|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 16, 2017 8:15:30 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual, but more pronounced in this case. My thoughts: I can think of another reason why this ugly pile of rocks was set up in Elberton, a reason which the stooge in the video either did not think of or did not mention. I just checked with our old friend Wikipedia and it says that Elberton has an elevation of 1,289 feet (a tad over a fifth of a mile), while here in Coffee Springs I'm at a mere 213 feet (less than the length of a football field). So after the pole shift (or "global warming" if you prefer) rearranges the map of the world, the Georgia Guidestones will have a better chance of remaining high and dry than my place will, so that future generations can see them without scuba diving, yes? Also, I want to say that while I don't agree with the vandalism done against this "monument," I understand it. As mentioned previously on this board, I understand a lot of things that I don't agree with. I see no mention of God on the monument. All I see are vague and touchy-feely bits of advice supposedly for improving the world. It does look as if R.C. Christian may have been a Rosicrucian. Input from a Rosicrucian today might help, but where are we going to find one of those on this board?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Sept 16, 2017 8:17:31 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual, but more pronounced in this case. My thoughts: I can think of another reason why this ugly pile of rocks was set up in Elberton, a reason which the stooge in the video either did not think of or did not mention. I just checked with our old friend Wikipedia and it says that Elberton has an elevation of 1,289 feet (a tad over a mile), while here in Coffee Springs I'm at a mere 213 feet (less than the length of a football field). So after the pole shift (or "global warming" if you prefer) rearranges the map of the world, the Georgia Guidestones will have a better chance of remaining high and dry than my place will, so that future generations can see them without scuba diving, yes? Also, I want to say that while I don't agree with the vandalism done against this "monument," I understand it. As mentioned previously on this board, I understand a lot of things that I don't agree with. I see no mention of God on the monument. All I see are vague and touchy-feely bits of advice supposedly for improving the world. It does look as if R.C. Christian may have been a Rosicrucian. Input from a Rosicrucian today might help, but where are we going to find one of those on this board? I've found part of your problem. You think 1289 feet is "a tad over a mile".
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 16, 2017 8:20:34 GMT
Enjoy. Disclaimer: The usual, but more pronounced in this case. My thoughts: I can think of another reason why this ugly pile of rocks was set up in Elberton, a reason which the stooge in the video either did not think of or did not mention. I just checked with our old friend Wikipedia and it says that Elberton has an elevation of 1,289 feet (a tad over a mile), while here in Coffee Springs I'm at a mere 213 feet (less than the length of a football field). So after the pole shift (or "global warming" if you prefer) rearranges the map of the world, the Georgia Guidestones will have a better chance of remaining high and dry than my place will, so that future generations can see them without scuba diving, yes? Also, I want to say that while I don't agree with the vandalism done against this "monument," I understand it. As mentioned previously on this board, I understand a lot of things that I don't agree with. I see no mention of God on the monument. All I see are vague and touchy-feely bits of advice supposedly for improving the world. It does look as if R.C. Christian may have been a Rosicrucian. Input from a Rosicrucian today might help, but where are we going to find one of those on this board? I've found part of your problem. You think 1289 feet is "a tad over a mile". I was fixing that problem while you were typing your reply. Left out the 1/5. Anything else?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 16, 2017 8:30:55 GMT
I've been playing the Powerball with a friend of mine. Of course it's unlikely that we will win the jackpot, but if we do, and I can purchase that land, that stupid thing will be coming down. Guaranteed. I'm gonna plant some nice trees there instead. How environmental is that? And you may ask, "What harm are they doing?" And I will in turn ask you, "What good are they doing?"
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Sept 16, 2017 9:09:00 GMT
I've been playing the Powerball with a friend of mine. Of course it's unlikely that we will win the jackpot, but if we do, and I can purchase that land, that stupid thing will be coming down. Guaranteed. I'm gonna plant some nice trees there instead. How environmental is that? And you may ask, "What harm are they doing?" And I will in turn ask you, "What good are they doing?" Trees are good. They help control global warming.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Sept 16, 2017 17:42:43 GMT
tpfkar I've been playing the Powerball with a friend of mine. Of course it's unlikely that we will win the jackpot, but if we do, and I can purchase that land, that stupid thing will be coming down. Guaranteed. I'm gonna plant some nice trees there instead. How environmental is that? And you may ask, "What harm are they doing?" And I will in turn ask you, "What good are they doing?" You really need to cut back on the "caffeine". I wasn't asking you. I was asking the parasite who started this thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2017 0:06:00 GMT
I've often thought it would be cool to build a modern stonehenge. Something built to last for thousands and thousands of years. And make it all weird and complicated so our distant descendants spend decades wondering what the hell it was for.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 17, 2017 3:43:22 GMT
tpfkar I've been playing the Powerball with a friend of mine. Of course it's unlikely that we will win the jackpot, but if we do, and I can purchase that land, that stupid thing will be coming down. Guaranteed. I'm gonna plant some nice trees there instead. How environmental is that? And you may ask, "What harm are they doing?" And I will in turn ask you, "What good are they doing?" You really need to cut back on the "caffeine". I wasn't asking you. I was asking the parasite who started this thread.You really n eed to stop stealing oxygen.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 17, 2017 3:45:02 GMT
I've often thought it would be cool to build a modern stonehenge. Something built to last for thousands and thousands of years. And make it all weird and complicated so our distant descendants spend decades wondering what the hell it was for. That would be cool. If you had an imagination, you could let it run wild.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Sept 17, 2017 4:04:52 GMT
tpfkar You really need to cut back on the "caffeine". I wasn't asking you. I was asking the parasite who started this thread.You really n eed to stop stealing oxygen. How much O² do you need with your CNS continuously depressed? On what other board can you push your dirty and sickening agenda?
