|
Post by Nalkarj on Sept 19, 2017 0:52:29 GMT
(I originally posted this on the "horror" board, but I think it fits better here.) One of the most curious films ever made, in my opinion. It's an omnibus or anthology movie, telling three different, largely unconnected stories ( à la the similar Dead of Night ['45].) "You Killed Elizabeth" and "Lord Mountdrago," the second and third pieces, are a whodunit and a straightforward horror tale, respectively; only the hammy presence of Orson Welles as the eponymous lead character saves the latter. But it is the first segment, "The Picture" (dir. Wendy Toye, a wonderful talent and one of the very few British female directors working at the time--ah, and a very late edition to manfromplanetx's "International Women's Day" thread!), which has stayed with me for years after seeing the movie. (I first saw this movie when young, which may also have something to do with it.) It's absolutely terrifying, and not in that sense of "boo!" but in that it's akin to a particularly tricky kind of nightmare, in which logic and our quaint assumptions of good and evil are turned topsy-turvy. It's difficult exactly to describe, or even to tell what makes it so scary, but it's a mood that the imagery conjures up; to bring in clichés, words do it no justice. Shades of Robert Aickman's work, perhaps. I recommend the whole movie because it's not long, and "Lord Mountdrago" isn't bad ("...Elizabeth" is rather slow, though), but, if anything, I'm betting the segment that will stay with you is "The Picture." I've got an eerie feeling just thinking about it. Now, I may be building it up too so now that it will disappoint, but I've looked around the Internet and found that many others felt the exact same way about the segment. If you ever get a chance, though, just see what you think. (There is a copy on YouTube, but its picture quality is very bad.) Has anyone else seen this one? Thought the same (or differently) about "The Picture," by any chance?
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Sept 19, 2017 17:01:18 GMT
Orson Welles did nearly anything to collect money to get his own projects of the ground, I have'nt seen the mentioned film so I can't comment on it.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Sept 19, 2017 17:09:40 GMT
Orson Welles did nearly anything to collect money to get his own projects of the ground, I have'nt seen the mentioned film so I can't comment on it. The Welles segment isn't atrocious; indeed, it's well-directed (according to Patrick Macnee, who was in it, Welles started directing the director and eventually had free rein over the whole segment), spooky, and rather amusing. But it's not great, so much so that you'd like to tell people about it--it's just, y'know, good. Whereas I'd say "The Picture" is great: very scary, very eerie, very effective. The mood-building is superb, and it stays with you long after you see it. The other segment, "You Killed Elizabeth," is by far the weakest of the three, though. It feels like a filler Hitchcock Presents episode done while Hitchcock was preparing to direct one himself. Heck, I can't even remember who did kill Elizabeth in that one!
|
|
|
Post by Richard Kimble on Sept 19, 2017 18:21:52 GMT
Supposedly Welles directed most of his segment (it starts about an hour in).
I noted two scenes that are unmistakably Welles: the Latin nightclub and the last psychiatrist scene -- which has a deep focus shot of Welles on couch, shrink in BG, as well as a great pullback. For the rest there are occasional Orsonic touches (overlapping dialogue, quick edits to jarringly different angles) but the auteurist stamp is not quite as strong.
An interesting aspect of 3COM is Korda's possible involvement. London Films was his prod co, and Welles spent some years trying to set up War and Peace with him. Could it be this was another Waterloo, I mean Desilu and Welles made the film as payback for debts?
I got the feeling the very routine middle story was originally bought to make a cheap noirish feature, then somebody stripped it down to its basic plot so it would fit into a half hour.
The first episode looks good but is very slow and rather predictable, especially for anyone who has ever watched The Twlight Zone.
I've always thought of the compendium film as a European genre H'wood occasionally dabbled in, even if IF I HAD A MILLION popularized the form. Dead of Night and the Maugham films (later copied by Fox) used stories that were deemed too slight for features. Continental films kept the form going long after TV anthologies killed it in America -- for one thing it allowed an internationally financed co-production to employ directors and name actors of several nationalities.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Sept 19, 2017 21:54:21 GMT
This anthology has been playing from time to time on the Talking Pictures channel available here in U K. I'll try and catch up with it at some point. Thanks salzmank.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Sept 19, 2017 21:55:32 GMT
This anthology has been playing from time to time on the Talking Pictures channel available here in U K. I'll try and catch up with it at some point. Thanks salzmank. Very welcome, Petrolino. If you get a chance, do see if you agree with me or with Richard Kimble on "The Picture." I think it's wonderfully evocative and effective.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Sept 19, 2017 22:00:51 GMT
This anthology has been playing from time to time on the Talking Pictures channel available here in U K. I'll try and catch up with it at some point. Thanks salzmank. Very welcome, Petrolino. If you get a chance, do see if you agree with me or with Richard Kimble on "The Picture." I think it's wonderfully evocative and effective. I look up all the movie channel listings when I can so I'll set the box to record if it plays again. If I can see it, I'll check back in! Thanks.
|
|