Anyone plan on watching The Menendez Murders tonight?

Sept 27, 2017 17:22:42 GMT marsexplorer said:

Sept 27, 2017 5:55:26 GMT RiP, IMDb said:

It was alright, but doesn't compare to the main three 'L&O's.

It's a true story that is telling me a lot that I didn't know about the crime and the personalities. 

I'll be watching the 2nd episode.

Agreed. It was interesting. I'll be watching again next week.

The investigation also had a lot of the same things that were in the DeflateGate investigation and this conclusively shows once and for all that Ted Wells wasn't biased against Brady and came back with the correct verdict of guilty against Brady. For example:

1. Prior to the murders, 1 of the brothers wrote a screenplay about a kid who murders his rich parents to get their inheritance. Either that's 1 heck of an incredible co-incidence, or the brothers are guilty of murder. Any reasonable and unbiased person would conclude that's a strong suspicion of guilt.

Similarly, in DeflateGate, Brady gets caught using deflated footballs in a game AND the Patriots happen to have an equipment guy who calls himself "The Deflator" AND "The Deflator" took the Patriots footballs out of the Officials' Locker Room (without authorization from the officials and without notifying the officials) and brought the footballs into a private restroom (which nobody does) even though he could've just used the restrooms in the Officials' Locker Room area without bringing the footballs into the restroom. Again, either those are all incredible co-incidences, or Brady was guilty of cheating. Any reasonable and unbiased person would conclude that's a strong suspicion of guilt, and that's exactly what Ted Wells concluded.

2. 1 of the brothers hired an IT expert to erase a file marked "Will" on their father's computer. So even though there's no evidence that their father re-wrote his will to exclude the brothers from inheriting, any reasonable and unbiased person would conclude that the brothers had the evidence destroyed.

Similarly, in DeflateGate, Brady destroyed the cell phone he used during DeflateGate and claimed that destroying old cell phones was his standard practice (even though he didn't destroy the cell phone he had used prior to the DeflateGate cell phone). Again, any reasonable and unbiased person would conclude that Brady destroyed evidence that would've proven his guilt, and that's exactly what Ted Wells concluded. That's also what 2 federal appellate court judges (who have no affiliation with the NFL and who swore an oath to review evidence objectively and without bias) also concluded when they struck down incompetent Berman's ridiculously incorrect ruling and upheld the guilty verdict against Brady.

So this conclusively proves once and for all that Ted Wells wasn't biased against Brady and that Ted Wells reached the logical and correct verdict that any reasonable and unbiased person would reach - that Brady was guilty of cheating in DeflateGate.