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Sept 17, 2017 16:34:11 GMT
What, in these ten points of ethical behavior, could possibly be found offensive?
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally, resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature
They sound like a secular guide to a peaceful planet.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 17, 2017 18:50:52 GMT
What, in these ten points of ethical behavior, could possibly be found offensive? 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally, resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature They sound like a secular guide to a peaceful planet. And anyone who doesn't agree will have to be eliminated, in the interests of peace, of course.
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Sept 17, 2017 20:29:02 GMT
What, in these ten points of ethical behavior, could possibly be found offensive? 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally, resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature They sound like a secular guide to a peaceful planet. And anyone who doesn't agree will have to be eliminated, in the interests of peace, of course. Secular Humanists don't eliminate those who don't agree; that is usually done by organized religions and, I might add, very well done if one looks at history.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2017 21:53:54 GMT
What, in these ten points of ethical behavior, could possibly be found offensive? 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally, resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature They sound like a secular guide to a peaceful planet. It's like one of those ink blot tests - what people object to is what they read into it. They don't seem to realise that this says more about them and their assumptions than it does about the actual stones. For instance "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000" is taken to mean "...by murdering the other 6.5 billion." "Guide reproduction wisely" is taken to mean "engage in eugenic practices via infanticide" "Unite humanity with a living new language" is taken to mean "force everyone to stop speaking their native tongue and learn <insert language of most currently hated group here>" And so on, and so on. They pretty much take the stones to be the founding document of a tyrannical genocidal global elite bent on destroying whatever is good and right in the world. Stupid, but one must have hobbies I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 17, 2017 22:40:34 GMT
And anyone who doesn't agree will have to be eliminated, in the interests of peace, of course. Secular Humanists don't eliminate those who don't agree; that is usually done by organized religions and, I might add, very well done if one looks at history. With all due respect, you need not tell me what secular humanists won't do. I did the secular humanism thing for about thirty years, and I was a regular donor to People for the American Way long before I found what they were really about and who George Soros is. So, feel free to think of me as a traitor to the cause if you like. According to Cinemachinery, I bear responsibility for a death in Charlottesville (a town I've never even been close to) because I preferred to take a chance on Donald Trump rather than his main competitor. If you believe that, then understand that you're not going to achieve those stated goals without getting some blood on your hands, especially the one about getting the population down to 500,000,000 and keeping it there. That will not be done without forcibly depriving people of their lives. Guaranteed. It would be best if you did not fool yourself into believing it's going to happen peacefully and happily without anyone being inconvenienced. Fair laws? Whose idea of fair? Many people want the Civil War statues left up. Is it fair to them to take the statues down because others want them taken down? The answer you give to that question depends on what your idea of fair is, and not someone else's idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2017 22:52:33 GMT
Actually that would be pretty easy to do without killing anybody. In fact if current trends continue it will likely happen naturally in a century or two.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 17, 2017 22:58:14 GMT
Actually that would be pretty easy to do without killing anybody. In fact if current trends continue it will likely happen naturally in a century or two. That's too long. Bill Gates wants it done sooner than a century or two. The UN wants it done by the year 2030.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2017 23:07:19 GMT
Actually that would be pretty easy to do without killing anybody. In fact if current trends continue it will likely happen naturally in a century or two. That's too long. Bill Gates wants it done sooner than a century or two. The UN wants it done by the year 2030. Sure they do, in your mind. But we're talking about the actual world here. Where they don't.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 17, 2017 23:24:35 GMT
That's too long. Bill Gates wants it done sooner than a century or two. The UN wants it done by the year 2030. Sure they do, in your mind. But we're talking about the actual world here. Where they don't. Explain how vaccines reduce world population, please. Or, go away and stop wasting my time.
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Sept 17, 2017 23:41:22 GMT
Secular Humanists don't eliminate those who don't agree; that is usually done by organized religions and, I might add, very well done if one looks at history. With all due respect, you need not tell me what secular humanists won't do. I did the secular humanism thing for about thirty years, and I was a regular donor to People for the American Way long before I found what they were really about and who George Soros is. So, feel free to think of me as a traitor to the cause if you like. According to Cinemachinery, I bear responsibility for a death in Charlottesville (a town I've never even been close to) because I preferred to take a chance on Donald Trump rather than his main competitor. If you believe that, then understand that you're not going to achieve those stated goals without getting some blood on your hands, especially the one about getting the population down to 500,000,000 and keeping it there. That will not be done without forcibly depriving people of their lives. Guaranteed. It would be best if you did not fool yourself into believing it's going to happen peacefully and happily without anyone being inconvenienced. Fair laws? Whose idea of fair? Many people want the Civil War statues left up. Is it fair to them to take the statues down because others want them taken down? The answer you give to that question depends on what your idea of fair is, and not someone else's idea. What medications are you on? You might want to check with your pharmacist, I think you might be having some interactions.
|
|