|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 24, 2017 23:13:05 GMT
Enjoy. After I first began using the term on the old IMDb, Arlon10 asked if it would be all right if he used it too. And I said to him please do use it. I want it to be used. I meant for it to be used. Even Cash used it recently, and perhaps now he is realizing just how badly it backfired on him. This blind faith in what passes for science now isn't just limited to climate change. It can be about abortion, evolution, and any number of issues.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 23:17:02 GMT
Enjoy. After I first began using the term on the old IMDb, Arlon10 asked if it would be all right if he used it too. And I said to him please do use it. I want it to be used. I meant for it to be used. Even Cash used it recently, and perhaps now he is realizing just how badly it backfired on him. Yeah, I'm sure that happened somewhere among all the other delusions in your head.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 24, 2017 23:21:32 GMT
Enjoy. After I first began using the term on the old IMDb, Arlon10 asked if it would be all right if he used it too. And I said to him please do use it. I want it to be used. I meant for it to be used. Even Cash used it recently, and perhaps now he is realizing just how badly it backfired on him. Yeah, I'm sure that happened somewhere among all the other delusions in your head. How admirable that you're trying to handle this on your own, but face it. You need help. You need Cine and the rest of the Peanut Gallery to prop you up.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 24, 2017 23:24:14 GMT
Mandela Effect
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 23:24:40 GMT
Yeah, I'm sure that happened somewhere among all the other delusions in your head. How admirable that you're trying to handle this on your own, but face it. You need help. You need Cine and the rest of the Peanut Gallery to prop you up. Against you? Erjen, you're an uneducated simpleton. You are the second stupidest person on the planet. You'd lose arguments to coma patients but be too delusional to realize you lost.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 24, 2017 23:28:21 GMT
How admirable that you're trying to handle this on your own, but face it. You need help. You need Cine and the rest of the Peanut Gallery to prop you up. Against you? Erjen, you're an uneducated simpleton. You are the second stupidest person on the planet. You'd lose arguments to coma patients but be too delusional to realize you lost. "You are the second stupidest person on the planet." Whose first? I'm assuming it's either Blade or Ada.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 23:31:19 GMT
Against you? Erjen, you're an uneducated simpleton. You are the second stupidest person on the planet. You'd lose arguments to coma patients but be too delusional to realize you lost. "You are the second stupidest person on the planet." Whose first? I'm assuming it's either Blade or Ada. Definitely Blade. Erjen, once in a blue moon, actually manages to say something that isn't boneheaded stupid.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 24, 2017 23:32:21 GMT
How admirable that you're trying to handle this on your own, but face it. You need help. You need Cine and the rest of the Peanut Gallery to prop you up. Against you? Erjen, you're an uneducated simpleton. You are the second stupidest person on the planet. You'd lose arguments to coma patients but be too delusional to realize you lost. The second stupidest, with blade being the first, right? Wow. What a bummer. Looks as if I'm going to have to work even harder to earn your disrespect.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 25, 2017 0:15:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 25, 2017 0:30:06 GMT
Do you mean "gangster science"? I don't recall asking to use that term, but now that you mention it, it has potential.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 25, 2017 0:39:40 GMT
Do you mean "gangster science"? I don't recall asking to use that term, but now that you mention it, it has potential. Thanks. It's sad, but science is for sale in this day and age. If you have the bankroll to hire people with science degrees, you can get them to concur that the world is flat, or round, or a cubical, or Hostess Twinkie shape, or whatever you want it to be.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Jun 25, 2017 0:50:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 25, 2017 0:56:52 GMT
Yahtzee!
I've been labeled an anti-vaxxer, but my problem isn't really with the vaccines. It's with the crap they're putting in with the vaccines.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jun 25, 2017 1:02:39 GMT
Do you mean "gangster science"? I don't recall asking to use that term, but now that you mention it, it has potential. If you have the bankroll to hire people with science degrees, you can get them to concur that the world is flat, or round, or a cubical, or Hostess Twinkie shape, or whatever you want it to be. Unless you're the Koch brothers apparently, and then you can hire a climate change skeptic to do a study disproving climate change only to have the skeptic produce the opposite and change his mind on the matter.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 25, 2017 1:08:20 GMT
Do you mean "gangster science"? I don't recall asking to use that term, but now that you mention it, it has potential. Thanks. It's sad, but science is for sale in this day and age. If you have the bankroll to hire people with science degrees, you can get them to concur that the world is flat, or round, or a cubical, or Hostess Twinkie shape, or whatever you want it to be. I was disappointed when you chose to air flat Earth "arguments." With your other challenges to popular notions of science there is at least a grain of substance. Science generally needs challenging, but it ought to be high quality. Speaking of terms, "gangster science" might help, but if the term alone could help then "Paley's watch" would have solved a lot of problems years ago. Sometimes it's the term the opposition depends on that needs addressing and perhaps attack, like the term "random." I think we need to go for that jugular.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 25, 2017 1:15:05 GMT
Thanks. It's sad, but science is for sale in this day and age. If you have the bankroll to hire people with science degrees, you can get them to concur that the world is flat, or round, or a cubical, or Hostess Twinkie shape, or whatever you want it to be. I was disappointed when you chose to air flat Earth "arguments." With your other challenges to popular notions of science there is at least a grain of substance. Science generally needs challenging, but it ought to be high quality. Speaking of terms, "gangster science" might help, but if the term alone could help then "Paley's watch" would have solved a lot of problems years ago. Sometimes it's the term the opposition depends on that needs addressing and perhaps attack, like the term "random." I think we need to go for that jugular. Sorry to disappoint you, but if it aggravates the ungodly, I'm going to do it. On your second point I am more in agreement.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 25, 2017 1:17:49 GMT
I was disappointed when you chose to air flat Earth "arguments." With your other challenges to popular notions of science there is at least a grain of substance. Science generally needs challenging, but it ought to be high quality. Speaking of terms, "gangster science" might help, but if the term alone could help then "Paley's watch" would have solved a lot of problems years ago. Sometimes it's the term the opposition depends on that needs addressing and perhaps attack, like the term "random." I think we need to go for that jugular. Sorry to disappoint you, but if it aggravates the ungodly, I'm going to do it. On your second point I am more in agreement. People who accept elementary school science are "ungodly"?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 25, 2017 1:28:29 GMT
Sorry to disappoint you, but if it aggravates the ungodly, I'm going to do it. On your second point I am more in agreement. People who accept elementary school science are "ungodly"? You mean elementary school science like Java Man? nwcreation.net/evolutionfraud.html
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 25, 2017 1:39:54 GMT
I'm really not sure what you're hoping to prove with a poorly made Creationist article. Do you believe people accept the earth is round are "ungodly"?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 25, 2017 1:46:20 GMT
I'm really not sure what you're hoping to prove with a poorly made Creationist article. Do you believe people accept the earth is round are "ungodly"? No, not at all. I've been collating for some time now, and I think the earth must have some curvature.
|
|