|
Post by BATouttaheck on Jul 16, 2017 1:03:49 GMT
naterdawgHe's followed me all around this place, and not just on this thread. Odd how you are so often "followed" by someone who is active in a thread before you. Suggest that you go and watch a movie about a movie being made or a movies that includes someone watching a movie and cool off, Dude. Meanwhile, mind if we keep trying to make something of this thread (with or without you !) ? Oh. Have a Nice Day !
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Jul 16, 2017 1:08:25 GMT
That seems rather harsh, given the ambiguity of your OP. The phrase "movies within movies" suggests those (fictional or otherwise) actually seen within a film to as many as it does those being made within it. We had a thread here some weeks back that was more specific, focusing on films about film making, which is what you now seem to be looking for. Citing Singin' In the Rain doesn't narrow it down, because it features both. I'm among those to whom the phrase "movies within movies" (or film-within-a-film) means one seen rather than one being made. As such, I was the first to break your previously unstated rule ("That doesn't encompass films with filmclips from real movies"), for which I apologize if it upset you. It was done from that different understanding of the given criterion. If you wish a thread to adhere to a more rigid one, greater specificity would help (more so than calling people "dickhead"). Just the same, it's the nature of forums such as this that once a thread is started, its creator loses control of it (unless it's one involving scoring, like a GarthGame) and it will go where others choose to take it. I consider that a feature rather than a bug, but there's really nothing that can be done about it either way. These are the helpfully-intended observations from the "Dog" to the "dawg." Well, you're wrong, ok? Thanks. I'm afraid that without that specificity I suggested, your message is again ambiguous. But thank you anyway.
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Jul 16, 2017 1:34:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by naterdawg on Jul 16, 2017 1:36:35 GMT
You tire me. Goodbye.
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Jul 16, 2017 1:38:21 GMT
The Last Horror Film (1982)
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Jul 16, 2017 1:58:36 GMT
I'm no longer sure, what with all this uncertainty over that about which one may or may not be wrong with which one is left, rightly or wrongly. Right?
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Jul 16, 2017 2:09:04 GMT
Doghouse6I would have to agree with that last statement at least 100%. .... But it looks like poor dawg has called it quits. Seems he was suddenly quite tired ! Probably going to rail at someone for liking The Middle ! (or for breathing ! ) .... But: Back on TOPIC (if that's possible)... ever see The Player ? It's chock-a-block full of cameos and is really a good film even if you don't know all the folks wandering around in it. (Like that could happen here ! ) It needs a refresher re-watch here abouts.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Jul 16, 2017 2:48:48 GMT
Dude, I created the frickin' thread, so yeah, I've read through it. The POINT is movies within movies, ie: being made within a movie, like Singin' in the Rain. That doesn't encompass films with filmclips from real movies...and there are too many of those being cited. Got it now, dickhead? That's a weird argument; I originally took it as "fictional movies within real movies" as well, but who cares if someone else doesn't? Creating the thread does not give you all rights and privileges over where it goes. And I've liked (literally and electronically) some of your comments and thoughts before, Naterdawg, but insulting others isn't going to get you anywhere, or any brownie points with anyone here. It just makes you look immature and silly. Learn how to hold an intelligent dialogue, bereft of insults. You having a bad day, bud?
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Jul 16, 2017 2:49:55 GMT
As an alternative, I suggest you go play a game of solitaire BY yourself at a table near the watercooler. Bu-Bye !
|
|