dnno1
Sophomore
@dnno1
Posts: 321
Likes: 151
|
Post by dnno1 on Oct 12, 2017 16:32:30 GMT
Fixed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2017 21:56:03 GMT
Fixed. Yes, it does belong in a litter box.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 13, 2017 0:16:25 GMT
Newspaper in Daredevil puts the "Battle of New York" in 2012. SMH says "8 Years Later".
2012 + 8 Years = 2020. Everyone else is able to add 2012 + 8. Easily. Why can't you?
Like I said, "8 Years Later" was a MAJOR FUCK-UP by MCU.
If one minor numerical error is all you got, MCU's doing pretty good. 1st, it isn't minor. It completely destroys MCU's timeline.
screenrant.com/marvel-studios-mcu-official-timeline-issues/
"Marvel’s need to address this issue at all comes from the grand plan, the interconnected universe used to tell this long-form story that culminates with Avengers 4 in 2019. As great as the shared universe is, situations like these continue to bring up debates over just how connected these movies should be (not to mention the Marvel TV programming which is ignore by the film side). The less connected they are to each other, the more wiggle room the movies have for creative freedom and to stand alone however, but since the MCU has thrived (in part) due to that continuity, it can’t go back on it now."
MCU has used "it's all connected" as their biggest selling point. So when they fuck-up the timeline, it's not a minor fuck-up. It's a MAJOR FUCK-UP by MCU.
2nd, it's not the only error. I've listed many errors in MCU movies, none of which have been addressed or explained by an MCU fans.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 13, 2017 0:57:31 GMT
If one minor numerical error is all you got, MCU's doing pretty good. 1st, it isn't minor. It is. It really is. Most of the stuff in the TV series isn't major enough to register on the World-Class heroes' radar. Easy explanation. You're clinging to one minor typo and one line of dialog for dear life, but you're willing to ignore all the holes in the DCEU like the Magic Boat, Joker still being alive and Superman basically telling the Army he's Clark Kent and them not doing a thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2017 1:00:11 GMT
This is the most epic Marvel****** I've ever seen. Not even close to resembling reality. Thanks for posting!
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Oct 13, 2017 12:46:32 GMT
oh oh has it not...? Let's fairly compare the first 4 outputs respectively, shall we?
- DCEU after only 3 (three!) movies has already been awarded an Oscar and is discussed to become nominated as first CBM for best film/director this very year; MCU after 16+ movies has NADA (zero, null), not even talk, lol.
- the 4 DCEU films made far more money than the first 4 MCU movies (money making is the only thing MCU really does...); this despite the fact that MCU is milking the super lucrative children/BabyGroot market with it's dumbed down formulaic movies - and thus should always have a natural commercial advantage over DC!
- DCEU has nothing that has a 0%-10% critical rating failure with the lowest viewer ratings ever, i.e,. an abominable pattern of super flops and media embarrassments. DC has very successful shows, but smartly outsourced them to accomodate its more creative, varied, less formulaic output, thereby being able to create different versions of its heroes, - DCEU has the first super-successful female-led CMB in direction and lead after decades of discrimination (under MCU too, just see Patty Jenkins)– and has created an unprecedented media sensation everybody even ppl who never have seen a CBM are aware of (that is what makes MCU boys soo very yealous, lol). Uh, poor MCU after 16+ still prefers to dabble in raccoon turd and to re-rehash spider poo-poo heads for Sony, and only now tries to copy DCEU's approach after DC cleared the way - sad;
- DCEU is the first with two black leads (female and male) and a female antagonist; MCU after 16+ movies is announcing a male lead after DC successfully did it, sad!
- Talk about bad continuity in MCU, you do not need the movies for that: MCU is not even able to get it's own name right, the term "Cinematic" does not entail crummy TV shows and unsellable comics - even though everybody will understand that MCU wants people to forget about that stinker TV dreck it produces LOLOLLOL
Last but not least, MCU will never claw back the Fox-Men, and that is a unrelated yet encouraging parting gift. You have the right to accept your defeat and embarrassment by remaining silent....
