Flynn
Sophomore
@flynn
Posts: 515
Likes: 270
 
|
Post by Flynn on Sept 28, 2017 11:36:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by lostinlimbo on Sept 28, 2017 12:20:34 GMT
My friend was talking to me about it the other week. Very surprising, as I didn't think she would want to return after "Resurrection". He was telling me that this film was going to follow the original two films. Anyhow it would have been interesting to see how they would've explain things if it followed "Resurrection". Just imagine the groans if it was all just a dream.
|
|
Flynn
Sophomore
@flynn
Posts: 515
Likes: 270
|
Post by Flynn on Sept 29, 2017 2:55:15 GMT
I love HALLOWEEN, and even enjoy HALLOWEEN II, but I feel like the HALLOWEEN franchise has run its course. I think Friday the 13th had the right idea with changing out casts every film. By making Michael only attack family and friends of family, it limits the scope of the films. It also undermines the original ending of "he could be anywhere; he could be coming after you now."
I'm just tired of Michael going after yet another family member. They need to break away from the Myers blood.
|
|
|
|
Post by lostinlimbo on Sept 30, 2017 5:05:31 GMT
There's no question the sister angle did limit how far the latter films could go with the concept. So yeah while the original was simple, it didn't have those boundaries which made that boogeyman vibe work.
I wouldn't lose any sleep either if the series had been put to bed, but still there must be something there for the production to attract Curtis. Well, I hope so.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2017 6:19:12 GMT
I loved Halloween 1-6, the other two were junk. I know I'm a minority but I really liked the cult storyline. I think they should make it as a tv series at some point. Maybe set it across thirty years starting in 1978.  |
|
theshape25
Sophomore
@theshape25
Posts: 877
Likes: 536
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 3, 2017 21:05:52 GMT
At first this was meant to be a sequel to II, and from what I'm hearing it could now be a sequel to the original. If either of these are the case her death in Resurrection need not be explained as it never happened. But to answer the question I guess I would go the cliche route and make it dream. Not the most original I know, but I can't really think of any other way to do it. She was just wounded and didn't die perhaps?
|
|
|
|
Post by HorrorMetal on Oct 4, 2017 16:31:29 GMT
So Curtis is returning as Laurie Strode and this movie will only acknowledge and follow the first two films? That sounds fine but didn't they do the exact same thing twenty years ago with H20? So I guess this is basically H40 then.
|
|
Flynn
Sophomore
@flynn
Posts: 515
Likes: 270
|
Post by Flynn on Oct 4, 2017 22:10:29 GMT
So Curtis is returning as Laurie Strode and this movie will only acknowledge and follow the first two films? That sounds fine but didn't they do the exact same thing twenty years ago with H20? So I guess this is basically H40 then. Yeah, it doesn't make sense to abandon the H20 continuity. The film is well-regarded among fans. So, if Curtis is returning, the only thing to do is to place the new film after H20. |
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Oct 4, 2017 22:15:23 GMT
Please.
God.
Make.
It.
Stop.
|
|
