|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 18, 2017 20:03:44 GMT
It's time for them to close up shop. This whole cinematic universe business is proving to be too difficult for them. Just stick to making kiddie movies.lol, I thought that is exactly what they are doing. Kiddy audiences do not question logic but are content with "a wizard did it" explanations. Perfect fit. Or would you ever place dialogue such as "Hahahah, I am famous for my huge turds", "Dance off...we are the GotG bitch", "I cant get babies, I feel like a monster, so let's play hide-the-zucchini, Hulk" or "I don't care he killed my mommy!!!" (two times) in any adult movie you have seen....? |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Jul 18, 2017 20:22:35 GMT
Who's saying that the film is actually set in 2020? Who? The movie that's who, by stating "8 years later" (after Avengers). One of the earliest scenes in the film takes place directly after the battle that took place in The Avengers. According to a quick title card that appears in the film, Homecoming takes place eight years after the events of that battle. The Avengers according to Marvel's official timeline takes place in 2012. We’re also led to believe that the events of Homecoming take place a few months after Civil War. Especially when the movie opens with shaky-hand cam footage of Spider-Man in Civil War before diving right into Homecoming. But if so the “eight years” past or later sentiment doesn’t make any sense. If Civil War takes place in 2016, which we know it does thanks to some calendar shots and official timelines, than Homecoming can’t exist in 2020. Btw evidently this is not the first time-mess in the MCU. Eg: In Civil War (playing in 2016), the "Vision" dude states the moment that Tony Stark publicly announced that he was Iron Man took place eight years ago. While that makes sense when looking at Iron Man’s release date, it contradicts what Marvel itself previously announced as its timeline setting the IM 1 events in 2010/11). If Tony Stark announced that he was Iron Man eight years before Civil War, that would be 2008, not the official date Marvel had given. At this point, both Homecoming and Civil War contradict the timeline that Marvel has given. Simply put, the math doesn’t add up. If anything, Homecoming just adds to the main issue — Marvel doesn’t know when its movies have been set. Even worse, with the studio changing things on the fly, it messes around the barely comprehensible timeline they’ve provided thus far. So you can only think of one way but can't think of the other.
Not surprising, given that you're that obnoxious troll from 'The Force Awakens' board.
|
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Jul 18, 2017 20:23:27 GMT
It's time for them to close up shop. This whole cinematic universe business is proving to be too difficult for them. Just stick to making kiddie movies.lol, I thought that is exactly what they are doing. Kiddy audiences do not question logic but are content with "a wizard did it" explanations. Perfect fit. Or would you ever place dialogue such as "Hahahah, I am famous for my huge turds", "Dance off...we are the GotG bitch", "I cant get babies, I feel like a monster, so let's play hide-the-zucchini, Hulk" or "I don't care he killed my mommy!!!" (two times) in any adult movie you have seen....? Says a guy who has 'ThunderCats' logo as an avatar. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 18, 2017 20:40:11 GMT
So you can only think of one way but can't think of the other.
Not surprising, given that you're that obnoxious troll from 'The Force Awakens' board.
oh the delicious irony, coming from Busty the salty ratings-troll, who would always counter arguments with empty "you rated movie X, so your argument for movie Y is wrong". Shame, here you cannot do that anymore. So let's see what you can conjure up instead. Not much it seems: a false cause and ambiguity fallacy (without any proof), and a good old adhom. No arguments though. Why are we not surprised, seeing this coming from the guy who claimed Force Awakens (the infamous epitome of a rehash) was an original movie (and Logan is not, lol)... |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Jul 18, 2017 20:44:33 GMT
So you can only think of one way but can't think of the other.
