Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 5:53:29 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 18:07:35 GMT
Wow. Why so short?  |
|
|
|
Post by Hitman's Bodyguard on Aug 24, 2017 18:22:16 GMT
Good news, if it's true. Means we will get a really action packed movie. No more i expect.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 20:23:44 GMT
Good news, if it's true. Means we will get a really action packed movie. No more i expect. Yeah. A lot of good films are 90 mins long. Used to be that most of them were. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 21:53:56 GMT
I usually like longer movies but this seems like a film that would totally rock a 90 minute run time
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 24, 2017 22:16:22 GMT
I feel like he's trolling.
|
|
|
|
Post by azzajones on Aug 25, 2017 6:14:30 GMT
The 'it has 40 minutes of credits' line makes me think he's trolling.
It's probably 90+40 minutes.
Yes, I can do math - that'd be 130 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Aug 25, 2017 6:22:19 GMT
Wow. Why so short? Four 20 minute dance offs and 10 minutes of end credit scenes plugging the next cookie cutter mcu movie. Also lots of turd jokes. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 25, 2017 8:12:45 GMT
Wow. Why so short? because allegedly they cut the entire third act as it was too downbeat; you know the Ragnarok part where all immorals are brutally killed in the twilight of the gods and the world ends.
Marvel are ashamed of the source material.
(sorry could not resist)
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 25, 2017 11:39:20 GMT
Good, means there's no padding or filler and we just get nothing but story.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitman's Bodyguard on Aug 25, 2017 12:24:58 GMT
You mean, we get a lot action in Thor 3. Story isn't really important here.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 25, 2017 12:52:45 GMT
You mean, we get a lot action in Thor 3. Story isn't really important here. Both, only difference is that there's no extra time to load up with padding and useless scenes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2017 3:04:05 GMT
I feel like he's trolling. Possibly. But didn't he say in a earlier statement that the movie would be around 100 minutes? |
|
