|
|
Post by kuatorises on Aug 2, 2017 18:20:08 GMT
Administration it's followers? No, which administration? The level of blatant bungling, abandonment or even betrayal of key campaign promises, lie after lie (Trump: "The boy scouts called to praise my speech!" Boy Scouts: "No. No we didn't.") Outside of some of the early 1800s, I can't think of an administration that's required this level of blind praise in order to remain a supporter. These are two separate actions; one of which falls under the administration, the other falls under its supporters. Can you really call something a broken campaign promise six months into the president's term? It's not like there isn't time to still fill promises made on the campaign trail – and I don't even like Trump. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Aug 2, 2017 19:21:14 GMT
“All I’m saying is I’ll make great deals and we’ll get them done and we don’t to have use executive orders and all the stuff that Obama is using which at some point, I would imagine the courts are going to overrule in one form or another. But we’re not going to be opening our borders or closing our orders based on executive orders. We’re going to do it. We will get along well.”
He's already issued several executive orders regarding our borders and immigration policies.
“You’re going to end up with great health care for a fraction of the price and that’s gonna take place immediately after we go in. Okay? Immediately. Fast. Quick.”
Yeah. Even with control of all three branches, this didn't get done.
He promised he would work with Congress to introduce for passage in the first 100 days the American Energy and Infrastructure Act -= we've seen nothing yet.
He promised he would work with Congress to introduce for passage in the first 100 days a bill to end the Offshoring Act. No such bill.
Passage in the first 100 days the Affordable Child Care and Elder Care Act - nope.
Hacking report in 90 days - nope.
"Tough new ethics rules to restore dignity to the Office of the Secretary of State" in the first 90 days. Nope.
I can go on. When you make time-dependent promises, it's the time you mentioned that defines the truth of them.
And let's not even get into the "drain the swamp" thing. He stocked his positions with big corp and big energy peeps. Same as always.
|
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Aug 3, 2017 0:52:42 GMT
Ahyuck! Deyz drennin da swamp. Lets shoot some swamp gaytors! This one sure do got a purdy mouth, Bobby Joe!
Yay Trumpz!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2017 1:54:44 GMT
I'm surprised his approval rating is still in the high thirties. His supporters on here and elsewhere sound like they are on another astral plane.
|
|
|
|
Post by snsurone on Aug 3, 2017 3:17:14 GMT
I'm surprised his approval rating is still in the high thirties. His supporters on here and elsewhere sound like they are on another astral plane. They are, Falconia. Racists, rednecks, ignoramuses, etc. are still in this country, and they make up much of Trump's fan base. However, the fact that the majority of Americans do not approve of Trump means that there is still hope for this country. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Aug 3, 2017 16:15:54 GMT
tpfkar Nothing says cult quite like thinking people should be judged on their actions not their religious beliefs, skin color, gender identity, or sexual identity. Yep. Cults are well known for not being hostile to outsiders. being white, particularly male, is practically a crime to SJWs and liberals judge religious people (mostly Christian variety) all the time. For those that want to make "SJW" an easy epithet they can throw out to try to taint reasonable positions with those of wackos. People should be judged by their stances and actions, whatever they are. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Aug 3, 2017 16:24:53 GMT
tpfkar being white, particularly male, is practically a crime to SJWs and liberals judge religious people (mostly Christian variety) all the time. For those that want to make "SJW" an easy epithet they can throw out to try to taint reasonable positions with those of wackos.
People should be judged by their stances and actions, whatever they are.I don't necessarily disagree with this, but I don't pretend that the right are the only ones guilty of just the opposite. The left is quite hypocritical on this matter. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Aug 3, 2017 16:39:09 GMT
tpfkar For those that want to make "SJW" an easy epithet they can throw out to try to taint reasonable positions with those of wackos.
People should be judged by their stances and actions, whatever they are.I don't necessarily disagree with this, but I don't pretend that the right are the only ones guilty of just the opposite. The left is quite hypocritical on this matter. Like "the left" (or "right") is some monolithic creature that could be "hypocritical". |
|
