|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Aug 20, 2017 23:58:38 GMT
We already know that Thor: Ragnarok is riping off BvS by promoting Hulk vs Thor as the "greatest gladiator match in history", the exact words that Lex Luthor used to describe the Batman vs Superman fight in BvS. Is Thor: Ragnarok also copying the X-Men movies?
In X-Men: Apocalypse, Mystique (who started out as a villain in the X-Men movies) helped the X-Men fight Apocalypse. And in Thor: Ragnarok trailers suggest that Loki (who started out as a villain in MCU) is going to help Thor and Hulk fight Hela.
|
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 21, 2017 0:20:37 GMT
Loki helped Thor in Thor: The Dark World, which was released BEFORE X-Men: Apocalypse. It should be noted that at THE START of Apocalypse Mystique is NOT a villain, Loki however is by no means a goodie-goodie-two-shoes in Ragnarok and reluctantly assist Thor.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 21, 2017 0:57:13 GMT
In the comics, Loki and Thor teamed up long before X-Men tried that. If anything, X-Men ripped off Thor.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Aug 21, 2017 1:17:32 GMT
That's a bit of a stretch.
That's like saying that The Dark Knight Rises copied Batman Returns because Catwoman helped and opposed Batman in both movies.
It's just the way the stories were and are written.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Aug 21, 2017 12:57:03 GMT
Is it going to have a "Martha" scene? It's going to be quite humiliating to DC if Marvel "rips off" their cornerstone movie and does a much better job of it ... with an entry in the Thor series. I'm betting that Thor: Ragnarok will wind up somewhere in the list of top 50 superhero movies. BvS couldn't even manage that!  |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 21, 2017 14:26:22 GMT
It's going to be quite humiliating to DC if Marvel "rips off" their cornerstone movie and does a much better job of it ... with an entry in the Thor series. I'm betting that Thor: Ragnarok will wind up somewhere in the list of top 50 superhero movies. BvS couldn't even manage that!
laughing at yourself, cupcake? I see you still haven't learned how to quote properly so that the addressee is actually informed about your ramblings. Haven’t DC essentially shown how to do a World War movie correctly? You know by showing the horrors of war instead of kiddy laser battles, hail hydra and MrTomatoehead villains? Yes, they did, and may well get nods and/or academy awards for it this year, you know like SS, but this time in the non technical categories. How embarrassing for MCU. And be assured that Ragnarok will turn out MCU FraggleRock. If Marvel are too dumb to know what "Cinematic" means in their own MCU name, they are surely too dumb to understand what Ragnarok means too (total destruction/Armageddon/twilight of the gods- all dead, cupcake)? Bet we get another funny kiddy movie with comedy gold a la "I have sensible nipples" or "I have famously huge turds" including dance off scenes. Luv that huh, just for you, sweet cheeks. Btw, did you make a penis? |
|
|
|
Post by furiousstyles77 on Aug 21, 2017 15:15:48 GMT
It's going to be quite humiliating to DC if Marvel "rips off" their cornerstone movie and does a much better job of it ... with an entry in the Thor series. I'm betting that Thor: Ragnarok will wind up somewhere in the list of top 50 superhero movies. BvS couldn't even manage that!
laughing at yourself, cupcake? I see you still haven't learned how to quote properly so that the addressee is actually informed about your ramblings. Haven’t DC essentially shown how to do a World War movie correctly? You know by showing the horrors of war instead of kiddy laser battles, hail hydra and MrTomatoehead villains? Yes, they did, and may well get nods and/or academy awards for it this year, you know like SS, but this time in the non technical categories. How embarrassing for MCU. And be assured that Ragnarok will turn out MCU FraggleRock. If Marvel are too dumb to know what "Cinematic" means in their own MCU name, they are surely too dumb to understand what Ragnarok means too (total destruction/Armageddon/twilight of the gods- all dead, cupcake)? Bet we get another funny kiddy movie with comedy gold a la "I have sensible nipples" or "I have famously huge turds" including dance off scenes. Luv that huh, just for you, sweet cheeks. Btw, did you make a penis? Not really sure how you can defend DCEU when they have made 3 out of 4 atrocious movies |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 21, 2017 15:19:49 GMT
laughing at yourself, cupcake? I see you still haven't learned how to quote properly so that the addressee is actually informed about your ramblings. Haven’t DC essentially shown how to do a World War movie correctly? You know by showing the horrors of war instead of kiddy laser battles, hail hydra and MrTomatoehead villains? Yes, they did, and may well get nods and/or academy awards for it this year, you know like SS, but this time in the non technical categories. How embarrassing for MCU. And be assured that Ragnarok will turn out MCU FraggleRock. If Marvel are too dumb to know what "Cinematic" means in their own MCU name, they are surely too dumb to understand what Ragnarok means too (total destruction/Armageddon/twilight of the gods- all dead, cupcake)? Bet we get another funny kiddy movie with comedy gold a la "I have sensible nipples" or "I have famously huge turds" including dance off scenes. Luv that huh, just for you, sweet cheeks. Btw, did you make a penis? Not really sure how you can defend DCEU when they have made 3 out of 4 atrocious movies that's actually a good ratio. Not really sure how you can defend MCU when they have made 15 out of 16 raccoon turd movies. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Aug 21, 2017 15:22:34 GMT
It's going to be quite humiliating to DC if Marvel "rips off" their cornerstone movie and does a much better job of it ... with an entry in the Thor series. I'm betting that Thor: Ragnarok will wind up somewhere in the list of top 50 superhero movies. BvS couldn't even manage that!
