|
|
Post by darkpast on Sept 20, 2017 4:29:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 20, 2017 4:40:00 GMT
If the franchise wants to really have some legs, it needs to get the focus away from Arnold, Linda, etc. and do its own thing with other characters. I don't want the franchise to have to rely on them nor "piggy-back" off of them to keep itself going.
|
|
|
|
Post by shannondegroot on Sept 20, 2017 4:40:22 GMT
Could Ed Furlong be next?
|
|
barkingbaphomet
Junior Member
all backlit and creepysmoking
@barkingbaphomet
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Sept 20, 2017 4:56:32 GMT
so are they just ignoring T3?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2017 10:45:55 GMT
I'm excited by this. I'm just not sure how they'll write in Arnold's advanced age. I didn't mind it in Genysis, but it just worked well with the plot (although I hated what they did with John Connor). Either way, I'm excited!
|
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Sept 20, 2017 12:33:46 GMT
If the franchise wants to really have some legs, it needs to get the focus away from Arnold, Linda, etc. and do its own thing with other characters. I don't want the franchise to have to rely on them nor "piggy-back" off of them to keep itself going. While I didn't like Terminator Salvation, I still think it was the film that took the franchise in a new direction by avoiding the time travel thing and setting the film in a post Judgment Day setting. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 20, 2017 13:00:51 GMT
Someone needs a new house I suppose.
|
|
|
|
Post by sweetpea on Sept 20, 2017 13:45:42 GMT
It did say it was going to be passing the baton. It also doesn't say how she will be in it(is she human?). Same with Arnie-with what they did in T2 with Robert Patrick, I'm sure they can do something about Arnie's look.
|
|
|
|
Post by sweetpea on Sept 20, 2017 13:51:21 GMT
so are they just ignoring T3? Yes, they said direct sequel to T2 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2017 14:26:02 GMT
Cant Cameron just let this rest. He is closing in on billionaire status, which Im sure he will reach before the last Avatar sequel.
|
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Sept 20, 2017 15:06:06 GMT
i have a feeling i will like T3 more than this one. That's because i actually like T3 and don't care at all about what came after
|
|
|
|
Post by NewtJorden on Sept 20, 2017 15:06:33 GMT
Kind of funny to see Cameron so desperate to erase everything after T2, especially after saying how great Genisys is.
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Sept 20, 2017 18:07:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Sept 21, 2017 19:42:59 GMT
so are they just ignoring T3? and 4, and 5. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Sept 21, 2017 19:51:29 GMT
I am a huge fan of the first two, but I don't see how a woman who hasn't been relevant since 1991 is going to save this franchise.I would love to be proven wrong, especially since she's arguably the top female action character of all time,, but I don't see it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2017 22:01:40 GMT
No franchise can just be allowed to rest in peace, huh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Sept 21, 2017 23:55:38 GMT
Nope-because the companies are in a death spiral.
Their fixation on brands and copyright protection are part of it.
Disney is among the most aggressive in wanting to eliminate the public domain.
So even if someone wanted to do something not based on a brand name, they would probably be slapped with a copyright violation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morgana on Sept 22, 2017 9:04:08 GMT
If the franchise wants to really have some legs, it needs to get the focus away from Arnold, Linda, etc. and do its own thing with other characters. I don't want the franchise to have to rely on them nor "piggy-back" off of them to keep itself going. I agree with this. I don't think Arnold or Linda should be anywhere near the franchise. |
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 22, 2017 9:55:07 GMT
I am a huge fan of the first two, but I don't see how a woman who hasn't been relevant since 1991 is going to save this franchise.I would love to be proven wrong, especially since she's arguably the top female action character of all time,, but I don't see it. Returning casting, at least to me, doesn't automatically guarantee an upcoming sequel will be great. Same thing applies to Jeff Goldblum for Jurassic World 2 as it does for Hamilton. When was the last time Jeff Goldblum was relevant? |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Sept 22, 2017 15:52:17 GMT
I am a huge fan of the first two, but I don't see how a woman who hasn't been relevant since 1991 is going to save this franchise.I would love to be proven wrong, especially since she's arguably the top female action character of all time,, but I don't see it. Returning casting, at least to me, doesn't automatically guarantee an upcoming sequel will be great. Same thing applies to Jeff Goldblum for Jurassic World 2 as it does for Hamilton. When was the last time Jeff Goldblum was relevant? Agreed. One needn't look any further than the two Terminator movies Arnold was in after T2. It's not even guaranteed to be good if James Cameron directed it. He's not the same director he was just as Schwarzenegger and Hamilton are the same actors. The stars need to align, so to speak, in order for a movie to succeed. |
|
