama wants to turn all the frogs gay, he is lieing about chemtrails Person B: What motive would he have to turn the frogs gay? Person A: Why the fuck are you asking me that? The problem is you specifically asked me why you would lie after lying. If you "misremembered" then you still lied because you posted something as fact without being able, by your own admission, to establish such a fact. My claim that you lied is supported by your own weasel words. There is no support for the claim that Obama wants to turn frogs gay. Also, there is nothing in my statement that is equivalent to the chemtrails part of your attempted analogy. I can't even believe I'm in the position of needing to explain this to you. Again, I don't know why you would lie, but the fact is you lied. It remains a lie by your refusal to retract the claim rather than making a lame excuse and saying that just because you can't support the claim doesn't mean it isn't true. So here's your chance, again. Do you retract the false claim about things I've said? One claim (argument from authority fallacy) is far more plausible then the other (raping animals) so how is it a "gotcha"! moment? How does this analogy prove what I said is ridiculous? One thing at a time I will respond to this rest after this is settled. Stop being a time-wasting little shit, Blade Junior. I've answerd your fucking questions even though i was under no obligation to do so so stop imitating the Dunce King by just muddying the waters with even more inane questions and either support your claim or retract it.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 22, 2017 22:35:22 GMT
There are no lies to back up. Are you still going to lie about saying the official Vatican website is not a legitimate Catholic source? You've been lying about that one for a few years now when multiple people, including me, ridiculed the fuck out of you when you first said it. Or are you going to claim I lied when I said you were a virgin who has never seen a naked woman? Idiot, your own interactions with women on the boards show you are completely clueless about anything concerning women and you always come across as a creepy loser stalker the way you did with Monica. Or are you going to repeat your lie about having a daughter when it was obvious you just made that up because of your near constant and creepy stalking of gadreel concerning his daughter? Or are you going to lie about still living with your parents even after it was shown that you and they have the same fucking address? It is of course theoretically possible that the last one has changed since that fact was revealed. But since it was true at the time it would now be your responsibility to prove that the situation has changed and it still would not be a lie since the available information showed it to be true and you have taken no action to show any such change. Now would you kindly fuck off and go stalk somebody else for awhile, just not Monica because I believe you genuinely creep her the fuck out. I'm waiting for you to back up you lies or retract them. Dont even think you can get away with telling lies about me and then pretend like it never happened. Back up your lies or retract them. You talk about integrity but you have none. Now back up your lies or retract them. Goddamn you're a fucking imbecile.
|
|