Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2017 17:12:25 GMT
Ouch!
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Aug 20, 2017 18:11:12 GMT
Making a WW II movie without Americans in it was a bad move.
|
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Aug 20, 2017 19:49:56 GMT
Kids movies always make a disproportionate amount since entire families will go. No one is taking their kids to Dunkirk, yet it has made far more than twice the amount of the Emoji movie, so you don't really have much a point.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 20, 2017 20:41:38 GMT
Kids movies always make a disproportionate amount since entire families will go. No one is taking their kids to Dunkirk, yet it has made far more than twice the amount of the Emoji movie, so you don't really have much a point. funny enough, there were a bunch of families at my Dunkirk screening. |
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Aug 21, 2017 16:43:08 GMT
funny enough, there were a bunch of families at my Dunkirk screening. But not little kids, though, right? I mean, the movie has no blood so it's more younger-person friendly than, say, Saving Private Ryan, but still--not something a wise parent takes a young kid to. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 21, 2017 17:07:38 GMT
funny enough, there were a bunch of families at my Dunkirk screening. But not little kids, though, right? I mean, the movie has no blood so it's more younger-person friendly than, say, Saving Private Ryan, but still--not something a wise parent takes a young kid to. Egh, I'd guesstimate the youngest were 10 or 12. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2017 17:18:07 GMT
Talking about Saving Private Ryan, its funny how dunkirk wont outgross it at domestic box office, despite a PG 13 rating and 19 years of inflation!!!!!
|
|