Yeah I was going to say, wether or not you like the DCEU movies, they are making money. So in that sense, yeah they're successful! They are only successful because of the characters used and because the MCU is successful. They tried to start with Green Lantern and had to restart. So they went directly to their big guns. It's the equivalent of Iron Man not working, scrapping the idea, then starting over with Spider-man then X-men v Spider-man.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Oct 13, 2017 12:48:43 GMT
This is the most epic Marveltardery I've ever seen. Not even close to resembling reality. Thanks for posting! Well, yeah GotG should have a line off to the side.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 13, 2017 13:02:50 GMT
Yeah I was going to say, wether or not you like the DCEU movies, they are making money. So in that sense, yeah they're successful! They are only successful because of the characters used and because the MCU is successful. They tried to start with Green Lantern and had to restart. So they went directly to their big guns. It's the equivalent of Iron Man not working, scrapping the idea, then starting over with Spider-man then X-men v Spider-man. Your conclusions do not flow from your premises! I guess that made WW the best reviewed CBM ever and such a media sensation and currently the first CBM with serious Oscar buzz. Guess that gave them the Oscar for SS and all the famous score music.
And according to your (fallacious) logic the MCU is "only successful because" of the iconic, superiour and hailed groundwork done by DC/Nolan and Fox Men...yeah I believe that!
The more you try to talk it away the more it will make your misconceptions apparent...
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Oct 13, 2017 13:43:39 GMT
They are only successful because of the characters used and because the MCU is successful. They tried to start with Green Lantern and had to restart. So they went directly to their big guns. It's the equivalent of Iron Man not working, scrapping the idea, then starting over with Spider-man then X-men v Spider-man. Your conclusions do not flow from your premises! I guess that made WW the best reviewed CBM ever and such a media sensation and currently the first CBM with serious Oscar buzz. Guess that gave them the Oscar for SS and all the famous score music.
And according to your (fallacious) logic the MCU is "only successful because" of the iconic, superiour and hailed groundwork done by DC/Nolan and Fox Men...yeah I believe that!
The more you try to talk it away the more it will make your misconceptions apparent...
No because the MCU wasn't truly popular until The Avengers. That's when every studio decided to start their own cinematic universe. That's why they all are pretty much trying to start or rush to there. They think if they get to Avengers they'll make that billion dollar movie. Also, the X-men movies weren't as popular as you think. They didn't bring in the money like Spider-man. The MCU didn't truly bring in the big bucks until Avengers. Like X-men there was a loud popularity until then. X-men didn't bring in the crowd until DoFP. Then it went back down with Apocalypse. I think what the MCU truly did in the beginning was make X-men movie money from characters that were way beneath them in everything. It made characters beneath the X-men in popularity more popular than them. My premise is that DC didn't have that universally loved movie with Green Lantern. It was actually a step down from Iron Man, but the same start for the universe. They wanted it to be bigger than it was so they scrapped it. DC didn't want to put the work in to build the universe. They wanted Avengers now. That's why they kept on with Man of Steel. It was closer to where the MCU is now than Green Lantern was. So they continued with characters people know and like. And adding known characters that have a high following now (Flash TV, Cyborg in animation, WW popularity in BvS) they can build from that. And I'm thinking they still want Hal to be the main Lantern is why they are avoiding him and why they put in Cyborg instead of Stewart (who is more popular because of JL and JLU).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2017 14:17:26 GMT
It was never right to begin with. DC-Fan is just getting salty that Kevin Feige has a successful Cinematic Universe going while DC hasn't.
oh oh has it not...? Let's fairly compare the first 4 outputs respectively, shall we?
- DCEU after only 3 (three!) movies has already been awarded an Oscar and is discussed to become nominated as first CBM for best film/director this very year; MCU after 16+ movies has NADA (zero, null), not even talk, lol.
- the 4 DCEU films made far more money than the first 4 MCU movies (money making is the only thing MCU really does...); this despite the fact that MCU is milking the super lucrative children/BabyGroot market with it's dumbed down formulaic movies - and thus should always have a natural commercial advantage over DC!
- DCEU has nothing that has a 0%-10% critical rating failure with the lowest viewer ratings ever, i.e,. an abominable pattern of super flops and media embarrassments. DC has very successful shows, but smartly outsourced them to accomodate its more creative, varied, less formulaic output, thereby being able to create different versions of its heroes, - DCEU has the first super-successful female-led CMB in direction and lead after decades of discrimination (under MCU too, just see Patty Jenkins)– and has created an unprecedented media sensation everybody even ppl who never have seen a CBM are aware of (that is what makes MCU boys soo very yealous, lol). Uh, poor MCU after 16+ still prefers to dabble in raccoon turd and to re-rehash spider poo-poo heads for Sony, and only now tries to copy DCEU's approach after DC cleared the way - sad;
- DCEU is the first with two black leads (female and male) and a female antagonist; MCU after 16+ movies is announcing a male lead after DC successfully did it, sad!