Not surprising, given that you're that obnoxious troll from 'The Force Awakens' board.
oh the delicious irony, coming from Busty the salty ratings-troll, who would always counter arguments with empty "you rated movie X, so your argument for movie Y is wrong". Shame, here you cannot do that anymore. So let's see what you can conjure up instead. Not much it seems: a false cause and ambiguity fallacy (without any proof), and a good old adhom. No arguments though. Why are we not surprised, seeing this coming from the guy who claimed Force Awakens (the infamous epitome of a rehash) was an original movie (and Logan is not, lol)... Now you're just resorting to blatant lies. I NEVER said that 'The Force Awakens' was "original". |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 18, 2017 20:49:40 GMT
Says a guy who has 'ThunderCats' logo as an avatar. yup most original, avatar trolling seems like a good substitute for ratings-trolling, huh? Speaking of which, I barely recognized you without your girly twilight avatar. Of course I always knew there was an angry little man behind the beauty, but that Bella avatar covered you well. I'd love to see you stand by it again. Do not deny what you are, busty. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Jul 18, 2017 20:54:24 GMT
Says a guy who has 'ThunderCats' logo as an avatar. yup most original, avatar trolling seems like a good substitute for ratings-trolling, huh? Speaking of which, I barely recognized you without your girly twilight avatar. Of course I always knew there was an angry little man behind the beauty, but that Bella avatar covered you well. I'd love to see you stand by it again. Do not deny what you are, busty. 1. Bella Swan avatar was intended as a satire of a vicious anti-MCU troll. 2. You call MCU kiddie while having a cartoon logo. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 18, 2017 21:00:33 GMT
oh the delicious irony, coming from Busty the salty ratings-troll, who would always counter arguments with empty "you rated movie X, so your argument for movie Y is wrong". Shame, here you cannot do that anymore. So let's see what you can conjure up instead. Not much it seems: a false cause and ambiguity fallacy (without any proof), and a good old adhom. No arguments though. Why are we not surprised, seeing this coming from the guy who claimed Force Awakens (the infamous epitome of a rehash) was an original movie (and Logan is not, lol)... Now you're just resorting to blatant lies. I NEVER said that 'The Force Awakens' was "original". lol, of all the things, that last one makes you mad. Fair enough, I am a gentleman, busty, and gentlemen agree on facts. Maybe you did not explicitly state it, but you implied, it or tried to water it down, eg by creating threads with the topic a la: "Why is TFA called a rehash, but The Hobbit trilogy is not..?". And when everybody told you why, you became salty again and reacted with ratings-trolling and adhoms. But that's not to say that I don't like you, or don't enjoy your special brand of trolling, busty.  |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Jul 18, 2017 21:03:50 GMT
Now you're just resorting to blatant lies. I NEVER said that 'The Force Awakens' was "original". lol, of all the things, that last one makes you mad. Fair enough, I am a gentleman, busty, and gentlemen agree on facts. Maybe you did not explicitly state it, but you implied, it or tried to water it down, eg by creating threads with the topic a la: "Why is TFA called a rehash, but The Hobbit trilogy is not..?". And when everybody told you why, you became salty again and reacted with ratings-trolling and adhoms. But that's not to say that I don't like you, or don't enjoy your special brand of trolling, busty. You have no limit where you're willing to sink, don't you? And seriously, on that comparison thread, I didn't even imply that 'The Force Awakens' was original. |
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 949
Likes: 305
 
|
Post by transfuged on Jul 18, 2017 21:43:55 GMT
Hello again.
So, how do they rate pissing contests nowadays ?
Tsk.
Till later,
T
|
|
skribb
Sophomore
IMDb since June 2005
@skribb
Posts: 767
Likes: 204
|
Post by skribb on Jul 23, 2017 1:29:03 GMT
@zackbop
sounds like you hate the MCU. I don't remember that about you? Like I know the MCU is childish at times, but why not? The movies work as they are , they just need more compelling elements and less forced humor. It's not like every MCU movie is as bad as Amazing Spider-Man 2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 2:54:50 GMT
@zackbop sounds like you hate the MCU. I don't remember that about you? Like I know the MCU is childish at times, but why not? The movies work as they are , they just need more compelling elements and less forced humor. It's not like every MCU movie is as bad as Amazing Spider-Man 2. I like every MCU film except for Ant-Man. |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Jul 23, 2017 2:56:53 GMT
@zackbop sounds like you hate the MCU. I don't remember that about you? Like I know the MCU is childish at times, but why not? The movies work as they are , they just need more compelling elements and less forced humor. It's not like every MCU movie is as bad as Amazing Spider-Man 2. I like every MCU film except for Ant-Man. i'm with you on antman, I wanted to like it....but I couldn't and still don't know how to. |
|
