|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 28, 2017 10:08:31 GMT
A few days ago I posted a thread about the Canadian comic actor Jim Carrey and his recent bizarre behavior. I just finished watching other interviews with him since he went "crazy" from his alleged experience with mushrooms, and he made a few references to tetrahedrons. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TetrahedronIt's kind of funny because on another video I watched about the same time (but have not posted yet) tetrahedrons are mentioned as the most basic three-dimensional shape, and it theorizes that the Universe is composed of them. As mentioned earlier, I was a horrible student in school and did fair-to-miserable in all subjects except for geometry (which I aced), so I already knew what a tetrahedron was. A regular tetrahedron is made of four equilateral triangles, but a tetrahedron need not be regular. Now, if the Universe is composed of them, and they are all connected, it follows that if the shape of one is changed the shape of the adjoining tetrahedrons will also be changed. Don't you think that's interesting? I think it's interesting.  |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Sept 28, 2017 10:54:17 GMT
A few days ago I posted a thread about the Canadian comic actor Jim Carrey and his recent bizarre behavior. I just finished watching other interviews with him since he went "crazy" from his alleged experience with mushrooms, and he made a few references to tetrahedrons. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TetrahedronIt's kind of funny because on another video I watched about the same time (but have not posted yet) tetrahedrons are mentioned as the most basic three-dimensional shape, and it theorizes that the Universe is composed of them. As mentioned earlier, I was a horrible student in school and did fair-to-miserable in all subjects except for geometry (which I aced), so I already knew what a tetrahedron was. A regular tetrahedron is made of four equilateral triangles, but a tetrahedron need not be regular. Now, if the Universe is composed of them, and they are all connected, it follows that if the shape of one is changed the shape of the adjoining tetrahedrons will also be changed. Don't you think that's interesting? I think it's interesting. Well, yes, but this assumes the universe is necessarily only 3-dimensional and that what we see is all the dimensions there are (or can be). |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 28, 2017 11:15:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 28, 2017 11:54:33 GMT
As far as I can see, nothing I've put on this thread implies intelligent design. You can't say God anymore. Someone might be offended. Now you have to say intelligent design.
And yet, a contender for the title of most hateful anti-theist troll on the board had to have his say......so that he could acknowledge dimensions beyond the three-dimensional while discouraging any belief in "intelligent design," or "the deliberate supernatural" as he calls it. Where I come from, that's called hollering before you're hit.
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Sept 28, 2017 11:58:11 GMT
As far as I can see, nothing I've put on this thread implies intelligent design. You can't say God anymore. Someone might be offended. Now you have to say intelligent design. And yet, a contender for the title of most hateful anti-theist troll on the board had to have his say......so that he could acknowledge dimensions beyond the three-dimensional while discouraging any belief in "intelligent design," or "the deliberate supernatural" as he calls it. Where I come from, that's called hollering before you're hit. Just because something exists, or might exist, Erjen it does not mean that it is the work of the deliberate supernatural. And no one has called you a creationist. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 28, 2017 12:17:44 GMT
As far as I can see, nothing I've put on this thread implies intelligent design. You can't say God anymore. Someone might be offended. Now you have to say intelligent design. And yet, a contender for the title of most hateful anti-theist troll on the board had to have his say......so that he could acknowledge dimensions beyond the three-dimensional while discouraging any belief in "intelligent design," or "the deliberate supernatural" as he calls it. Where I come from, that's called hollering before you're hit. Just because something exists, or might exist, Erjen it does not mean that it is the work of the deliberate supernatural. And no one has called you a creationist. You're a liar. I was called a creationist constantly on the old board, although I never applied the term to myself. This 3D existence, I am convinced, was created, and it follows a deliberate design. As to what lies beyond it in higher......yes I said higher......dimensions, I don't know yet, but I'm interested. As you are not interested and are convinced you know the answers already, the best thing you could do is back off and stop making a nuisance of yourself for those of us who are interested. It's only good manners. |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Sept 28, 2017 12:27:49 GMT
Just because something exists, or might exist, Erjen it does not mean that it is the work of the deliberate supernatural. And no one has called you a creationist. I was called a creationist constantly on the old board, although I never applied the term to myself. But you were talking about my exchange on this present thread. In fact I don't remember ever having called you such. But does this mean you don't think that the universe and life originated from specific acts of divine creation, as opposed to the scientific conclusion that they came about through natural processes?
I forgive you.
You are entitled to your opinion, naturally. And, lo and behold, it appears to be a creationist one... gee Why is the fourth dimension 'higher' than the third, Erjen - other than the bald numerical count? But, er, clearly I am interested, since I have replied to your quite interesting initial observation. I also freely admit that no-one knows everything there is to know about nature.. Which is why I prefer looking for answers there first, where there is much to be discovered, rather than inventing a whole new level of reality. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 28, 2017 12:37:08 GMT
I was called a creationist constantly on the old board, although I never applied the term to myself. But you were talking about my exchange on this present thread. In fact I don't remember ever having called you such. But does this mean you don't think that the universe and life originated from specific acts of divine creation, as opposed to the scientific conclusion that they came about through natural processes?
I forgive you.
