|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Sept 26, 2017 11:52:22 GMT
Recently I watched the 1954 film Royal Visit Tasmania, which runs for 45 minutes, was shown in classrooms in the Australian state of Tasmania, and is a documentary about the visit of Queen Elizabeth II to the state.....and it was shot on Kodachrome film!!
The copyright holder of the royal visit film has uploaded it to YouTube:
Also, from the American state of Washington, here's Kodachrome home movie footage of the collapse of Tacoma Narrows Bridge, which occurred in 1940 with no loss of human life:
|
|
|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Sept 27, 2017 4:08:59 GMT
Kodachrome was a great stock! Yes! BTW, have you seen the Kodachrome home movies taken on the set of "The Wizard of Oz"? It includes footage of a deleted scene called "The Jitterbug". Plus, Kodachrome inspired this great song:
|
|
|
Post by ZolotoyRetriever on Sept 27, 2017 5:42:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Oct 1, 2017 19:24:31 GMT
More Kodachrome, via two films from Tasmania, Australia, and uploaded to YouTube by Tasmania's state library: Colour In Industry (1962, 9 minutes), an instructional film about how colour can improve workplace safety.
The Home Builders (1960, 6 minutes) - Documentary/news film about the building of new housing. The uploader gets the title wrong. If you love mid-century suburbia, you'll probably enjoy this film.
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Oct 1, 2017 19:58:16 GMT
Kodachrome was a great stock! My only regret about these fascinating time capsules are the faded and scratched condition of the dupes from which these video files were made, which can't convey the vivid brilliance and presence of the Kodachrome originals. I have some Kodachrome positives in the form of family slides 70 or more years old that still look like they were taken yesterday, as indeed these examples of roughly that age do: ![](https://i0.wp.com/www.pavelkosenko.com/lj/048/08.jpg) ![](https://www.wired.com/images_blogs/gadgetlab/2012/11/kodachrome.jpg) ![](https://photos.vanityfair.com/2014/09/22/54205ffb2e32fc85609d6c0b_image.jpg) ![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-57k_tiBEXvY/U2FlMG4iXwI/AAAAAAAB7GE/lqLbIJSsCns/s1600/London_,_Kodachrome_by_Chalmers_Butterfield_edit.jpg) The proof of your words, Spider, is in those images.
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Oct 2, 2017 2:02:40 GMT
Yes, indeed, Doghouse, without question. I'd almost forgotten what those gorgeous colors look like. If memory serves, the dates of those photos are: defense plant worker, 1942; D.C. corner market, 1940; John Wayne, 1951; postwar London, 1949. They're almost hyper-realistic, but what they do is bring an immediacy to a past that suddenly seems not at all distant. Did you ever read the old Calvin and Hobbes comic strip? If you did, you'll recall that young Calvin's father often told the tyke tall tales just to flummox him. One strip had Calvin asking why old TV shows and movies were black and white, and Calvin's father explained with a straight face, "That's because there was no color until about the late '60s; before then, the entire world was black and white." The final panel had Calvin running to the kitchen yelling, "MOM!?" from which a thought bubble emerged, "NOW what's he been telling him?" Below is a sampling of some remarkable photos made in a process called Autochrome by Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky during the czarist era, mostly 1909-1910. Talk about bringing a distant past to life. ![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/04/article-2572671-1C0604E400000578-24_964x764.jpg) ![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/05/article-2572671-1C061B6A00000578-67_964x637.jpg) ![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/05/article-2572671-1C0B763000000578-118_964x676.jpg) ![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/05/article-2572671-1C0604AC00000578-890_964x655.jpg) ![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/03/05/article-2572671-1C061B8200000578-719_964x743.jpg) I hope Mr. Dacron won't consider this threadjacking; given the topic, they seemed apropos, and are so fascinating in the way they bring living, breathing vitality to faces and places normally represented by only monochrome light and shadow.
|
|
|
Post by ZolotoyRetriever on Oct 3, 2017 1:05:54 GMT
Doghouse6: Same here. I've got boxes of Kodachrome color slides my dad took starting back in the mid-40s, and I'm blown away by the clarity and richness of colors I'm finding in them.
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Oct 4, 2017 0:26:26 GMT
OMG, Doghouse, these are gorgeous photographs! I've never heard of this process, or this photographer, and I thank you so much for introducing him here. Early 1900s - utterly amazing! What a remarkable technique and what a wonderful artist. I will research him immediately. Autochrome was an additive color process (as were the first versions of Kodachrome and Technicolor), where the Kodachrome first marketed in 1935 was a subtractive one (as was the final three-strip Technicolor introduced in '33). And if anyone needs an explanation of the difference, I'm not the one to ask. Even the link below describing the basics says the concepts "can take some time to wrap your head around," and I've been trying for years. lucaskrech.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/22/color-theory-basics-additive-and-subtractive-color-mixing/ Below is some film made at Deauville in 1912: In films from the hand-cranked era, when speeds were variable but rarely exceeded 18 fps, I find that even more than something like color, the proper speed is important for removing that sense of "distance" and rendering them lifelike. In fairness to Mr. Dacron, I'll return the thread to Kodachrome with these 1922 tests of the early additive system based on two, rather then three, colors (the blonde in the second half with the curly bob and grandly affected manner was Mae Murray, who in Norma Desmond fashion, vanished from the screen with the advent of talkies):
|
|
spiderwort
Junior Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@spiderwort
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 9,362
|
Post by spiderwort on Oct 4, 2017 14:19:06 GMT
Doghouse6 Thanks for all this amazing stuff. I'm not sure I can get my brain around the link info, but it's wonderful to be able to try, and to see these clips. Thanks again. And thanks to Matthew the Swordsman for his most interesting post. P.S. The color 1912 film is remarkable, and the two strip Kodachrome is nearly as beautiful as the three strip. I often think of trying to do something really retro, like shooting a film in a stock like Kodachrome (may even 2-strip) - impossible, of course, but maybe finding a way to simulate it. And also shooting a film (well designed and choreographed) in a black box setting, the way the second clip is shot. Have to find the right story for that though - probably a short film, or a section of a long one.
|
|