blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 17:43:00 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 17:44:31 GMT
many gays are so angry.
LINK?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 17:47:22 GMT
many gays are so angry.LINK?
Is your "condition" flaring up again? The link is right in the first post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 17:52:13 GMT
The link is right in the first post.
Incorrect. There is a link in the first post that merely asserts the same premise. Classic straw man. Can neither you nor your link provide some data in lieu of feces?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 17:55:56 GMT
The link is right in the first post.
Incorrect. There is a link in the first post that merely asserts the same premise. Classic straw man. Can neither you nor your link provide some data in lieu of feces?
Is he correct?
What about this question do you need explained?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 18:01:23 GMT
Do you agree there is no data to even begin to qualify his speculations? Knowing this do you not know it is impossible for him to be either correct or incorrect, other than the errant fallacy of using unverified assumptions to form hypotheses? BTW, in spite of this everyone knows you think he's correct, monkeyspanker.
|
|
Moviefan
Sophomore
@allaby
Posts: 565
Likes: 284
|
Post by Moviefan on Feb 28, 2017 18:06:55 GMT
No, he is not correct. The entire premise of the article is faulty. Gay people aren't any angrier than straight people and they get angry for the same reasons as any other person does. The idea that gay people are angry "because of the fact that they ended up “gay” and they are angry at who caused them to end up in this condition" is ridiculous and the author of the article does nothing to prove or back this up. The author claims that "gays will always fight for social acceptance because deep down they don’t accept themselves" but offers no evidence to support this ridiculous notion. The article is extremely bigoted and homophobic and poorly written. It is full of assumptions which are not proven or supported in any way. A very dishonest article.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:08:30 GMT
Do you agree there is no data to even begin to qualify his speculations? Knowing this do you not know it is impossible for him to be either correct or incorrect, other than the errant fallacy of using unverified assumptions to form hypotheses? BTW, in spite of this everyone knows you think he's correct, monkeyspanker.
When did I claim to have data idiot?
I posted an article written by a single person.. making it obvious that it was an opinion piece. Then I even asked "is he correct?" Making it clear that I knew there was the possibility he could be wrong.
You made another knee jerk response and couldn't read the two lines of the OP. Classic eddy-syndrome.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 18:11:21 GMT
Almost everyone here knows you think he's correct, including you.
You ain't foolin' anyone, fartwaffle.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:12:16 GMT
No, he is not correct. The entire premise of the article is faulty. Gay people aren't any angrier than straight people and they get angry for the same reasons as any other person does. The idea that gay people are angry "because of the fact that they ended up “gay” and they are angry at who caused them to end up in this condition" is ridiculous and the author of the article does nothing to prove or back this up. The author claims that "gays will always fight for social acceptance because deep down they don’t accept themselves" but offers no evidence to support this ridiculous notion. The article is extremely bigoted and homophobic and poorly written. It is full of assumptions which are not proven or supported in any way. A very dishonest article. Do you have any evidence to support that Steve? Since you went there it goes both ways.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:13:13 GMT
Almost everyone here knows you think he's correct, including you. You ain't foolin' anyone, fartwaffle. So did you not read the two short lines of the OP or did you not understand them?
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Feb 28, 2017 18:13:24 GMT
i would rather read something from a catholic. seeings how they literally invented the torture devices used on us.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Feb 28, 2017 18:14:14 GMT
Not interested in reading what some random Mormon has to say.
Thanks for the offer.
Homosexuality is not a concern for me. Feels good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 18:21:41 GMT
This was written by a Mormon a few years ago. Is he correct? No he isn't. Well, that was easy. Irony aside - if I were gay, that article would make me angry...
|
|
Moviefan
Sophomore
@allaby
Posts: 565
Likes: 284
|
Post by Moviefan on Feb 28, 2017 18:33:28 GMT
No, he is not correct. The entire premise of the article is faulty. Gay people aren't any angrier than straight people and they get angry for the same reasons as any other person does. The idea that gay people are angry "because of the fact that they ended up “gay” and they are angry at who caused them to end up in this condition" is ridiculous and the author of the article does nothing to prove or back this up. The author claims that "gays will always fight for social acceptance because deep down they don’t accept themselves" but offers no evidence to support this ridiculous notion. The article is extremely bigoted and homophobic and poorly written. It is full of assumptions which are not proven or supported in any way. A very dishonest article. Do you have any evidence to support that Steve? Since you went there it goes both ways. The evidence is in the article itself. The author makes negative statements about homosexuals and offers no evidence. He makes assumptions and generalizations based on his own prejudices. It is very critical and derogatory and shows an obvious prejudice against gay people.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:38:02 GMT
Do you have any evidence to support that Steve? Since you went there it goes both ways. The evidence is in the article itself. The author makes negative statements about homosexuals and offers no evidence. He makes assumptions and generalizations based on his own prejudices. It is very critical and derogatory and shows an obvious prejudice against gay people. Funny cause I read the article and there was nothing homophobic or bigoted. So I'll be waiting on that evidence.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:39:36 GMT
This was written by a Mormon a few years ago. Is he correct? No he isn't. Well, that was easy. Irony aside - if I were gay, that article would make me angry... He isn't what? Are you saying there is no truth at all in this article?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 18:40:25 GMT
I am too lazy to read this thread...
But is the answer 'because they have read some of the homophobic bilge posted on this forum?'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 18:47:26 GMT
No he isn't. Well, that was easy. Irony aside - if I were gay, that article would make me angry... He isn't what? He isn't correct. Careful analysis might find one or two points, but honestly at first glance it seemed to me that every single thing in the article is wrong. Frankly, I doubt his honesty.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:48:57 GMT
He isn't correct. Careful analysis might find one or two points, but honestly at first glance it seemed to me that every single thing in the article is wrong. Frankly, I doubt his honesty. So there is some truth in the article. Thank you for your honesty.
|
|