Do you believe that star wars is limited?

I don't think it's limited unless the people who make the films deliberately make them limited. I think movies like Jurassic Park are more limited. How many times can you do a movie where dinos get loose in a park, chase humans, etc. before it becomes repetitive and formulaic?

This is why I liked "Rogue One" and didn't like "Force Awakens" nearly as much as I wanted to.

The universe is big enough to take on it from some different angles. "Rogue One" for example really doesn't deal with the Jedi/force stuff much at all and seems more like it focuses on the military aspect of what's going on. Pretty sure the Emperor was never mentioned or appeared. That sort of thing made it work.

There were MS-DOS PC flight sims ("Tie Fighter") that I remember as a kid. They follow the path of an Imperial pilot who's more or less just doing his job...mostly completely removed from any events in the movies. Even though it was a simple story, I found it more interesting than "Force Awakens."

Hell, I'm pretty sure I'd love a Kevin Smith movie about two clerks at the Death Star cafeteria who are apathetic to the war and are trying to scam their HMO or something.

You and your little friend seem either to be completely ignorant of how expansive and rich the Star Wars mythology is, or you guys are trolling. 

It's limited.
The appeal of Star Wars was A grade FX put into a B grade sci-fi story. It had the advantage in the 80s-but by the 90s too many other films were stealing the innovations so it couldnt compete. Lucas waited too long for the prequels and really should have done the sequels first to take advantage of actor ages.

With the diversity SJW BS of Disney corp it will keep getting further away from old fashioned adventure.
I am curious what Ron Howard does since he *may* have a little more clout to do things he wants to do, but he doesn't strike me as the right director for a space pirate film.