laughing at yourself, cupcake? I see you still haven't learned how to quote properly so that the addressee is actually informed about your ramblings. Haven’t DC essentially shown how to do a World War movie correctly? You know by showing the horrors of war instead of kiddy laser battles, hail hydra and MrTomatoehead villains? Yes, they did, and may well get nods and/or academy awards for it this year, you know like SS, but this time in the non technical categories. How embarrassing for MCU. And be assured that Ragnarok will turn out MCU FraggleRock. If Marvel are too dumb to know what "Cinematic" means in their own MCU name, they are surely too dumb to understand what Ragnarok means too (total destruction/Armageddon/twilight of the gods- all dead, cupcake)? Bet we get another funny kiddy movie with comedy gold a la "I have sensible nipples" or "I have famously huge turds" including dance off scenes. Luv that huh, just for you, sweet cheeks. Btw, did you make a penis? Funny. I remember 'Suicide Squad' having one of the most poorly-handled villains since 'Fant4stic'... |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 21, 2017 15:38:44 GMT
laughing at yourself, cupcake? I see you still haven't learned how to quote properly so that the addressee is actually informed about your ramblings. Haven’t DC essentially shown how to do a World War movie correctly? You know by showing the horrors of war instead of kiddy laser battles, hail hydra and MrTomatoehead villains? Yes, they did, and may well get nods and/or academy awards for it this year, you know like SS, but this time in the non technical categories. How embarrassing for MCU. And be assured that Ragnarok will turn out MCU FraggleRock. If Marvel are too dumb to know what "Cinematic" means in their own MCU name, they are surely too dumb to understand what Ragnarok means too (total destruction/Armageddon/twilight of the gods- all dead, cupcake)? Bet we get another funny kiddy movie with comedy gold a la "I have sensible nipples" or "I have famously huge turds" including dance off scenes. Luv that huh, just for you, sweet cheeks. Btw, did you make a penis? Funny. I remember 'Suicide Squad' having one of the most poorly-handled villains since 'Fant4stic'... my comparison was Cap1 vis-a-vis WW - I was not referring to SS in this regard. SS I watched again two weeks ago (together with GotG2) and it's an bona fide abomination. You can tell a movie is trash when they - for the entire run - throw dozens of trivial pop songs at you to distract from the lack of quality. The quality of the villain is irrelevant in this lowbrow context. It had all the potential: 2 main black anti-protagonists (male and female) along with the first female antagonist, plus M Robbie as Harley. But it ended up being GotG for intellectually challenged juveniles. Sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Aug 21, 2017 16:13:19 GMT
Oh dear ... are you still trying to win ... in some capacity? I better watch my spelling and punctuation! "Correctly" portrayed war movies don't have hot babes in skimpy costumes on the battle field. Superhero fanboys are hilarious.  Embarrassed about something that hasn't, and in all likelihood, will never happen? Sorry, Ace ... no. That will be head and shoulders better than BvS. That's gotta sting! |
|
|
|
Post by furiousstyles77 on Aug 21, 2017 18:33:09 GMT
Not really sure how you can defend DCEU when they have made 3 out of 4 atrocious movies that's actually a good ratio. Not really sure how you can defend MCU when they have made 15 out of 16 raccoon turd movies. Pretty much every Marvel film thats been made has high critical ratings, and lets not forget the huge box office numbers , 4 of which have grossed over a billion. DCEU on the other hand couldn't even beat a captain america film with its top 2 characters in one film, thats pretty fucking embarrassing if you ask me. Marvel is on another level , think thats clear for everyone to see, DCEU just try and mimic Nolan, nothing will ever come close to Nolans from DCEU |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Aug 21, 2017 19:03:43 GMT
Funny. I remember 'Suicide Squad' having one of the most poorly-handled villains since 'Fant4stic'... my comparison was Cap1 vis-a-vis WW - I was not referring to SS in this regard. SS I watched again two weeks ago (together with GotG2) and it's an bona fide abomination. You can tell a movie is trash when they - for the entire run - throw dozens of trivial pop songs at you to distract from the lack of quality. The quality of the villain is irrelevant in this lowbrow context. It had all the potential: 2 main black anti-protagonists (male and female) along with the first female antagonist, plus M Robbie as Harley. But it ended up being GotG for intellectually challenged juveniles. Sad.
'Captain America: The First Avenger' was likely to be a dieselpunk film with World War II backdrop from get-go. That's not necessarily something to be ashamed of. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 22, 2017 0:20:08 GMT
It's going to be quite humiliating to DC if Marvel "rips off" their cornerstone movie and does a much better job of it ... with an entry in the Thor series. I'm betting that Thor: Ragnarok will wind up somewhere in the list of top 50 superhero movies. BvS couldn't even manage that!
Haven’t DC essentially shown how to do a World War movie correctly?And be assured that Ragnarok will turn out MCU FraggleRock. If Marvel are too dumb to know what "Cinematic" means in their own MCU name, they are surely too dumb to understand what Ragnarok means too (total destruction/Armageddon/twilight of the gods- all dead, cupcake)? Bet we get another funny kiddy movie with comedy gold a la "I have sensible nipples" or "I have famously huge turds" including dance off scenes. Luv that huh, just for you, sweet cheeks. Btw, did you make a penis? No. And it's not the MCU's fault you dislike realistic dialog instead of wannabe artsy-fartsy nonsense like what DC churns out. |
|
