|
|
Post by blockbusted on Aug 31, 2017 16:21:15 GMT
...is that it doesn't actually feel like an action film. Sure it has action sequences, but the film's focus is mostly on Peter Parker actually becoming Spider-Man.
Let's face it, for all the variety we've been getting from MCU, all of them were definite action films. I think it's actually refreshing that we're seeing a superhero film that is not exactly an action film.
And before somebody say "but you hated 'Fant4stic' because it lacked action!", I hated that film not only because it lacked action, but because it lacked EVERYTHING. 'Spider-Man: Homecoming' may lacked action sequences, but at least it filled those places with Peter Parker's high school life and him becoming Spider-Man. |
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Aug 31, 2017 18:07:01 GMT
It's a John Hughes superhero movie.  |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Aug 31, 2017 19:10:58 GMT
The original Raimi movies weren't really the sort of traditional action Superhero movies either.
They always said that those movies were so financially success because they were also popular with women because the movies had a strong romantic plot line between Peter Parker and Mary Jane.
It sets them apart from the usual.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 31, 2017 19:11:36 GMT
It didn't always succeed with the John Hughes angle but it was refreshing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2017 19:37:25 GMT
It didn't always succeed with the John Hughes angle but it was refreshing. John Hughes didn't always succeed with the John Hughes angle, either, to be fair. |
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Aug 31, 2017 22:29:01 GMT
I ll still to the first two movies and ASM
This felt like a disney channelmovie
|
|
|
|
Post by HorrorMetal on Dec 3, 2018 15:58:22 GMT
I liked the hero/villain dynamic, which was probably the best since Spider-Man 2. And I also like how the love story wasn't the main focus and how the romance was turned way down as opposed to previous Spidey flicks.
|
|
