|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 21, 2017 4:08:41 GMT
I'm voting No. If the thread takes off I'll explain my reasons.
|
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 21, 2017 5:11:22 GMT
I say HELL no.
|
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Aug 21, 2017 5:13:04 GMT
I'm voting No. If the thread takes off I'll explain my reasons. Yes. Why wouldn't I trust a giant corporation? I bet you're against being "implanted" with life saving vaccines too, you conspiracy loon. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 21, 2017 5:18:21 GMT
I'm voting No. If the thread takes off I'll explain my reasons. Yes. Why wouldn't I trust a giant corporation? I bet you're against being "implanted" with life saving vaccines too, you conspiracy loon. Yup.  |
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 21, 2017 5:20:56 GMT
I'm voting No. If the thread takes off I'll explain my reasons. Yes. Why wouldn't I trust a giant corporation? I bet you're against being "implanted" with life saving vaccines too, you conspiracy loon. So you'd trust the corporation in the 60s that said Agent Orange was perfectly harmless? Or the tobacco corporation in the 30s that got doctors to say cigarettes were healthy? |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 21, 2017 5:32:52 GMT
Yes. Why wouldn't I trust a giant corporation? I bet you're against being "implanted" with life saving vaccines too, you conspiracy loon. So you'd trust the corporation in the 60s that said Agent Orange was perfectly harmless? Or the tobacco corporation in the 30s that got doctors to say cigarettes were healthy? I think he was being sarcastic, based on his earlier posts on these boards. I hope he was. The corporation I work for went with a fingerprint time clock several months ago. If they ever start mandatory chipping, I quit. |
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 21, 2017 5:38:57 GMT
So you'd trust the corporation in the 60s that said Agent Orange was perfectly harmless? Or the tobacco corporation in the 30s that got doctors to say cigarettes were healthy? I think he was being sarcastic, based on his earlier posts on these boards. I hope he was. The corporation I work for went with a fingerprint time clock several months ago. If they ever start mandatory chipping, I quit. I started to think the same thing after I posted that, but I have run into so many blind sheep over the years who never think 'the company' or the government for that matter, could ever do any wrong, or ever be up to anything ominous, it's just mind boggling. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 21, 2017 5:47:54 GMT
I think he was being sarcastic, based on his earlier posts on these boards. I hope he was. The corporation I work for went with a fingerprint time clock several months ago. If they ever start mandatory chipping, I quit. I started to think the same thing after I posted that, but I have run into so many blind sheep over the years who never think 'the company' or the government for that matter, could ever do any wrong, or ever be up to anything ominous, it's just mind boggling. So true. When they resort to responses like, "What evidence do you have that they are doing anything wrong?" it means they have nothing else to use, or they would have already used it. I see that you have 655 posts. In case you didn't know, when you get to 666 your stars will turn black and SATAN will appear under your name. It's somebody's idea of funny.  |
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Aug 21, 2017 5:52:06 GMT
I started to think the same thing after I posted that, but I have run into so many blind sheep over the years who never think 'the company' or the government for that matter, could ever do any wrong, or ever be up to anything ominous, it's just mind boggling. So true. When they resort to responses like, "What evidence do you have that the are doing anything wrong?" it means they have nothing else to use, or they would have already used it. I see that you have 655 posts. In case you didn't know, when you get to 666 your stars will turn black and SATAN will appear under your name. It's somebody's idea of funny. That a fact? Maybe I can loophole around that. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Aug 21, 2017 7:40:01 GMT
Computer chips are unreliable. DNA scanners would be more effective.
|
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Aug 21, 2017 8:20:40 GMT
They're working on skin tattoos that allow you to interface with computer stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 21, 2017 9:21:38 GMT
They're working on skin tattoos that allow you to interface with computer stuff.  |
|
|
|
Post by yougotastewgoinbaby on Aug 21, 2017 18:08:36 GMT
Computer chips? No
Potato chips? Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Aug 21, 2017 19:24:24 GMT
They're working on skin tattoos that allow you to interface with computer stuff.  |
|
