flyerzzrul
Sophomore
@flyerzzrul
Posts: 856
Likes: 534
|
Post by flyerzzrul on Jul 4, 2017 18:07:52 GMT
Ric Flair is the only 2 time member (singles and horseman) but I think Edge deserves the same honor as Edge and Christian should be in as a tag-team.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2017 4:16:59 GMT
Since WWE opened the door with inducting stables then there are a few people who should be multiple entrants.
Shawn Michaels 3x (Solo, Rockers, DX) HHH 3x (Solo, DX, Evolution) which would give Flair 3 as well Edge 2x (Solo and E&C) Scott Hall 2x (Solo and NWO) Kevin Nash 2x (Solo and NWO) Hulk Hogan 2x (Solo and NWO) Bret Hart 2x (Solo and Hart Foundation)
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jul 5, 2017 8:20:21 GMT
I want to know when the WWE is planning to put Chyna, CM Punk, and AJ Lee into the "WWE HALL OF FAME".
|
|
flyerzzrul
Sophomore
@flyerzzrul
Posts: 856
Likes: 534
|
Post by flyerzzrul on Jul 5, 2017 17:07:08 GMT
Since WWE opened the door with inducting stables then there are a few people who should be multiple entrants. Shawn Michaels 3x (Solo, Rockers, DX) HHH 3x (Solo, DX, Evolution) which would give Flair 3 as well Edge 2x (Solo and E&C) Scott Hall 2x (Solo and NWO) Kevin Nash 2x (Solo and NWO) Hulk Hogan 2x (Solo and NWO) Bret Hart 2x (Solo and Hart Foundation) I forgot about the Hart Foundation, good call but I don't think the Rockers belong. and the stables would just be too much.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2017 9:12:40 GMT
Since WWE opened the door with inducting stables then there are a few people who should be multiple entrants. Shawn Michaels 3x (Solo, Rockers, DX) HHH 3x (Solo, DX, Evolution) which would give Flair 3 as well Edge 2x (Solo and E&C) Scott Hall 2x (Solo and NWO) Kevin Nash 2x (Solo and NWO) Hulk Hogan 2x (Solo and NWO) Bret Hart 2x (Solo and Hart Foundation) I forgot about the Hart Foundation, good call but I don't think the Rockers belong. and the stables would just be too much. I disagree with The Rockers. They are looked at very highly within the industry and are considered revolutionary in the WWF at that time. I've heard people say that without teams like The Rockers we wouldn't have teams like The Hardy Boyz today. WWE has opened up the stable thing by inducting the 4 Horseman so it's only a matter of time until NWO, DX, and Evolution get inducted.
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on Jul 6, 2017 19:30:46 GMT
I forgot about the Hart Foundation, good call but I don't think the Rockers belong. and the stables would just be too much. I disagree with The Rockers. They are looked at very highly within the industry and are considered revolutionary in the WWF at that time. I've heard people say that without teams like The Rockers we wouldn't have teams like The Hardy Boyz today. WWE has opened up the stable thing by inducting the 4 Horseman so it's only a matter of time until NWO, DX, and Evolution get inducted. I'm not sure about the Rockers. You could say there'd be no rockers without the fabs or the rock n' rolls. They were a direct knockoff of those teams.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2017 6:50:56 GMT
I disagree with The Rockers. They are looked at very highly within the industry and are considered revolutionary in the WWF at that time. I've heard people say that without teams like The Rockers we wouldn't have teams like The Hardy Boyz today. WWE has opened up the stable thing by inducting the 4 Horseman so it's only a matter of time until NWO, DX, and Evolution get inducted. I'm not sure about the Rockers. You could say there'd be no rockers without the fabs or the rock n' rolls. They were a direct knockoff of those teams. I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying in terms of how they're looked at within the industry/WWE they're viewed as a very revolutionary tag team. Which in this case would very likely earn them a spot in WWE's HOF. Just because they never technically held the Tag Team titles won't hurt them either. Hell Jake Roberts got inducted and he never held a title either. So I really see no reason as to why WWE wouldn't induct them. You can disagree on whether they deserve it or not which is fine. It's not like all the people in the HOF are deserving of it anyways so would The Rockers really be that undeserving given others that have made it in?
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Jul 7, 2017 13:26:38 GMT
Since WWE opened the door with inducting stables then there are a few people who should be multiple entrants. Shawn Michaels 3x (Solo, Rockers, DX) HHH 3x (Solo, DX, Evolution) which would give Flair 3 as well Edge 2x (Solo and E&C) Scott Hall 2x (Solo and NWO) Kevin Nash 2x (Solo and NWO) Hulk Hogan 2x (Solo and NWO) Bret Hart 2x (Solo and Hart Foundation) I forgot about the Hart Foundation, good call but I don't think the Rockers belong. and the stables would just be too much. I see no reason not to include stables. Stables have been just as influential and revolutionary as singles competitors.
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on Jul 7, 2017 20:46:26 GMT
I'm not sure about the Rockers. You could say there'd be no rockers without the fabs or the rock n' rolls. They were a direct knockoff of those teams. I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying in terms of how they're looked at within the industry/WWE they're viewed as a very revolutionary tag team. Which in this case would very likely earn them a spot in WWE's HOF. Just because they never technically held the Tag Team titles won't hurt them either. Hell Jake Roberts got inducted and he never held a title either. So I really see no reason as to why WWE wouldn't induct them. You can disagree on whether they deserve it or not which is fine. It's not like all the people in the HOF are deserving of it anyways so would The Rockers really be that undeserving given others that have made it in? Yeah sure they probably deserve to be in there. I don't see why not. I just mean that I see the Rock n' rolls as more of a revolutionary team because they were doing that same style years before the rockers. But the Rockers were a hell of a team as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2017 0:53:29 GMT
I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying in terms of how they're looked at within the industry/WWE they're viewed as a very revolutionary tag team. Which in this case would very likely earn them a spot in WWE's HOF. Just because they never technically held the Tag Team titles won't hurt them either. Hell Jake Roberts got inducted and he never held a title either. So I really see no reason as to why WWE wouldn't induct them. You can disagree on whether they deserve it or not which is fine. It's not like all the people in the HOF are deserving of it anyways so would The Rockers really be that undeserving given others that have made it in? Yeah sure they probably deserve to be in there. I don't see why not. I just mean that I see the Rock n' rolls as more of a revolutionary team because they were doing that same style years before the rockers. But the Rockers were a hell of a team as well. I agree with you entirely. I'm not saying I'd put them in but we're living in a world where Koko B Ware is a HOF'er so if he's deserving then The Rockers sure are. For me it's just a matter of time before WWE starts doing tag teams and I'm sure they'd be one that WWE would induct. I now wonder who would induct them?
|
|
|
Post by Jayman on Jul 8, 2017 1:08:56 GMT
To be honest I haven't been keeping up with any of the hall of fame stuff. I can't think of anybody that's relevant to the team that would induct them.
|
|
tresix
Sophomore
@tresix
Posts: 495
Likes: 201
|
Post by tresix on Aug 9, 2017 2:23:38 GMT
I want to know when the WWE is planning to put Chyna, CM Punk, and AJ Lee into the " WWE HALL OF FAME". As much as I like them, do you really think Punk and Lee are at HOF level yet?
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Aug 15, 2017 13:20:32 GMT
Punk certainly. Guy changed a lot of things and opened doors for "Indy" guys to be able to get ahead.
AJ, not so much. I loved her rivalry with Kaitlyn though.
|
|