- Talk about bad continuity in MCU, you do not need the movies for that: MCU is not even able to get it's own name right, the term "Cinematic" does not entail crummy TV shows and unsellable comics - even though everybody will understand that MCU wants people to forget about that stinker TV dreck it produces LOLOLLOL
Last but not least, MCU will never claw back the Fox-Men, and that is a unrelated yet encouraging parting gift. You have the right to accept your defeat and embarrassment by remaining silent....
Epic take-down. Ground and pound! The Marvel fans are sweating and wheezing hard from this.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 13, 2017 14:28:34 GMT
oh oh has it not...? Let's fairly compare the first 4 outputs respectively, shall we?
Epic take-down. Ground and pound! The Marveltards are sweating and wheezing hard from this. yeah, I did an updated one too in which I also included the iconic MUSIC DCEU created. I forgot that aspect here.
The big MCU-fanboy misconception is that they unfairly compare a 16+ universe with one with only 4 films yet. One has to put that biased fallacy in perspective in order to create a fair comparison. The results are interesting really...
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 13, 2017 21:37:17 GMT
They are only successful because of the characters used and because the MCU is successful. They tried to start with Green Lantern and had to restart. So they went directly to their big guns. It's the equivalent of Iron Man not working, scrapping the idea, then starting over with Spider-man then X-men v Spider-man. Your conclusions do not flow from your premises! I guess that made WW the best reviewed CBM ever Artificial Boosters. And it's best reviews still don't beat the MCU. Nothing will come of this, it won't win a thing. SS won an Oscar for Makeup, because for some reason they were impressed with Harley Quinn's makeup staying consistent when went. Or something silly like that. Actually, no. The MCU is successful for giving the finger to the way they did CBMs and doing its own thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2017 23:55:40 GMT
Your conclusions do not flow from your premises! I guess that made WW the best reviewed CBM ever Artificial Boosters. And it's best reviews still don't beat the MCU. Nothing will come of this, it won't win a thing. SS won an Oscar for Makeup, because for some reason they were impressed with Harley Quinn's makeup staying consistent when went. Or something silly like that. Actually, no. The MCU is successful for giving the finger to the way they did CBMs and doing its own thing. Well said, my friend. Well said.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 1, 2017 17:45:01 GMT
The Spanish translates to "How to understand the respective universes." You are not even remotely anti-dc in any way shape or form! Who could EVER accuse YOU of that? Nope, they'd have to be cuh-razy! You're not an obsessed Marvel maniac at all!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2017 19:26:47 GMT
The Spanish translates to "How to understand the respective universes." You are not even remotely anti-dc in any way shape or form! Who could EVER accuse YOU of that? Nope, they'd have to be cuh-razy! You're not an obsessed Marvel maniac at all!
...Said the man who's become my own personal stalker.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 1, 2017 20:19:07 GMT
You are not even remotely anti-dc in any way shape or form! Who could EVER accuse YOU of that? Nope, they'd have to be cuh-razy! You're not an obsessed Marvel maniac at all!
...Said the man who's become my own personal stalker. That's the thing... I don't NEED to stalk you! You spend more time dissing DC on the DC boards than you do on the Marvel boards! You're like bad penny! LOL
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2017 20:25:39 GMT
...Said the man who's become my own personal stalker. That's the thing... I don't NEED to stalk you! You spend more time dissing DC on the DC boards than you do on the Marvel boards! You're like bad penny! LOL What can I say? The DCEU just sucks that much.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 1, 2017 20:31:58 GMT
That's the thing... I don't NEED to stalk you! You spend more time dissing DC on the DC boards than you do on the Marvel boards! You're like bad penny! LOL What can I say? The DCEU just sucks that much. LOL You're just a... weird... raptor.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2017 20:33:41 GMT
What can I say? The DCEU just sucks that much. LOL You're just a... weird... raptor. Oh, and by the way, I created this topic right after DC-Fan started going around insisting that the MCU was just a series of random events slapped together with no forward thought. Oops! Context? What's that?!
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 1, 2017 20:38:05 GMT
LOL You're just a... weird... raptor. Oh, and by the way, I created this topic right after DC-Fan started going around insisting that the MCU was just a series of random events slapped together with no forward thought. Oops! Context? What's that?! Well, if there's a flip side to your coin its DC-FAN. You guys should meet IRL and hug it out. Forget Thor vs. JL. I'd pay to see THAT!
|
|