You are entitled to your opinion, naturally. And, lo and behold, it appears to be a creationist one... gee Why is the fourth dimension 'higher' than the third, Erjen - other than the bald numerical count? But, er, clearly I am interested, since I have replied to your quite interesting initial observation. I also freely admit that no-one knows everything there is to know about nature.. Which is why I prefer looking for answers there first, where there is much to be discovered, rather than inventing a whole new level of reality. I would say because more is possible in the fourth dimension than in the third, but I can appreciate why a materialist pig would want to wallow in the third dimension and proclaim that it isn't lower, only different. Forgiveness from a walking corpse means nothing to me. I've explained this to you before, but you keep making a fool of yourself with, "I forgive you." And "clearly," you are interested in something. You're interested in convincing people to blaspheme and become like you are, by any means necessary. |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Sept 28, 2017 12:45:54 GMT
FF: Why is the fourth dimension 'higher' than the third, Erjen - other than the bald numerical count? ERJ: I would say because more is possible in the fourth dimension than in the third, Any ranking like this is just human (and not specifically 'materialist' outside of your perceptual peculiarities.) I forgive you What did your Christ say about forgiveness,s Erjen? I am sorry if you feel so tempted, especially when after all you have such adult and sensible reasons not to be lol |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 28, 2017 12:50:08 GMT
FF: Why is the fourth dimension 'higher' than the third, Erjen - other than the bald numerical count? ERJ: I would say because more is possible in the fourth dimension than in the third, Any ranking like this is just human (and not specifically 'materialist' outside of your perceptual peculiarities.) I forgive you What did your Christ say about forgiveness,s Erjen? I am sorry if you feel so tempted, especially when after all you have such adult and sensible reasons not to be lol Christ told me not to cast my pearls before swine. You asked me. I told you. |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Sept 28, 2017 13:07:25 GMT
Any ranking like this is just human (and not specifically 'materialist' outside of your perceptual peculiarities.) I forgive you What did your Christ say about forgiveness,s Erjen? I am sorry if you feel so tempted, especially when after all you have such adult and sensible reasons not to be lol Christ told me not to cast my pearls before swine. You asked me. I told you. I actually had in mind
“And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins" (Mark 11:25).
“For if you forgive men when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins” (Matthew 6:14-15).
"Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you" (Luke 6:37-38).
Not Christ's porcine jewellery policy. But whatever floats yer boat, you old (creationist) Christian, you.
|
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Sept 28, 2017 13:31:12 GMT
As far as I can see, nothing I've put on this thread implies intelligent design. You can't say God anymore. Someone might be offended. Now you have to say intelligent design. And yet, a contender for the title of most hateful anti-theist troll on the board had to have his say......so that he could acknowledge dimensions beyond the three-dimensional while discouraging any belief in "intelligent design," or "the deliberate supernatural" as he calls it. Where I come from, that's called hollering before you're hit. Before you made this post, nobody brought up "intelligent design" or "the deliberate supernatural" on this thread. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2017 14:07:40 GMT
You're a liar. I was called a creationist constantly on the old board, although I never applied the term to myself.This 3D existence, I am convinced, was created, and it follows a deliberate design. Fan-fucking-tastic. |
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Sept 28, 2017 17:09:22 GMT
A few days ago I posted a thread about the Canadian comic actor Jim Carrey and his recent bizarre behavior. I just finished watching other interviews with him since he went "crazy" from his alleged experience with mushrooms, and he made a few references to tetrahedrons. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TetrahedronIt's kind of funny because on another video I watched about the same time (but have not posted yet) tetrahedrons are mentioned as the most basic three-dimensional shape, and it theorizes that the Universe is composed of them. As mentioned earlier, I was a horrible student in school and did fair-to-miserable in all subjects except for geometry (which I aced), so I already knew what a tetrahedron was. A regular tetrahedron is made of four equilateral triangles, but a tetrahedron need not be regular. Now, if the Universe is composed of them, and they are all connected, it follows that if the shape of one is changed the shape of the adjoining tetrahedrons will also be changed. Don't you think that's interesting? I think it's interesting. Unfortunately, you can't tile space perfectly with regular tetrahedrons. There will be gaps or voids between them. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedron_packing |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Sept 28, 2017 17:15:11 GMT
As far as I can see, nothing I've put on this thread implies intelligent design. You can't say God anymore. Someone might be offended. Now you have to say intelligent design.  Dude what the hell are you on about? Why do you keep trying so hard to pretend you're being censored? |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 28, 2017 17:17:46 GMT
A few days ago I posted a thread about the Canadian comic actor Jim Carrey and his recent bizarre behavior. I just finished watching other interviews with him since he went "crazy" from his alleged experience with mushrooms, and he made a few references to tetrahedrons. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TetrahedronIt's kind of funny because on another video I watched about the same time (but have not posted yet) tetrahedrons are mentioned as the most basic three-dimensional shape, and it theorizes that the Universe is composed of them. As mentioned earlier, I was a horrible student in school and did fair-to-miserable in all subjects except for geometry (which I aced), so I already knew what a tetrahedron was. A regular tetrahedron is made of four equilateral triangles, but a tetrahedron need not be regular. Now, if the Universe is composed of them, and they are all connected, it follows that if the shape of one is changed the shape of the adjoining tetrahedrons will also be changed. Don't you think that's interesting? I think it's interesting. Unfortunately, you can't tile space perfectly with regular tetrahedrons. There will be gaps or voids between them. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedron_packingI never had any thought of tiling space with regular t etrahedrons. |
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Sept 28, 2017 18:41:16 GMT
I never had any thought of tiling space with regular t etrahedrons. Good, that's very sensible of you. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 28, 2017 19:10:39 GMT
Any ranking like this is just human (and not specifically 'materialist' outside of your perceptual peculiarities.) I forgive you What did your Christ say about forgiveness,s Erjen? I am sorry if you feel so tempted, especially when after all you have such adult and sensible reasons not to be lol Christ told me not to cast my pearls before swine. You asked me. I told you. You are exactly the sort of swine upon whom the pearls are wasted. |
|
