|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 29, 2017 17:16:04 GMT
Guess what, films copy or are influenced by other films all the time, not just in the superhero genre. So what if Civil War decided to add Black Panther when BvS decided to put Wonder Woman in their film. Take a guess which one was more successful. And for the record, Guardians of the Galaxy has five major characters, not a single solo film for either of them, now one of the greatest comic book movie ever. And that came out in 2014, way before BvS. Either way, it doesn't matter who copies who. It's just how it's executed, and so far, Marvel is doing a better job of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 29, 2017 17:32:14 GMT
So what if Civil War decided to add Black Panther when BvS decided to put Wonder Woman in their film. Take a guess which one was more successful. And Wonder Woman is more successful than Captain America: The First AvengerIt's just how it's executed, and so far, Marvel is doing a better job of it.
And Wonder Woman did a better job of portraying the horror and brutality of war than Captain America: The First Avenger. Wonder Woman also did a better job of finding the right balance between the lighter moments and the more serious moments than MCU, which still hasn't figured out how to do that right after 15 movies.
And the "who copied who" question has been ended. MCU dictator Kevin Feige has already admitted that MCU copied the blueprint for most of their movies from Superman: The Movie. That came from MCU dictator Kevin Feige's own mouth so it's hard for you MCU fans to argue against that when you own dictator has admitted to that. |
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Jun 29, 2017 17:34:25 GMT
They're all just copying whats already been done in print for decades anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 29, 2017 17:39:56 GMT
So what if Civil War decided to add Black Panther when BvS decided to put Wonder Woman in their film. Take a guess which one was more successful. And Wonder Woman is more successful than Captain America: The First AvengerIt's just how it's executed, and so far, Marvel is doing a better job of it.
And Wonder Woman did a better job of portraying the horror and brutality of war than Captain America: The First Avenger. Wonder Woman also did a better job of finding the right balance between the lighter moments and the more serious moments than MCU, which still hasn't figured out how to do that right after 15 movies.
And the "who copied who" question has been ended. MCU dictator Kevin Feige has already admitted that MCU copied the blueprint for most of their movies from Superman: The Movie. That came from MCU dictator Kevin Feige's own mouth so it's hard for you MCU fans to argue against that when you own dictator has admitted to that. Great, yet Civil War is miles better than BvS, and the reviews confirms it. And that makes you upset and you can't seem to get over that. And as usual, you seem to have ignore what I said about Guardians of the Galaxy because you know I'm right there as well. And there's nothing wrong with Wonder Woman being good! I think it's better than some Marvel films, but not all. And most agree on here. Meanwhile, being a prententious little bitch like you always are, you sit on your high horse like Wonder Woman is the next Godfather film or something just because it has a high RottenTomatos score, something you claim is irrelevant unless it fits your agenda. I know you'll never admit to that, but everyone on here knows that's what you do. |
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jun 30, 2017 5:38:01 GMT
Great...we have another radical.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 1, 2017 1:03:07 GMT
Great...we have another radical.  . |
|
