If MCU fans like to worship Kevin Feige and watch MCU movies

I like all of those and want them to be made, that doesn't mean I don't like the MCU.

This idea that you must hate the big players if you like the small ones is nonsense.

If not for anything else, to have a terms of comparison.

The exceptions are nothing without the rule.

Yeah that AI suit was not the most endearing part of SM:H.

But as far as being the best SM ever, well it's not hard IMO.

Why do you care?  Are you suddenly a member of the Directors Guild or Actors Union.  Do you really care, or is this like you "caring" about the success of a female director, or a female led comic book movie, after Wonder Woman is made, because it fits your little agenda.  You don't like Marvel so you pick ANY reason to criticise their output.  How can someone so full of shit also be so transparent?

Kevin Feige dosen't direct, but if he did it would't be worse than Zack Snyder.

That guy dosen't know what he is doing. Good thing Joss Whedon of avengers fame is taking over, don't you think DiCk-Fan?

It's the producer's job to make sure that the director stays on track and delivers a successful film, in the case of franchises as diverse and gigantic as Marvel's you do need someone to steer the ship and make sure it does not travel towards a lightning storm. If a director or writer wants to do something that would alienate fans and divide movie goers and stray too far from everything that has been released thus far then it is probably not the best idea to keep them on board the project, and thus release them over creative differences. In other words, you can't present an Iron Man who is an alien from another dimension in a movie and act like its the real deal when you're making a product that is set within the same continuity where Iron Man is Tony Stark from Earth who is 100% a human being with lots of wealth and technical know-how. Its just not going to work and people will reject it, doesn't matter if the director or writer has serious Oscar credibility or not, it will not go well at all. Producing and directing are two different things, yes, but the role of the producer can extend from just counting beans to being heavily involved in the story.  

Howard, Rourke, Norton, and Portman screwed themselves. Howard wanted more money and wanted War Machine to be the lead in Iron Man 2, which obviously wasn't gonna happen because its called IRON MAN 2, as in its Tony Stark's story. Rourke's ego also got the better of him and he thought he was the lead of Iron Man 2, not RDJ, and wasn't polite about it either. Norton's ego got the better of him and he refused to promote The Incredible Hulk to give the finger to Marvel Studios for making changes to his own re-write of the script, and he was only interested in reprising the role if they got the same director of TIH for The Avengers, and if he got as much or more screen time than RDJ and the other cast members. Natalie Portman never really cared about the Thor property or her character very much, she only signed onto doing the film because of Sir Kenneth Branagh's involvement. Portman didn't like that they chose a different director than Patty Jenkins and just went along with Thor: The Dark World like it was mostly a chore that needed to get done, she didn't much press for either film. One of her purposes as Jane was to serve as the audience's POV to the mystical aspects of the story and support then unknown Chris Hemsworth, now its a different story - the cosmic side of the MCU has been fleshed out further and Hemsworth is a legit leading man in film, so Jane's no longer really needed unless for a very specific reason. 

I'm in that three!  I actually, for the first time here, feel a bit a offended by that

No, that was you and the other two dudes taking about how bad you all want a bukkake from RDJ.

Nah, I think that's just what you need a face full of: spunk, since you're clearly lacking it.