Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2017 1:56:03 GMT
Are you not able to read, Erjen? I've said what I meant. So no proof yet? Bill Gates says vaccinations can reduce the world's population. Do you agree with him? Is that why you haven't provided any proof of what you say? Because of Bill Gates?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2017 2:11:54 GMT
I just checked with our old friend Wikipedia and it says that Elberton has an elevation of 1,289 feet (a tad over a fifth of a mile), while here in Coffee Springs I'm at a mere 213 feet (less than the length of a football field). So after the pole shift (or "global warming" if you prefer) rearranges the map of the world, the Georgia Guidestones will have a better chance of remaining high and dry than my place will, so that future generations can see them without scuba diving, yes? You could always move your camper to higher ground.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2017 2:13:40 GMT
I just checked with our old friend Wikipedia and it says that Elberton has an elevation of 1,289 feet (a tad over a fifth of a mile), while here in Coffee Springs I'm at a mere 213 feet (less than the length of a football field). So after the pole shift (or "global warming" if you prefer) rearranges the map of the world, the Georgia Guidestones will have a better chance of remaining high and dry than my place will, so that future generations can see them without scuba diving, yes? You could always move your camper to higher ground. Only if he can find wheels for it.
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Sept 18, 2017 2:32:37 GMT
Really? Then you'll have to give me a link to jog my memory. If vaccines save lives, how do they make the population go down? Are you serious? The link to Gates rationale for what he is saying is right there in my first reply. That's what I linked you to last time, when i was talking about the context of the Bill Gates TED talk comments. I linked the TED talk too. Here is part of the conversation on Hollilla, which as always only has some of the posts, but maybe it'll jog your memory. www.hollilla.com/reader.php?action=thread&thread=5107319&offset=0
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Sept 18, 2017 2:35:43 GMT
Except that I already explained how it did. Still no proof of what you said? I'd say "what a shock" but it really isn't. Yes, and your explanation was pathetic. When fewer people die, the population is reduced. When fewer children die, people have less babies, and the net effect is reduced population growth. That is what Gates is talking about. How many more times do you need to have it explained to you?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 18, 2017 2:39:51 GMT
Yes, and your explanation was pathetic. When fewer people die, the population is reduced. When fewer children die, people have less babies, and the net effect is reduced population growth. That is what Gates is talking about. How many more times do you need to have it explained to you? That's garbage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2017 2:44:29 GMT
When fewer children die, people have less babies, and the net effect is reduced population growth. That is what Gates is talking about. How many more times do you need to have it explained to you? That's garbage. And the proof will be coming any minute now, right? Sure it will.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 18, 2017 2:48:16 GMT
And the proof will be coming any minute now, right? Sure it will. You and Bill Gates are the ones claiming that vaccines reduce the population. You're the ones who need to prove it.
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Sept 18, 2017 3:43:47 GMT
When fewer children die, people have less babies, and the net effect is reduced population growth. That is what Gates is talking about. How many more times do you need to have it explained to you? That's garbage. The garbage is you claiming Bill Gates wants massive population reduction, perhaps to levels close to what it says on the guidestone, within a century or two. He is actually talking about slowing population growth, as population is a massive component in his CO2 equation. He also talks about vaccines and population as part of the equation Health = resources/population. Do you understand the difference between total population and population growth?
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Sept 18, 2017 3:56:21 GMT
And the proof will be coming any minute now, right? Sure it will. You and Bill Gates are the ones claiming that vaccines reduce the population. You're the ones who need to prove it. A couple of points. The main issue is you think Bill Gates wants to greatly reduce population, and somehow he is going to do it largely through vaccination. You are wrong. He wants to slow population growth by reducing birth rates, and in his eyes the way to do it is by increasing health, and lowering infant mortality rates, in PART through vaccination. So you are wrong on his motivation. You play silly little videos, played out of context as if it is proof, and then you ignore the context when given to you. Another point is you always ask for proof from others, but ignore requests for evidence/proof of your claims. So, why would someone go to the trouble of looking up research papers on birth rates and vaccination rates? For a start, you wouldn't read it if linked it. Secondly, you would just pop back up a year or two later claiming Bill Gates wants significant depopulation, and that vaccinated populations and increased health dont reduce birth rates... It is as pointless giving you proof, as it is asking you for proof of your claims.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 18, 2017 4:05:33 GMT
The garbage is you claiming Bill Gates wants massive population reduction, perhaps to levels close to what it says on the guidestone, within a century or two. He is actually talking about slowing population growth, as population is a massive component in his CO2 equation. He also talks about vaccines and population as part of the equation Health = resources/population. Do you understand the difference between total population and population growth? Did Gates say population or did he say population growth?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 18, 2017 4:06:59 GMT
I just checked with our old friend Wikipedia and it says that Elberton has an elevation of 1,289 feet (a tad over a fifth of a mile), while here in Coffee Springs I'm at a mere 213 feet (less than the length of a football field). So after the pole shift (or "global warming" if you prefer) rearranges the map of the world, the Georgia Guidestones will have a better chance of remaining high and dry than my place will, so that future generations can see them without scuba diving, yes? You could always move your camper to higher ground. I don't have a camper. Can I move my four-bedroom brick house to higher ground?
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Sept 18, 2017 4:14:56 GMT
The garbage is you claiming Bill Gates wants massive population reduction, perhaps to levels close to what it says on the guidestone, within a century or two. He is actually talking about slowing population growth, as population is a massive component in his CO2 equation. He also talks about vaccines and population as part of the equation Health = resources/population. Do you understand the difference between total population and population growth? Did Gates say population or did he say population growth? In the TED talk he said "population" while talking about population growth. He then said "population growth" for the rest of the video. Did you even watch your video? You do have a history of not even knowing what is in the videos you post. They chopped it and repeated it over and over. They even slowed it down.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 18, 2017 4:21:21 GMT
Did Gates say population or did he say population growth? In the TED talk he said "population" while talking about population growth. He then said "population growth" for the rest of the video. Did you even watch your video? You do have a history of not even knowing what is in the videos you post. They chopped it and repeated it over and over. They even slowed it down. If he meant population growth he should have said population growth. Perhaps it was a Freudian slip, like when Mika Brzezinski admitted that it's the MSM's job to control what people think.
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Sept 18, 2017 4:32:59 GMT
In the TED talk he said "population" while talking about population growth. He then said "population growth" for the rest of the video. Did you even watch your video? You do have a history of not even knowing what is in the videos you post. They chopped it and repeated it over and over. They even slowed it down. If he meant population growth he should have said population growth. Perhaps it was a Freudian slip, like when Mika Brzezinski admitted that it's the MSM's job to control what people think. He was talking about population growth. Population growth From 6.8 billion up to 9 billion, but you can lower that (growth to the future 9 billion) by 10 to 15% through vaccination, health care, reproductive services. If you find something confusing, the best thing to do is look for more information. It is beyond clear what he means, based on all the times he has talked about it. Now, are you discounting the rest of the time he was talking about population growth and specifically using the words population growth? You have no excuse for your ignorance on what Gates believes. It has been presented to you in article form, and linked to you in terms of the whole TED talk, and repeatedly explained to you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2017 11:11:46 GMT
And the proof will be coming any minute now, right? Sure it will. You and Bill Gates are the ones claiming that vaccines reduce the population. You're the ones who need to prove it. Already did. Ignoring proof is not the same as not having it, Erjen. But anything it takes to avoid having to prove what you say, right?
|
|